+1
2014-03-04 2:29 GMT+08:00 Kurt Griffiths :
> Hi folks, I'd like to propose adding* Fei Long Wang (flwang) *as a core
> reviewer on the *Marconi* team. He has been contributing regularly over
> the past couple of months, and has proven to be a careful reviewer with
> good judgment.
>
> *All
VLAN provider
network.
Thanks & regards,
Xurong Yang
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Hi, Folks,
When we configure VXLAN range [1,16M], neutron-server service costs long
time and cpu rate is very high(100%) when initiation. One test base on
postgresql has been verified: more than 1h when VXLAN range is [1, 1M].
So, any good solution about this performance issue?
Thanks,
Xurong
Hi,
Thanks for your response, yes, i get the reason, so, That's why i question
that whether one good solution can have a high performance with a large
vxlan range? if possible, a blueprint is deserved to consider.
Tanks,
Xurong Yang
2014-05-29 18:12 GMT+08:00 ZZelle :
> Hi,
>
>
&
ing attributes.
> The blueprint specification and associated implementation are under
> reviews[1].
>
> [1]
> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/provider-network-partial-specs,n,z
>
>
> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Henry Gessau wrote:
>
>> On 5/29/2014 4
Hi,
i have reported a bug[1]
[1]https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1324875
but no better idea about this issue now, maybe need more discussion.
any thoughts?
:)
Xurong Yang
2014-05-31 6:33 GMT+08:00 Eugene Nikanorov :
> > I was thinking it would be a separate process that
mically is very difficult and ends up being
> very
> > >>> >> slow and has caused us some grief. The free space also gets
> > >>> >> fragmented which degrades performance. This is what led me --
> > >>> >> somewhat reluctantly -- to change how IPs get recy
Hi, Stackers
My use case:
under project_id A:
1.create firewall rule default(share=false).
2.create firewall policy default(share=false).
3.attach rule to policy.
4.update policy(share=true)
under project_id B:
1.create firewall with policy(share=true) based on project A.
then create firewall fai
rewall rule protocol=icmp , action =deny and
desitination-ip-address as fix ip, ping fail.
in short , router firewall can't take effect about floating ip.
what do you think?
Cheers,
Xurong Yang
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStac
rs,
Xurong
2014-06-05 22:00 GMT+08:00 Gary Duan :
> Xurong,
>
> Firewall is colocated with router. You need to create a router, then the
> firewall state will be updated.
>
> Gary
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 2:48 AM, Xurong Yang wrote:
>
>> Hi, Stackers
>>
Yes, right, but why can't use floating ip? Administrator or user should
care the floating ip for instance rather fix ip. So i think firewall also
take effect about floating ip.
Thanks,
Xurong Yang
2014-06-05 19:32 GMT+08:00 ZZelle :
> Hi,
>
> When the router receives packets fro
More detail:
It's allowed to create duplicate sg with the same name.
so exception happens when creating instance with the duplicate sg name.
code following:
security_groups = kwargs.get('security_groups', [])
security_group_ids = []
# TODO(arosen) Should optimi
It's allowed to create duplicate sg with the same name.
so exception happens when creating instance with the duplicate sg name.
code following:
security_groups = kwargs.get('security_groups', [])
security_group_ids = []
# TODO(arosen) Should optimize more to do
thanks,Xurong
2014-03-11 21:33 GMT+08:00 mar...@redhat.com :
> On 11/03/14 10:20, Xurong Yang wrote:
> > It's allowed to create duplicate sg with the same name.
> > so exception happens when creating instance with the duplicate sg name.
>
> Hi Xurong - fyi there is a re
Ok. I think the bug/1289195 cover it, so we can continue the discussion
there.
thanks!Xurong
2014-03-12 15:44 GMT+08:00 mar...@redhat.com :
> On 12/03/14 03:17, Xurong Yang wrote:
> > Hi,Lingxian & marios
> > Thank for response. yes,personally speaking, it should be using
nagement center
> wants to query the ports that have changed or refreshed during the latest
> 5sec in a large scale application. If not, it's time-consuming and low
> effectiveness.
> >> Link: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/add-port-
ly VM was
associated with two ports which was not expected.
So, any good solution about this issue?
Thanks
Xurong Yang
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Xurong Yang
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Hi folks,
Could anyone please review this spec for adding a new API to count
resources in Neutron?
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/102199/
Thanks
Xurong Yang
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org
19 matches
Mail list logo