On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 09:55:41AM -0800, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> Has the liberty-eol cleanup happened? Because I still see
> stable/liberty branch in openstack/neutron repo, which gets in the way
> of some logic around proactive backports:
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/427936/4/bugs-fixed-si
>
> I'd say reserve for 11 now. You can always adjust it as the etherpad
> changes.
>
>
I'd suggest maybe adding a few extra as we might find people during the day
who want to tag along.
___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.o
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017, at 08:45 AM, Clark Boylan wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2017, at 12:52 PM, Clark Boylan wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 7, 2017, at 04:28 PM, Clark Boylan wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > We failed at doing a lunch or dinner together in Barcelona because
> > > ETOOMANYTHINGS. Wondering if th
-Original Message-
From: Carmine Annunziata
Reply: Carmine Annunziata
Date: February 14, 2017 at 10:56:21
To: openstack-infra@lists.openstack.org
Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] urllib3 import problem
> Hi,
> I upgraded ubuntu 14.04 to 16.04 LTS and now during the ./stack.sh i got
> this pr
Excerpts from Clark Boylan's message of 2017-02-14 08:45:34 -0800:
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2017, at 12:52 PM, Clark Boylan wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 7, 2017, at 04:28 PM, Clark Boylan wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > We failed at doing a lunch or dinner together in Barcelona because
> > > ETOOMANYTHINGS. Won
As some of you may recall, Heidi Joy Tretheway has been wrangling
the OpenStack Foundation's effort to solicit mascots from each
project team and commission logo artists to produce a consistent set
of treatments which will be used on the foundation's Web properties
and which can also be reused by t
Hi,
I upgraded ubuntu 14.04 to 16.04 LTS and now during the ./stack.sh i got
this problem.
I upgraded with:
sudo pip install urllib3 --upgrade
but the problem is still there:
2017-02-14 15:54:40.894 | Traceback (most recent call last):
2017-02-14 15:54:40.894 | File "/opt/stack/requirements/.ven
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017, at 12:52 PM, Clark Boylan wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017, at 04:28 PM, Clark Boylan wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > We failed at doing a lunch or dinner together in Barcelona because
> > ETOOMANYTHINGS. Wondering if there is interest in attempting to do a
> > dinner during the PTG? Wo
On 2017-02-14 15:42:53 +0530 (+0530), Amrith Kumar wrote:
[...]
> I believe that to post reviews, one must register and sign a CLA.
[...]
Our OpenStack Individual Contributor License Agreement is about
provenance of source code contributions. Anyone can comment and even
vote on reviews without agr
On 14/02/17 22:33, Paul Belanger wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 03:42:53PM +0530, Amrith Kumar wrote:
It appears that a user registered as "openstack.cl...@gmail.com" has emerged
as a new bot that is posting a comment on numerous reviews with comments
like:[1]
"Patch Set 1: Code-Review-1
Not u
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 01:06:08PM +0400, Peter Razumovsky wrote:
> No one from our team have no rights to merge patches to fuel-ccp-designate.
> Please, help us to land patches asap, it's very important! Gerrit patch
> with created project: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/425035/
>
Looks like yo
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 03:42:53PM +0530, Amrith Kumar wrote:
> It appears that a user registered as "openstack.cl...@gmail.com" has emerged
> as a new bot that is posting a comment on numerous reviews with comments
> like:[1]
>
> "Patch Set 1: Code-Review-1
>
> Not urgent to merge just before Oc
It appears that a user registered as "openstack.cl...@gmail.com" has emerged
as a new bot that is posting a comment on numerous reviews with comments
like:[1]
"Patch Set 1: Code-Review-1
Not urgent to merge just before Ocata is released. And please save load to
the CI system."
"Patch Set 1: Code
No one from our team have no rights to merge patches to fuel-ccp-designate.
Please, help us to land patches asap, it's very important! Gerrit patch
with created project: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/425035/
2017-02-13 18:13 GMT+04:00 Peter Razumovsky :
>
> -- Forwarded message ---
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 7:15 PM, Tom Fifield wrote:
> On 14/02/17 16:11, Joshua Hesketh wrote:
>
>> Hey Tom,
>>
>> Where is that script being fired from (a quick grep doesn't find it), or
>> is it a tool people are using?
>>
>> If it's a tool we'd need to make sure whoever is using it gets a new
On 14/02/17 16:11, Joshua Hesketh wrote:
Hey Tom,
Where is that script being fired from (a quick grep doesn't find it), or
is it a tool people are using?
If it's a tool we'd need to make sure whoever is using it gets a new
version to rule it out.
Indeed.
It's fired from a PHP service on www
Hey Tom,
Where is that script being fired from (a quick grep doesn't find it), or is
it a tool people are using?
If it's a tool we'd need to make sure whoever is using it gets a new
version to rule it out.
- Josh
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 7:07 PM, Tom Fifield wrote:
> On 14/02/17 16:06, Joshua
On 14/02/17 16:06, Joshua Hesketh wrote:
Hey,
I've brought the service back up, but have no new clues as to why.
Cheers.
Going to try: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/433478/
to see if this script is culprit.
- Josh
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 6:50 PM, Tom Fifield mailto:t...@openstack.org>>
Hey,
I've brought the service back up, but have no new clues as to why.
- Josh
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 6:50 PM, Tom Fifield wrote:
> On 10/02/17 22:39, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
>
>> On 2017-02-10 16:08:51 +0800 (+0800), Tom Fifield wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>>> Down again, this time with "Network is unr
19 matches
Mail list logo
