On 2015-07-10 12:49:01 +0800 (+0800), StorwizeCI wrote:
[...]
> Old Account information:(Need to be removed)
> Username: ibm-storwize-ci
[...]
I've switched this account to inactive status in Gerrit now. Thanks
for reaching out to us.
--
Jeremy Stanley
___
Hi!
As you know, StoryBoard development was mostly abandoned by its original
development team, following the Infra team decision to no longer make it
its long-term strategy for OpenStack task tracking.
However, development was recently rebooted by two new contributors: Adam
Coldrick (SotK) and Za
I think we need to actually define the project's relationship to OpenStack
first. As of Vancouver, there was no decision made on whether to move
forward on StoryBoard, Maniphest, or something else. This lack of any kind
of forward commitment, both in resources and mandate, or even the lack of
abili
Thierry Carrez writes:
> As you know, StoryBoard development was mostly abandoned by its original
> development team, following the Infra team decision to no longer make it
> its long-term strategy for OpenStack task tracking.
>
> However, development was recently rebooted by two new contributors
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 8:29 AM Michael Krotscheck
wrote:
>
> It is quite telling (and I predicted this, just check the storyboard
> meeting logs form last April) that there has been zero progress on any
> storyboard alternatives since Vancouver.
>
I stand corrected on this (via IRC). There appe
James E. Blair wrote:
> I think that sounds good. My main concern is that storyboard stay
> stable and usable at least as long as we are using it. If they can
> support that, I'm happy to add them to core. I suspect this won't be a
> problem since they are also using it in production.
I think i
Elizabeth K. Joseph writes:
>
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 4:06 AM, Takeshi Larsson
> wrote:
> > Hows this going? Have you had any thoughts on which way you want to
go?
> > I'm the "not really a developer" for panopuppet and I was wondering
if there
> > was something you felt was missing from pan
leguin is transmitting its MOTD (containing "Umeå" twice) in ISO 8859-1.
This is causing havoc with one of OpenStack's python scripts, which is
happy with all the other servers that are sending valid UTF-8.
I think we would rejoice if someone could run iconv on the motd file
or whatever is necessa
RT has assigned ticket number [freenode.net #158989] for this, should
anyone need to follow up.
___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
