On 10 Nov 2016 8:56 PM, "Thierry Carrez" wrote:
>
> The issue with this solution is that any "monthly" slot ends up being
> exactly the same as a "weekly" slot: you can't schedule any
> weekly/biweekly meetings at the same time and location. Monthly meetings
> are therefore paradoxically more wast
Thierry Carrez wrote on 11/10/2016 6:52 PM:
Tony Breeds wrote:
On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 10:56:38AM +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Our scheduling system currently only supports biweekly or weekly
meetings. We don't currently support monthly or triweekly meetings
(mostly to avoid having to detect c
Up until now the v3 feature branch has been managed mostly in an etherpad
and by manual coordination.
With the team of developers expanding, we need to impose a bit more
structure on the effort.
So, with that, all of the stories and tasks have been added to
Storyboard with the zuulv3 tag.
https:
Ildiko Vancsa wrote on 11/10/2016 4:57 AM:
Hi,
I like the ISO week numbers better. I think it’s more consistent,
gives a regular cadence and does not cause confusions with having a
meeting on the 5th week or not for instance.
My 2 cents.
Make sense. Then IMO changing [1] with biweekly-odd or
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016, at 08:46 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> On 11/10/2016 11:31 AM, Clark Boylan wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016, at 04:17 AM, Olena Logvinova wrote:
> >> Hi Infra team!
> >>
> >> We need a stable/newton branch to be created for the openstack-manuals
> >> repo, please. The date ann
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 6:41 PM, Thanh Ha
wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I'd like to keep the momentum of JJB 2.0 work going as we're so close to
> the finish line. This Friday we're going to continue our sprint in
> #openstack-sprint for those who can make it. Wayne suggested we send a
> status to the
On 11/10/2016 11:31 AM, Clark Boylan wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016, at 04:17 AM, Olena Logvinova wrote:
Hi Infra team!
We need a stable/newton branch to be created for the openstack-manuals
repo, please. The date announced in the mailing list is November, 11
(tomorrow).
Who would be able to do
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016, at 04:17 AM, Olena Logvinova wrote:
> Hi Infra team!
>
> We need a stable/newton branch to be created for the openstack-manuals
> repo, please. The date announced in the mailing list is November, 11
> (tomorrow).
>
>
> Who would be able to do that?
The release team has bee
On 2016-11-10 09:19:32 + (+), Marton Kiss wrote:
> Jeremy, I can apply and test this patch in a current test environment, it
> was sitting there for a while. Usually the config changes of askbot broke
> the site.
[...]
If you get a chance, that would be a big help. I have logs from the
fai
Hi Infra team!
We need a stable/newton branch to be created for the openstack-manuals
repo, please. The date announced in the mailing list is November, 11
(tomorrow).
Who would be able to do that?
Thanks in advance for your help!
Olena
--
Best regards,
Olena Logvinova,
Technical Writer | Mira
Tony Breeds wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 10:56:38AM +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
>
>> Our scheduling system currently only supports biweekly or weekly
>> meetings. We don't currently support monthly or triweekly meetings
>> (mostly to avoid having to detect complex conflicts with biweekly meet
Jeremy, I can apply and test this patch in a current test environment, it
was sitting there for a while. Usually the config changes of askbot broke
the site.
Marton
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 10:26 PM Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2016-11-09 19:53:27 + (+), Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> > On 2016-11
12 matches
Mail list logo
