Hi Paul, as I know, nova can guarante the ordering of vNICS, can you provide
the reproduceable test script for this, I am glad to test it
At 2014-08-10 01:16:16, "Jay Pipes" wrote:
>Paul, does this friend of a friend have a reproduceable test script for
>this?
>
>Thanks!
>-jay
>
>On 08/0
hi neutroner!
my patch about
BP:https://blueprints.launchpad.net/openstack/?searchtext=add-ipset-to-security
need install ipset in devstack, I have commit the
patch:https://review.openstack.org/#/c/113453/, who can help me review it,
thanks very much!
Best regards,
shihanzhang
As I know there is no a way to disable default security groups, but I think
this BP can solve this problem:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/default-rules-for-default-security-group
在 2014-09-17 07:44:42，"Aaron Rosen" 写道：
Hi,
Inline:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 1:00 AM, Fawad
Now there is already a bug:https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1334926 for
this problem, meanwhile the security group also has same problem, I have report
a bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1335375
在 2014-09-16 01:46:11，"Martinx - ジェームズ" 写道：
Hey stackers,
Let me ask so
I think that these two BP is to achieve same function,it is very necessary to
implement this function!
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/router-port-forwarding
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/neutron-napt-api
At 2014-01-09 16:56:20,"Nir Yechiel" wrote:
From: "
I am also perplexed about the ports backing floating ips. when plugin is
selected OVS or LB, the ip address belonging to a port backing that floating
ip is really set on VIF of 'qg-' , what is the port real action?
At 2014-01-15 07:50:36,"Salvatore Orlando" wrote:
TL;DR;
I have been loo
I am a beginer of nova, there is a problem which has confused me, in the latest
version, it not allowed to create a vm directly with two VIF in the same
network, but allowed to add a VIF that it network is same with a existed
VIF'network, there is the use case that a vm with two VIF in the same
d it makes perfect sense, LACP, MLT,
Etherchannel/Portchannel, etc. In the virtual world I need to see a detailed
description of one or more use cases.
Shihanzhang, why don’t you start up an Etherpad or something and start putting
together a list of one or more practical use cases in which t
Howdy folks!
I am a beginer of neutron, there is a problem which has confused me. In my
environment using openvswich plugin, I delete the dhcp port by mistack, then I
found the VM in the subnet whose dhcp port is deleted by my mistack can not get
IP, I found the reason is when a dhcp port is de
I'm interested in it. UTC8.
At 2014-02-15 00:31:47,"punal patel" wrote:
I am interested. UTC - 8.
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 1:48 AM, Nick Ma wrote:
I'm also interested in it. UTC8.
--
cheers,
Li Ma
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@li
I think the problem is in nova, can you show your "pci_passthrough_whitelist"
in nova.conf?
At 2014-12-04 18:26:21, "Akilesh K" wrote:
Hi,
I am using neutron-plugin-sriov-agent.
I have configured pci_whitelist in nova.conf
I have configured ml2_conf_sriov.ini.
But when I launch inst
Hi Vinay,
I am very happy to participate in this discussion!
在 2014-05-16 00:03:35，"Kanzhe Jiang" 写道：
Hi Vinay,
I am interested. You could sign up a slot for a Network POD discussion.
Thanks,
Kanzhe
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 7:13 AM, Vinay Yadhav wrote:
Hi,
I am Vinay, working with
Howdy Stackers!
There is a security group problem has been bothering me, but I do not know
whether is appropriate to consult in there! For a security group rule, it will
convert to iptable rules in compute node, but a iptable rule '-m state --state
RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j RETURN' confuse me, ac
Hi, Elena Ezhova, thanks for your work to this problem!
I agree with your analysis, this why I commit this bug but don't submit patch
for it.
I have want to use conntrack to solve this bug, but I also thought the
problem you have said:
The problem here is that it is sometimes imp
I also agree file a new bug for FWaaS
At 2014-10-28 00:09:29, "Carl Baldwin" wrote:
>I think I'd suggest opening a new bug for FWaaS since it is a
>different component with different code. It doesn't seem natural to
>extend the scope of this bug to include it.
>
>Carl
>
>On Mon, Oct 27, 2
Hello all,
Now in neutron, it use iptable implementing security group, but the performance
of this implementation is very poor, there is a
bug:https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1302272 to reflect this problem. In
his test, with default security groups(which has remote security group), b
formance issues until the
ovs firewall can be implemented down the the line.
Do you have any performance comparisons?
On Jun 18, 2014 7:46 PM, "shihanzhang" wrote:
Hello all,
Now in neutron, it use iptable implementing security group, but the performance
of this implementation
my BP specs?
At 2014-06-19 10:11:34, "Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo" wrote:
>
> Hi it's a very interesting topic, I was getting ready to raise
>the same concerns about our security groups implementation, shihanzhang
>thank you for starting this topic.
>
>
Hi, Lingxian
I think it indeed backport this feature to neutron, it will be very convenient
for operators to use default security group!
At 2014-06-23 10:23:39, "Lingxian Kong" wrote:
>Greetings
>
>We use neutron as network functionality implementation in nova, and as
>you know, there i
I think this problem also exist in security group!
At 2014-06-27 11:20:31, "stanzgy" wrote:
I have filed this bug on nova
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1334938
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 10:19 AM, Yongsheng Gong
wrote:
I have reported it on neutron project
https://bugs.launchpad.
nstances on a certain security group get
> the updates as they happen.
>
>@shihanzhang do you find it reasonable?
>
>
>
>- Original Message -
>> - Original Message -
>> > @Nachi: Yes that could a good improvement to factorize the RPC mechanism.
