Hi,
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 10:47 PM, James E. Blair wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At the PTG we brainstormed a road map for Zuul once we completed the
> infra cutover. I think we're in a position now that we can get back to
> thinking about this, so I've (slightly) cleaned it up and organized it
> here.
>
>
> 1 and 2 -> Create an httpd::mod defined type that is a wrapper of the
> original httpd_mod, as done on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/216835/. This
> wrapper should add the before (and notify?) calls ,
> as well as skipping the call to httpd_mod in centos case
> (https://review.openstack.org
Hi,
I apologize I wasn't here yesterday to discuss about that on IRC.
I was surprised also about not letting puppet ensuring that the service is
running and
now I understand well the reason behind it. But I think too, that for
most of downstream users (like those of puppet-openstackci) the most o
Hello Paul,
I can help for the Fedora packaging. At the moment I have two review requests
opened on
RedHat bugzilla for python-gear and python-zuul. Do you want I propose patches
on zuul-packaging
repo ?
Let me know how could I help.
Cheers,
Fabien
On 27/05/2015 18:11, Paul Belanger wrote:
>
below:
- Zuul : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220451
- python-gear : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215046
Have a good day,
Cheers,
Fabien Boucher
___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
