[OpenStack-Infra] enabling support for execution of tempest tests for an incubated openstack project.

2014-06-18 Thread Belur, Meera
Hello All, I have submitted a QA spec for adding tempest tests for barbican project. Here's the link to gerrit review for the QA spec: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/99978/ Currently Barbican is an incubated openstack project. In order to support enabling the execution of these gated tests, I u

[OpenStack-Infra] 转发: Re: About openstack branching model and openstack branch stable/icehouse

2014-06-18 Thread Le Tian Ren
Thanks a lot for the explanation, Jeremy, now I understand more about the 2 models. There is no much difference between them, except for release managment, I think. OpenStack use permanent major release(like icehouse, havana) branches for long term support(i.e., after icehouse is released, a secu

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] About openstack branching model and openstack branch stable/icehouse

2014-06-18 Thread Le Tian Ren
Thanks for sharing the gitflow tool, Bailey, and the "support" branches concepts in current nvie model, which the original version really needs to add for long term support products. I also mentioned this in the reply to Jeremy. Le Tian Ren (任乐天, \u4efb\u4e50\u5929) IBM OpenStack Development IBM C

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [QA] enabling support for execution of tempest tests for an incubated openstack project.

2014-06-18 Thread Malini Kamalambal
Hello, We went through a similar exercise for Marconi. At that point of time, there was not any documentation on the series of steps to go through. Below are some of the high level steps we went through. 1. Complete devstack integration (Make sure you run devstack with same local.conf as in

[OpenStack-Infra] Requesting Service Account for "Snabb NFV" 3rd party CI

2014-06-18 Thread Luke Gorrie
Howdy! I'd like to request a Service Account for "Snabb NFV", a new Neutron mech driver that I have proposed for Juno. Snabb NFV is a 100% open source project (http://snabb.co/nfv.html). If this affords me any extra facilities within OpenStack I'd love to know about that. Here are the particular

[OpenStack-Infra] Service Accounts for CI System

2014-06-18 Thread yang, xing
Hi All, We are in the process of setting up CI systems for EMC Cinder drivers. We have 4 products: VMAX, VNX, ViPR, and XIO. We need to have 4 CI systems, one for each product. We are requesting the following service accounts: emc-vmax-ci emc-vnx-ci emc-vipr-ci Another request will be sent l

[OpenStack-Infra] Status of check-tempest-dsvm-f20 job

2014-06-18 Thread Eoghan Glynn
Hi infra-ninjas, I missed this thread originally, not previously having been subscribed to os-infra ML. So I just wanted to throw out onto the table a (possibly naïve) alternative way of looking at this issue. The core problem seems to be that the node allocation algorithm has a tendency to ske

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Status of check-tempest-dsvm-f20 job

2014-06-18 Thread Ian Wienand
On 06/18/2014 06:46 PM, Eoghan Glynn wrote: > If we were to use f20 more widely in the gate (not to entirely > supplant precise, more just to split the load more evenly) then > would the problem observed tend to naturally resolve itself? I would be happy to see that, having spent some time on the

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Status of check-tempest-dsvm-f20 job

2014-06-18 Thread Eoghan Glynn
> On 06/18/2014 06:46 PM, Eoghan Glynn wrote: > > If we were to use f20 more widely in the gate (not to entirely > > supplant precise, more just to split the load more evenly) then > > would the problem observed tend to naturally resolve itself? > > I would be happy to see that, having spent som

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Status of check-tempest-dsvm-f20 job

2014-06-18 Thread Sean Dague
On 06/18/2014 05:45 AM, Eoghan Glynn wrote: > > >> On 06/18/2014 06:46 PM, Eoghan Glynn wrote: >>> If we were to use f20 more widely in the gate (not to entirely >>> supplant precise, more just to split the load more evenly) then >>> would the problem observed tend to naturally resolve itself? >>

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Requesting Service Account for "Snabb NFV" 3rd party CI

2014-06-18 Thread Sergey Lukjanov
Hello, we have an agreement on naming 3rd party testing now, I'm apologize that it's not well documented now. Ci if it votes or ever might in the future, Bot if it will never ever vote Format: username --> lowercase, hyphens between words, matches Full Name, -ci or -bot at the end Full Na

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Requesting Service Account for "Snabb NFV" 3rd party CI

2014-06-18 Thread Sergey Lukjanov
Oops, sorry for the typo. I'll create the account soon. On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Luke Gorrie wrote: > On 18 June 2014 13:19, Sergey Lukjanov wrote: >> >> we have an agreement on naming 3rd party testing now, I'm apologize >> that it's not well documented now. > > [...] >> >> So, I'm prop

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Service Accounts for CI System