>> >
just using ipset to optimize security group agent codes does
not bring the best results!
Best regards,
shihanzhang.
At 2014-07-02 04:43:24, "Ihar Hrachyshka" wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA512
>
>On 02/07/14 10:12, Miguel Angel Ajo wr
Hi Alioune and Cathy,
For devstack on ubuntu14.04, the default ovs version is 2.0.2, so there
was the error as Alioune said.
Do we need to install speical ovs version in networking-sfc devstack
plugin.sh?
在 2016-06-07 07:48:26，"Cathy Zhang" 写道：
Hi Alioune,
Which OVS ver
good suggestion！
At 2015-12-25 19:07:10, "Li Ma" wrote:
>Hi all, currently, we only support db_ip and db_port in the
>configuration file. Some DB SDK supports clustering, like Zookeeper.
>You can specify a list of nodes when client application starts to
>connect to servers.
>
>I'd like to impl
I have same question, I have filed a bug on launchpad:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1476469,
who can help to clarify it?
Thanks,
Hanzhang, shi
At 2015-08-05 00:33:05, "Sergey Kolekonov" wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to clarify a situation around VPNaaS and DVR compatibility in Neutron
hi Vikas Choudhary, when ovs-agent service recover(ovs-agent process restart),
the dhcp port will not re-binding successfully?
At 2015-08-22 14:26:08, "Vikas Choudhary" wrote:
Hi Everybody,
I want to discuss on https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1348589.This is
there for more than a
there was another patch [1] fix the invalid CIDR for subnet.
thanks,
hanzhang, shi
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/201942/
At 2015-08-22 03:33:26, "Jay Pipes" wrote:
>On 08/21/2015 02:34 PM, Sean M. Collins wrote:
>> So - the tl;dr is that I don't think that we should accept inputs l
Sean,
Thank you very much for writing this, DVR indeed need to get more attention,
it's a very cool and usefull feature, especially in large-scale. In Juno, it
firstly lands to Neutron, through the development of Kilo and Liberty, it's
getting better and better, we have used it in our productio
2) The same FIP address can be used for different mappings, for example
FIP with IP X
can be used with different ports to map to different VM's X:4001 ->
VM1 IP
X:4002 -> VM2 IP (This is the essence of port forwarding).
So we also need the port mapping
which branch do you use? there is not this problem in master branch.
At 2015-09-28 13:43:05, "masoom alam" wrote:
Can anybody highlight why the following command is throwing an exception:
Command# neutron port-update db3113df-14a3-4d6d-a3c5-d0517a134fc3
--allowed-address-pairs action=cle
I checkout the latest code are you saying this...Also can you please
confirm if you have tested this thing at your endand there was no problem...
Thanks
On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 11:29 PM, shihanzhang wrote:
which branch do you use? there is not this problem in master branch.
At 2
hi Shraddha Pandhe,
I think your analysis is right, I also encountered the same problem， I have
filed a bug[1] and commit a patch [2] for this bug.
thanks,
hanzhang shi
[1] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1469615
[2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/196927/
在 2015-07-01 08:25:48，"Shraddha Pa
hi, Zhi Chang,
this link: #https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1218629 is ok.
At 2015-07-06 17:13:12, "Zhi Chang" wrote:
Thanks for your reply. Could you send the html link again? This does maybe
doesn't exist.
Thx
Zhi Chang
-- Original --
From:
elp
me to explain?
Thanks.
-shihanzhang
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
+1 to deprecate this option
At 2015-03-21 02:57:09, "Assaf Muller" wrote:
>Hello everyone,
>
>The use_namespaces option in the L3 and DHCP Neutron agents controls if you
>can create multiple routers and DHCP networks managed by a single L3/DHCP
>agent,
>or if the agent manages only a single res
Hi Eric,
Huawei is also interested in this BP, Hope it can be discussed during the
design summit.
Thanks,
shihanzhang
在 2015-05-12 08:23:07，"Karthik Natarajan" 写道：
Hi Eric,
Brocade is also interested in the VLAN aware VM’s BP. Let’s discuss it during
the design summit.
As I know, now dragonflow still use neutron l3-agent for snat, so the l3-agent
is enabled and router namespace be created.
在 2016-07-28 08:53:20，kangjingt...@sina.com 写道：
Hi
The reason why a namepspace be created while creating router is just because
l3-agent is enabled. You can disable
hi Zhi chang,
Could you provide your ml2_conf.ini for ovs agent, I guess the reason is that
your ovs-agent on host devstack can't handle the related segment id.
Thanks,
shihanzhang
在 2016-10-31 18:43:36，"zhi" 写道：
Hi, all.
Recently, I watch the OpenStack Summit video nam
Hi Zhi Chang,
Maybe you should add a config option in [ovs] section: bridge_mappings =
public:br-ex, physnet1:br-physnet1 to handle the provider network 'physnet1'.
Thanks,
shihanzhang
At 2016-11-01 11:56:33, "zhi" wrote:
hi shihanzhang.
Below is configuration in
Hi Zhi Chang,
You also need to connect these two subnets to a router.
Thanks,
shihanzhang
在 2016-11-01 15:47:57，"zhi" 写道：
Hi, shihanzhang.
I still have a question about routed network. I have two subnets. One is
10.1.0.0/24 and the other is 10.1.1.0/24. I create two instances in
agree with Neil.
thanks
shihanzhang
在 2016-11-01 17:13:54，"Neil Jerram" 写道：
Hi Zhi Chang,
I believe the answer is that the physical network (aka fabric) should provide
routing between those two subnets. This routing between segments is implicit in
the idea of a multi-segme
41 matches
Mail list logo
