Hi Kurt,
We (Arista) were one of the early adapters of the CI systems. We built our
system based upon the Neutron requirements as of late last year/early this
year. Our CI has been up and operational since January of this year. This
is before (or in parallel to Jay Pipes effort of Zuul based CIs).
Incidentally, I replied to Kurt's email this morning on this subject -
below is what I wrote.
There are several threads with such information. While it is great to
express opinions on the MLs, converting them into decisions/conclusions
should be done in a formal fashion. I suggested that this be ad
+1
It will be very useful to have neutron specific meetings on iCal -
considering that they will be moving around...
-Sukhdev
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 6:58 PM, Kevin Benton wrote:
> Unfortunately the master ICAL has so many meetings that it's not useful to
> have displaying as part of a normal
+1
I'll be there..
Sukhdev
On Dec 10, 2013 12:43 PM, "Kyle Mestery" wrote:
> OK, looks like we've reached consensus. I've set the time and channel
> to 12-12-2013 (Thursday), 1700UTC, on #openstack-meeting-alt.
>
> Thanks!
> Kyle
>
> On Dec 10, 2013, at 12:59 PM, Gary Duan wrote:
>
> > I will b
e of McGill University.
> > Time: 9am - 5am
> Time: 9am - 5pm
> >
> > I am expecting to see the following people in Montreal in January:
> > Mark McClain
> > Salvatore Orlando
> > Sean Dague
> > Matt Trenish
> > Jay Pipes
> > Sukhdev Kapur
>
Hi Miguel,
As I am using neutron API tempest tests, I notice that in the create_port
tests, the port context is set partially - i.e. only network Id is
available.
ML2 drivers expect more in formation in the port context in order to test
the API on the back-ends.
I noticed such an enhancement is n
Dear fellow developers,
I am running few Neutron tempest tests and noticing an intermittent failure
of tempest.scenario.test_network_basic_ops.
I ran this test 50+ times and am getting intermittent failure. The pass
rate is apps. 70%. The 30% of the time it fails mostly in
_check_public_network_c
since it would help me in my own bug-searching endeavors.
>>
>>
> Basically those are all the patches addressing the linked blueprint; I
> have added more info in the commit messages for the patches.
> Also some of those patches target this bug as well:
> https://bugs.launch
Hi Anita, et. all,
I understand if the -1 is being voted because of testing framework
failures, it is a real pain.
Assuming the framework is working fine, I have noticed that there could be
genuine failures because of devstack failing to fully stack up or the test
failures. In my specific case, I
drivers).
>> End-to-end testing for particular ml2 drivers seems to fit in 3rd party
>> testing
>> where you can run additional tests which are configuration-specific.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Eugene.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 4:36 AM, Sukhdev Kapur
Hi All,
During tempest sprint in Montreal, as we were writing API tests, we noticed
a behavior which we believed is an issue with the Neutron API (or perhaps
documentation or both)
Let me start with a question:
If one executes an api to create/delete/update a neutron resource, what is
the API's
Hi Swaminathan,
I assume you will be posting the time, location, and the dial-in details of
this meeting, once it is finalized, right?
-Sukhdev
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Vasudevan, Swaminathan (PNB Roseville) <
swaminathan.vasude...@hp.com> wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I would like to invit
Hi Jay,
Thanks for bringing this up. I have been trying to make the recheck work
and have not had much success. Therefore, I agree that we should go with
option a) for the short term until b) or c) becomes available.
I would prefer b) because we have already invested a lot in our solution
and it i
at 4:16 PM, Sukhdev Kapur wrote:
> Hi Jay,
>
> Thanks for bringing this up. I have been trying to make the recheck work
> and have not had much success. Therefore, I agree that we should go with
> option a) for the short term until b) or c) becomes available.
> I would prefer b) beca
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 12:34 -0800, Sukhdev Kapur wrote:
> > Jay,
> >
> > Just an FYI. We have modified the Gerrit plugin it accept/match regex
> > to generate notifications of for "receck no bug/bug ###"
Fellow developers,
I just put together a wiki describing the Arista Third Party Setup.
In the attached document we provide a link to the modified Gerrit Plugin to
handle the regex matching for the "Comment Added" event so that
"recheck/reverify no bug/" can be handled.
https://wiki.openstack.
Folks,
I just sent out another email.
Here is the link to the wiki which has details about this patch.
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Arista-third-party-testing
Hope this helps.
