Hi
As people join mid-cycle meetup, we cancel nova API meeting this week.
Thanks
Alex
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
Replied in line with prefix [alex]
-Original Message-
From: John Garbutt [mailto:j...@johngarbutt.com]
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 8:05 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][api] New micro-version needed for api bug
fix or
I also learn that from Sean!
-Original Message-
From: Jay Pipes [mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2015 2:58 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][api] New micro-version needed for api bug
fix or not?
On 05/29/2015 05:04 AM, John G
gt;
> On 31 May 2015 at 14:15, Xu, Hejie wrote:
> > Replied in line with prefix [alex]
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: John Garbutt [mailto:j...@johngarbutt.com]
> > 1)
> > We agreed changing a 500 error to an existing error (or making it succeed
not?
>
> 2015-06-01 13:40 GMT+02:00 John Garbutt :
> > On 31 May 2015 at 14:15, Xu, Hejie wrote:
> >> Replied in line with prefix [alex]
> >>
> >> -Original Message-
> ...
> >> 2)
> >> We also agreed that all micro version bumps
> -Original Message-
> From: Xu, Hejie [mailto:hejie...@intel.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2015 3:34 PM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][api] New micro-version needed for api b
Hi, guys,
I'm working on adding Microversion into the API-WG's guideline which make sure
we have consistent Microversion behavior in the API for user.
The Nova and Ironic already have Microversion implementation, and as I know
Magnum https://review.openstack.org/#/c/184975/ is going to implement
o use Microversion?
Thanks.
2015-06-04 14:58 GMT+08:00 Xu, Hejie
mailto:hejie...@intel.com>>:
Hi, guys,
I’m working on adding Microversion into the API-WG’s guideline which make sure
we have consistent Microversion behavior in the API for user.
The Nova and Ironic already have Microversion implemen
sion
guideline in API-WG
On Jun 5, 2015 4:36 AM, "Sean Dague" mailto:s...@dague.net>>
wrote:
>
> On 06/05/2015 01:28 AM, Adrian Otto wrote:
> >
> >> On Jun 4, 2015, at 11:03 AM, Devananda van der Veen
> >> mailto:devananda@gmail.com>
adheres to the current guideline proposal or whether it might
be the case to include Neutron's requirements in the current guideline proposal.
Salvatore
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/136760/
On 10 June 2015 at 06:28, Xu, Hejie
mailto:hejie...@intel.com>> wrote:
I upd
Learn a lot again! ++ for "sub-error-codes".
From: Everett Toews [mailto:everett.to...@rackspace.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2015 6:26 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [api] Changing 403 Forbidden to 400 Bad Request
for OverQuota w
11 matches
Mail list logo