2014-06-18 Thread Sergey Lukjanov
I've created all three requested accounts. On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 9:55 PM, yang, xing wrote: > Hi All, > > > > We are in the process of setting up CI systems for EMC Cinder drivers. We > have 4 products: VMAX, VNX, ViPR, and XIO. We need to have 4 CI systems, > one for each product. > > > > We

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Transferring the ownership of a CI account

2014-06-18 Thread Sergey Lukjanov
Hey, I think that we don't need anything more to do atm except transferring credentials. Thanks. On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 1:12 AM, Mohammad Banikazemi wrote: > I would like to transfer the ownership of our CI account (IBM Neutron > Testing) from myself to a colleague: > > Current owner: Mohammad

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Requesting Service Account for "Snabb NFV" 3rd party CI

2014-06-18 Thread Sergey Lukjanov
Done, account is ready. On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Sergey Lukjanov wrote: > Oops, sorry for the typo. I'll create the account soon. > > On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Luke Gorrie wrote: >> On 18 June 2014 13:19, Sergey Lukjanov wrote: >>> >>> we have an agreement on naming 3rd party tes

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] NetApp CI access

2014-06-18 Thread Sergey Lukjanov
Note: responded in https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ci/+bug/1284808 -- Sincerely yours, Sergey Lukjanov Sahara Technical Lead (OpenStack Data Processing) Principal Software Engineer Mirantis Inc. ___ OpenStack-Infra mailing list OpenStack-Infra@list

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Status of check-tempest-dsvm-f20 job

2014-06-18 Thread James E. Blair
Ian Wienand writes: > but eventually, at 30:1, the fedora node gets dropped I think the formula at work for deciding if a single marginal node should be allocated as a precise node is: (demand_for_precise / total_demand) * available_nodes Eg, round(20/40*1) = 1 so it's allocated as precise;

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Status of check-tempest-dsvm-f20 job

2014-06-18 Thread Eoghan Glynn
> On 06/18/2014 05:45 AM, Eoghan Glynn wrote: > > > > > >> On 06/18/2014 06:46 PM, Eoghan Glynn wrote: > >>> If we were to use f20 more widely in the gate (not to entirely > >>> supplant precise, more just to split the load more evenly) then > >>> would the problem observed tend to naturally re

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Service Accounts for CI System

2014-06-18 Thread yang, xing
Thanks Sergey! Here's a request to create a service account for emc-xio-ci. User name:emc-xio-ci Display name:EMC XIO Testor EMC XIO CI Email:emcxi...@gmail.com ssh-rsa B3NzaC1yc2EDAQABgQCwO1jUxqf/1W6YsV0LwwanUT0EhYdhjxrkrP/OZt34wR350763dJ/0RzsoJM//DcKN6uEJFZkd

[OpenStack-Infra] Add Datera service account

2014-06-18 Thread Mike Perez
Hello, I would like to have a service account added please. Pub key: ssh-rsa B3NzaC1yc2EDAQABgQCwIZcZ7jwJA3Fo071bvL7rPfKX4zv2t04mf4Xw9jhfgijQjd7WfWxYguLCuEf2ymB8yrn0XKfBV1XqbEhe9V33kPVzcGk0+omDb5BeY7lIgXVAloWHshx7D8UwwFLWUa/RREqaVow+zx5U3Rlg6OK5MyQRBAxeCtTczgPxOB8m3Q== username: date

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Add Datera service account

2014-06-18 Thread Anita Kuno
On 06/18/2014 04:21 PM, Mike Perez wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to have a service account added please. > > Pub key: > ssh-rsa > B3NzaC1yc2EDAQABgQCwIZcZ7jwJA3Fo071bvL7rPfKX4zv2t04mf4Xw9jhfgijQjd7WfWxYguLCuEf2ymB8yrn0XKfBV1XqbEhe9V33kPVzcGk0+omDb5BeY7lIgXVAloWHshx7D8UwwFLWUa/RREqa

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Status of check-tempest-dsvm-f20 job

2014-06-18 Thread Clark Boylan
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Eoghan Glynn wrote: > > >> On 06/18/2014 05:45 AM, Eoghan Glynn wrote: >> > >> > >> >> On 06/18/2014 06:46 PM, Eoghan Glynn wrote: >> >>> If we were to use f20 more widely in the gate (not to entirely >> >>> supplant precise, more just to split the load more evenly

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Add Datera service account

2014-06-18 Thread Mike Perez
On 16:46 Wed 18 Jun , Anita Kuno wrote: > On 06/18/2014 04:21 PM, Mike Perez wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I would like to have a service account added please. > > > > Pub key: > > ssh-rsa > > B3NzaC1yc2EDAQABgQCwIZcZ7jwJA3Fo071bvL7rPfKX4zv2t04mf4Xw9jhfgijQjd7WfWxYguLCuEf2ymB8yrn0XKfB