-Sukhdev
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Sukhdev Kapur
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 1
modified gerrit plugin.. If you
have any issue, post it here, this will help me modify the document to make
it more useful for others to follow.
best of luck
>
> --
>
> Trinath Somanchi - B39208
>
> trinath.soman...@freescale.com | extn: 4048
>
>
>
> *From:* Sukhd
Folks,
Like Ian, I am jumping in this very late as well - as I decided to travel
Europe after the summit, just returned back and catching up :-):-)
I have noticed that this thread has gotten fairly convoluted and painful to
read.
I think Armando summed it up well in the beginning of the thread.
Congratulations Henry and Kevin. It has always been pleasure working with
you guys.
If I may express my opinion, Bob's contribution to ML2 has been quite
substantial. The kind of stability ML2 has achieved makes a statement of
his dedication to this work. I have worked very closely with Bob o
Dear fellow ML2'ers,
In sprit of holidays, Bob and I decided to cancel this week's ML2 meeting.
We will resume our meetings from January 7th onwards.
Happy New Year to you and your loved ones.
-Sukhdev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists
Hi all,
HAPPY NEW YEAR.
Starting Monday (Jan 5th, 2015) we will be kicking of bi-weekly meetings
for L2 Gateway discussions.
We are hoping to come up with an initial version of L2 Gateway API in Kilo
cycle. The intent of these bi-weekly meetings is to discuss issues related
to L2 Gateway API.
A
t;> you define what you're thinking of when you say 'L2 gateway'?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> --
>> Ian.
>>
>> On 2 January 2015 at 18:28, Sukhdev Kapur wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> HAPPY NEW YEAR.
>>>
>>>
Hi All,
I noticed that several neutron patches are failing
check-grenade-dsvm-neutron. I pinged it on IRC, did not get any response,
thought I post it here.
-Sukhdev
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage quest
Hi All,
I am seeing very frequent failures of devstack on our CI because of q-vpn
service failures. This has happened very recently. Is this a know issue?
I am tempted to disable q-vpn service on our CI to avoid this noise. I
wanted to reach out to see if others are also seeing this issue.
please
ing?
>
> Regards,
>
> PCM
>
> PCM (Paul Michali)
>
> IRC pc_m (irc.freenode.com)
> Twitter... @pmichali
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Sukhdev Kapur
> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I am seeing very frequent failures o
Hi All,
I noticed that our CI got hit sometime last night. Neutron is unable to
create "private" network as there is no Tenant ID.
Please see the error log here - http://paste.openstack.org/show/159912/
It appears that keystone is not creating tenant. Keystone screen log did
not show anything ob
Hi Ihar,
I have added this on the agenda for next neutron core meeting to discuss.
This email gives an excellent context to the issue at hand. Only one thing
I would like to add is that the deadline for stable/juno is only one week
away - hence, it raises the urgency to call for action.
Thanks
I noticed this afternoon (Saturday PST 1:18pm) that most of the Third Party
test systems started to fail because of the seuptools bug because of
dependency in python-swiftclient. I further noticed that some of the CI's
are voting +1, but, when I look through the logs, they seem to be hitting
this i
Hi Kyle,
Arista CI has been voting +1 for success and comments in case of Failures.
Are the CI's now allowed to post -1 for failures? I have to make a minor
change to start voting -1.
Please advise.
-Sukhdev
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Kyle Mestery
wrote:
> I've spent some time doing s
to get past the issue - until the fix in the
upstream is merged.
Note that you have to install mercurial to pull this patch.
Hope this helps.
regards..
-Sukhdev
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 5:45 PM, Sukhdev Kapur
wrote:
> I noticed this afternoon (Saturday PST 1:18pm) that most of the Th
Oppss...sorry wrong link... please use this
http://paste.openstack.org/show/84073/.
If anybody needs help, please ping me or go to #openstack-infra.
regards..
-Sukhdev
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Sukhdev Kapur
wrote:
> Fellow Stackers,
>
> I have an update on the issue.
>
I see the same issue. This issue has crept in during the latest flurry of
check-ins. I started noticing this issue a day or two before the Icehouse
Feature Freeze deadline.
I tried restarting tgt as well, but, it does not help.
However, rebooting the VM helps clear it up.
Has anybody else seen i
; on by adding -d to the tgtd start.
