On 2019-05-14 14:23:51 -0700 (-0700), Clark Boylan wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2019, at 11:41 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> > On 2019-05-13 13:49:44 -0400 (-0400), Clark Boylan wrote:
> > [...]
> > > we discussed if OpenDev would be an appropriate location for
> > > throwaway repos and unfortunately we
On Tue, May 14, 2019, at 11:41 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2019-05-13 13:49:44 -0400 (-0400), Clark Boylan wrote:
> [...]
> > we discussed if OpenDev would be an appropriate location for
> > throwaway repos and unfortunately we don't think we are there yet.
> > Gerrit currently won't scale to th
On 2019-05-13 13:49:44 -0400 (-0400), Clark Boylan wrote:
[...]
> we discussed if OpenDev would be an appropriate location for
> throwaway repos and unfortunately we don't think we are there yet.
> Gerrit currently won't scale to that use case for us.
[...]
Thinking about this a little more, what
On Tue, May 14, 2019, at 11:18 AM, Whaley, Graham wrote:
> Hi,
> (please reply-all if you want me to see it - I am not subscribed to this
> list)
>
> I was heading to read the code for the kata zuul tenant, and had some
> niggles when trying to locate/navigate. I thought I'd at least drop the
Hi,
(please reply-all if you want me to see it - I am not subscribed to this list)
I was heading to read the code for the kata zuul tenant, and had some niggles
when trying to locate/navigate. I thought I'd at least drop the feedback here
(thanks ttx). Some of it will be specific to my 'flow'.
On Tue, 2019-05-07 at 13:47 -0400, Artom Lifshitz wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Following up on the CI session during the PTG [1], I wanted to get the
> ball rolling on getting GPU hardware into the gate somehow. Initially
> the plan was to do it through OpenLab and by convincing NVIDIA to
> donate the ca
