On 2018-01-12 11:09:10 +1100 (+1100), Ian Wienand wrote:
[...]
> I've seen occasional ARM things come by, but of course
> diskimage-builder doesn't have CI for it (yet :) so it's status is
> probably "unknown".
A problem which will solve itself! ;)
--
Jeremy Stanley
signature.asc
Description: P
Hello,
Recently Fungi removed old Jenkins' votes in Gerrit which had the effect of
bubbling up older infra-specs to the top of the review list. This prompted me
to start looking through the list. So far I have abandoned one spec,
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/163637/, as the Zuul v3 spec and
On 01/10/2018 08:41 PM, Gema Gomez wrote:
1. Control-plane project that will host a nodepool builder with 8 vCPUs,
8 GB RAM, 1TB storage on a Cinder volume for the image building scratch
space.
Does this mean you're planning on using diskimage-builder to produce
the images to run tests on? I've
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018, at 1:41 AM, Gema Gomez wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Linaro would like to add a new cloud to infra so that we can run tests
> on ARM64 going forward. This discussion has been ongoing for the good
> part of a year, apologies that it took us so long to get to a point
> where we feel com
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 07:58:11AM -0500, David Shrewsbury wrote:
> This is probably mostly my fault since I did not WIP or -2 my change in
> 532575 to keep it
> from getting merged without some infra coordination.
>
> Because of that change, it is also required that we change the user
> zuul-exec
This is probably mostly my fault since I did not WIP or -2 my change in
532575 to keep it
from getting merged without some infra coordination.
Because of that change, it is also required that we change the user
zuul-executor starts
as from root to zuul [1], and that we also open up the new default