> I'm investigating a similar issue with tgt on test_boot_pattern test. It
> turns out that the file written to the volume in the first instance is not
> found by the second instance. But that's a separate issue.
>
> -rfolco
>
>
&
I have noticed that even clone of devstack has failed few times within last
couple of hours - it was running fairly smooth so far.
-Sukhdev
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 5:05 PM, Sukhdev Kapur wrote:
> [adding openstack-dev list as well ]
>
> I have noticed that this has stated hitting
Hey Monty,
The issue is when we are using stack.sh, how do we use cache dir as oppose
to going at git?
Is there any option which can be set to utilize this feature?
-Sukhdev
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
> Honestly not being snarky here ... The reason is that github if
[adding openstack-dev list as well ]
I have noticed that this has stated hitting my builds within last few
hours. I have noticed exact same failures on almost 10 builds.
Looks like something has happened within last few hours - perhaps the load?
-Sukhdev
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 4:28 PM, Dane L
Can somebody explain to me the purpose of this email. Is there any action
required of me regarding this?
Thanks
-Sukhdev
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 1:10 PM, openstack-gerrit
wrote:
> Thank you for contributing to openstack/neutron!
>
> openstack/neutron uses Gerrit for code review.
>
> Please vis
ntu 12.04 host,
>
> it didn't happen again after messing with the Kernel Semaphore Limits
> parameters [1]:
>
>
>
> Adding this [2] line to `/etc/sysctl.conf` seems to do the trick.
>
>
>
>
>
> - Roey
>
>
>
>
>
> [1] http://paste.openst
Folks,
After Maruti's lighting talk on L2 Gateway, bunch of people/vendors
expressed interest in coming up with an API for this service. The goal is
to come up with a basic set of API which can be implemented in Kilo time
frame and build upon it over time in the future.
Armando, Akihiro, and other
resending with with the correct subject
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Sukhdev Kapur
wrote:
> Folks,
>
> After Maruti's lighting talk on L2 Gateway, bunch of people/vendors
> expressed interest in coming up with an API for this service. The goal is
> to come up with a ba
, Sukhdev Kapur
wrote:
> Folks,
>
> After Maruti's lighting talk on L2 Gateway, bunch of people/vendors
> expressed interest in coming up with an API for this service. The goal is
> to come up with a basic set of API which can be implemented in Kilo time
> frame and build u
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Kashyap Chamarthy
wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 09:39:50PM -0700, Sukhdev Kapur wrote:
> > Oppss...sorry wrong link... please use this
> > http://paste.openstack.org/show/84073/.
>
> Just a friendly note -- pastebins usually expire, and
Well, Luke, this is collaborative effort by everybody. By having these CI
systems in place ensures that one person's code does not break other
person's code and vice versa. Therefore, having these CI systems
operational and voting 24x7 is a critical step in achieving this goal.
However, the detail
months. This
information is not available anywhere - hence, presenting this kind of
information on a dashboard created by Ilya would be very useful to the
community as well to the vendors..
thoughts?
-Sukhdev
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Sukhdev Kapur
wrote:
> Well, Luke, this
Folks,
Bob, Kyle, Mohammad, and I are here in Minneapolis for mid-cycle sprint.
Looking around the room I see everybody is busy with activities.
Under the circumstances, we are canceling today's ML2 meeting.
Sorry for late notice.
Thanks
-Sukhdev
___
O
The upgrade of Gerrit in the upstream had impacted the gerrit triggers for
"recheck no bug" and "recheck bug " in the downstream CI's that use
Gerrit plugin with Jenkins.
We have fixed the issue and have uploaded patch for the fix.
The following wiki has updated links to the correct patch, alo
Folks,
Just wanted to share with you that Arista CI has been up and running 24x7
since the beginning of this year with no down time.
This morning it posted a vote on 10,000th Neutron patch
cheers..
-Sukhdev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-
:19 PM, Salvatore Orlando
wrote:
> Congratulations!
> And to celebrate this milestone, I would consider running something more
> than ~280 api tests... perhaps also a few scenario tests?
>
> Salvatore
>
>
> On 7 August 2014 01:09, Sukhdev Kapur wrote:
>
>> Folks,
&g
There are few examples of ML2 mechanism drivers. You can look at Arista ML2
driver. We deal with the DB synchronization as well back-end
provisioning. We deal with back-end failures and roll-backs as well
synchronization between Neutron and back-end.
best of luck
-Sukhdev
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 a
Yes, we are working on putting together Arista Driver based upon this API.