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Add Datera service account

2014-06-18 Thread Anita Kuno
On 06/18/2014 05:03 PM, Mike Perez wrote: > On 16:46 Wed 18 Jun , Anita Kuno wrote: >> On 06/18/2014 04:21 PM, Mike Perez wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I would like to have a service account added please. >>> >>> Pub key: >>> ssh-rsa >>> B3NzaC1yc2EDAQABgQCwIZcZ7jwJA3Fo071bvL7rPfKX4zv2t

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Add Datera service account

2014-06-18 Thread Mike Perez
On 17:08 Wed 18 Jun , Anita Kuno wrote: > On 06/18/2014 05:03 PM, Mike Perez wrote: > > On 16:46 Wed 18 Jun , Anita Kuno wrote: > >> On 06/18/2014 04:21 PM, Mike Perez wrote: > >>> Hello, > >>> > >>> I would like to have a service account added please. > >>> > >>> Pub key: > >>> ssh-rsa > >

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Add Datera service account

2014-06-18 Thread Anita Kuno
On 06/18/2014 05:11 PM, Mike Perez wrote: > On 17:08 Wed 18 Jun , Anita Kuno wrote: >> On 06/18/2014 05:03 PM, Mike Perez wrote: >>> On 16:46 Wed 18 Jun , Anita Kuno wrote: On 06/18/2014 04:21 PM, Mike Perez wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to have a service account added p

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Add Datera service account

2014-06-18 Thread Mike Perez
On 17:14 Wed 18 Jun , Anita Kuno wrote: > On 06/18/2014 05:11 PM, Mike Perez wrote: > > On 17:08 Wed 18 Jun , Anita Kuno wrote: > >> On 06/18/2014 05:03 PM, Mike Perez wrote: > >>> On 16:46 Wed 18 Jun , Anita Kuno wrote: > On 06/18/2014 04:21 PM, Mike Perez wrote: > > Hello, >

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Add Datera service account

2014-06-18 Thread Anita Kuno
On 06/18/2014 05:18 PM, Mike Perez wrote: > On 17:14 Wed 18 Jun , Anita Kuno wrote: >> On 06/18/2014 05:11 PM, Mike Perez wrote: >>> On 17:08 Wed 18 Jun , Anita Kuno wrote: On 06/18/2014 05:03 PM, Mike Perez wrote: > On 16:46 Wed 18 Jun , Anita Kuno wrote: >> On 06/18/2014

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Status of check-tempest-dsvm-f20 job

2014-06-18 Thread Eoghan Glynn
> >> >>> If we were to use f20 more widely in the gate (not to entirely > >> >>> supplant precise, more just to split the load more evenly) then > >> >>> would the problem observed tend to naturally resolve itself? > >> >> > >> >> I would be happy to see that, having spent some time on the Fedora

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Status of check-tempest-dsvm-f20 job

2014-06-18 Thread Clark Boylan
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Eoghan Glynn wrote: > > >> >> >>> If we were to use f20 more widely in the gate (not to entirely >> >> >>> supplant precise, more just to split the load more evenly) then >> >> >>> would the problem observed tend to naturally resolve itself? >> >> >> >> >> >> I wou

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Status of check-tempest-dsvm-f20 job

2014-06-18 Thread Monty Taylor
On 06/18/2014 03:10 PM, Clark Boylan wrote: > We are working on Trusty honest (I just got nodepool to build our > first Trusty images), and that solves this problem. There is a bigger > underlying issue in that projects should not depend on things like > mongodb versions which are not available on

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Status of check-tempest-dsvm-f20 job

2014-06-18 Thread Eoghan Glynn
- Original Message - > On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Eoghan Glynn wrote: > > > > > >> >> >>> If we were to use f20 more widely in the gate (not to entirely > >> >> >>> supplant precise, more just to split the load more evenly) then > >> >> >>> would the problem observed tend to natura

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Status of check-tempest-dsvm-f20 job

2014-06-18 Thread Eoghan Glynn
> On 06/18/2014 03:10 PM, Clark Boylan wrote: > > We are working on Trusty honest (I just got nodepool to build our > > first Trusty images), and that solves this problem. There is a bigger > > underlying issue in that projects should not depend on things like > > mongodb versions which are not a

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Status of check-tempest-dsvm-f20 job

2014-06-18 Thread Ian Wienand
On 06/19/2014 01:18 AM, James E. Blair wrote: (This requires tracking a bit more state across allocation runs). This seems to be the crux of the matter; once we have some state all sorts of things become possible. I've made a proposal in which seems like the most simple place to start; track i