As soon as it is ready, we will post it for review as well as others to
use as an example.
regards..
-Sukhdev
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Zang MingJie wrote:
> Hi Andre:
>
> will there be any example implementati
Hey Kevin,
It was always Henry's fault - now we can formally blame him :-):-)
Excellent move!! Well deserved addition!!!
Congratulations Henry!!!
-Sukhdev
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 10:49 PM, Kevin Benton wrote:
> Excellent addition! Remember everyone, if the feature you want doesn't
> make it
Hey Akihiro,
Thanks for arranging this. I did not see any link to RSVP.
I would love to attend this event - please add me to the list.
Thanks
-Sukhdev
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 9:23 AM, Akihiro Motoki wrote:
> Hi Neutron folks,
>
> We are pleased to announce Neutron social meet-up in Tokyo.
> T
Hi Vasyl,
I have not cross checked every patch in your list, but, the list looks
about right.
>From the Ironic, Nova, and Neutron point of the code is pretty much in
place with these patches.
In this week's meeting we discussed the plan for merging these patches.
Couple of things are holding us -
Folks,
We are canceling this week's Ironic-neutron integration meeting. I have a
family obligation to take care of and I have not been able to find a
replacement person who can chair this meeting. Therefore, we will cancel
this week's meeting.
Next meeting will take place on Monday, January 23 at
Hi Vasyl,
This is great. Kevin and I was working on the similar thing. I just
finished testing his patch and gave a +1.
This is a missing (and needed) functionality for getting the Ironic/Neutron
integration completed.
As Kevin suggests, it will be best if we can combine these approaches and
come
Folks,
This is to let everybody know that Liberty release for L2GW project is
released and is available at - https://pypi.python.org/pypi/networking-l2gw
Feel free to download it and use it. Please let us know if you see any
issue with it.
Authors of outstanding or new patches, please use your b
Hi Martinx,
L2GW is designed to bridge neutron networks with non-neutron networks to
form a L2 broadcast domain - not two neutron networks.
regards..
-Sukhdev
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 8:58 PM, Martinx - ジェームズ
wrote:
>
>
> On 11 May 2016 at 16:05, Sukhdev Kapur wrote:
>
>>
Folks,
Due the US holiday on 4th of July, there will be no meeting for L2 Gateway.
The channel will be available for anybody to use, should you need to
discuss anything during the meeting's time slot.
Happy 4th..
-Sukhdev
_
Folks,
Due the US holiday on 4th of July, there will be no meeting on
Ironic-Neutron Integration.
The channel will be available for anybody to use, should you need to
discuss anything during the meeting's time slot.
Happy 4th..
-Sukhdev
__
Hi Rossella,
Good to hear that you will follow through with this. Ironic is looking for
this API as well for bare metal deployments. We would love to work with you
to make sure that this API/Implementation works for all servers ( VMs as
well BMs)
Thanks
-Sukhdev
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 4:32 AM,
Hi Stable Maintainers,
We have a critical bug impacting customers production network. This is a
minor fix.
I would like to request an exception so that the customers do not have to
baby
sit this patch.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/309653/
Please allow this to be merged.
Thanks
-Sukhdev
Hi Dave,
I will get on it right away. Let me find Neutron Cores to review it.
Please stand by
-Sukhdev
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Dave Walker wrote:
>
>
> On 4 May 2016 at 17:55, Sukhdev Kapur wrote:
>
>> Hi Stable Maintainers,
>>
>> We have a cr
/plugins/ml2/drivers/arista/requirements.txt
>
> 2016-05-10 4:46 GMT+09:00 Dave Walker :
> >
> >
> > On 4 May 2016 at 17:55, Sukhdev Kapur wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Stable Maintainers,
> >>
> >> We have a critical bug impacting customers production
Yes, I am on it. I was waiting for a Green Light from few folks, which I
got this morning.
So, I will be working on releasing it sometime tomorrow.
Hope that is OK with everybody.
-Sukhdev
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 6:46 PM, Armando M. wrote:
>
>
> On 9 May 2016 at 18:03, Gary Kotton wrote:
>
>>
ty release.
Thanks
Sukhdev Kapur
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Hi Matt,
Here is the wiki - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/L2-GW
This should provide you all the information that you need.
-Sukhdev
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 1:14 PM, Matt Kassawara
wrote:
> Can you point me to the documentation?
>
> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Sukh
vStack.
>
> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Sukhdev Kapur
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Matt,
>>
>>
>> Here is the wiki - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/L2-GW
>>
>> This should provide you all the information that you need.
>>
>> -Sukhdev
>
We discussed this in ML2 sub-team meeting last week and felt the best
approach is to implement this agent in a separate repo.
There is already an on-going effort/plan for modular L2 agent. This agent
would be a perfect candidate to take on that effort and implement it for
macvtap agent. Once done,
r
> at least common code.
>
>
> But any other suggestions are highly welcome!
>
>
>
>
> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/208666/
>
>
>
> Andreas
> (IRC: scheuran)
>
>
> On Di, 2015-08-04 at 22:42 -0700, Sukhdev Kapur wrote:
> > We discussed this in ML2 sub
y
>> evaluating an approach to bring linuxbrige closer to ovs [1]. Maybe
>> that's the way to got. Do internal refactorings to bring things close to
>> each other and then see what might be possible to get a common agent or
>> at least common code.
>>
>>
>
Folks,
On account of Labor day holiday on Monday (9/7/15) in U.S.A, we will not be
holding Ironic-Neutron integration meeting.
On a separate note, Ironic core team is planning for Liberty-RC1 sometime
in third week of Sept. This means we need to test and complete all our
patches ASAP so that they
Folks,
We are planning on having ML2 coding sprint on October 6 through 8, 2015.
Some are calling it Liberty late-cycle sprint, others are calling it Mitaka
early-cycle sprint.
ML2 team has been discussing the issues related to synchronization of the
Neutron DB resources with the back-end drivers
t; I think its a very good idea and would love if i could participate in the
> talks (and hopefully the implementation as well)
>
> Thanks
> Gal.
>
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Sukhdev Kapur
> wrote:
>
>> Folks,
>>
>> We are planning on having ML2 co
Hi Kyle,
You have done wonders for the Neutron project. I hate to see you go, but,
fully understand your posiiton. We will miss you.
Best of luck
-Sukhdev
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
> I'm writing to let everyone know that I do not plan to run for Neutron PTL
> for a
Hey Kyle,
I am bit confused by this. I just checked networking-arista and see that
the co-owner of the project is openstackci
I also checked the [1] and [2] and the settings for networking-arista are
correct as well.
What else is missing which make you put networking-arista in the second
category
Hey Kyle,
I have updated the ownership of networking-l2gw. I have +1'd your patch. As
soon as it merges the ACLs for the L2GW project will be fine as well.
Thanks for confirming about the networking-arista.
With this both of these packages should be good to go.
Thanks
-Sukhdev
On Wed, Sep 30,
Hey Kyle,
We are down to couple of patches that are awaiting approval/merge. As soon
as it is done, I will let you know.
Thanks
-Sukhdev
On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Gary Kotton wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> Who will be creating the stable/liber
Hi Pavlo,
This feature spans three projects; Neutron, Nova, and Ironic. The code for
neutron modification was merged in Liberty, but,
because of the timeline/logistics, we missed the deadline to merge the Nova
and Ironic code in Liberty. Most of the patches are ready and the
functionality is being
Folks,
L2 Gateway team is pleased to announce the release of L2 Gateway API. This
API can be downloaded from [1]
If you plan on attending OpenStack summit in Vancouver next week, please
attend presentation [2] to find more details about this feature.
If you are not able to attend the summit, be s
Hey Salvatore,
Best of luck and thanks for all the hard work.
-Sukhdev
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Salvatore Orlando
wrote:
> After putting the whole OpenStack networking contributors community
> through almost 8 cycles of pedant comments and annoying "what if"
> questions, it is prob
Folks,
Starting next monday (June 1, 2015), we are kicking off weekly meeting to
discuss and track the integration of Ironic and Neutron (ML2).
We are hoping to implement the Networking support within Liberty cycle.
Come join and help us achieve this goal.
Anybody who is interested in this topic,
Folks,
Due to holiday on Monday in USA, there will be no L2 Gateway meeting on
February 15.
Feel free to use the channel for any discussions that you would want to
carry during that hour.
Thanks
-Sukhdev
__
OpenStack Develop
Folks,
Due to holiday on Monday in USA, there will be no Ironic-Neutron
integration meeting on February 15.
Feel free to use the channel for any discussions that you would want to
carry during that hour.
Thanks
Sukhdev
__
Op
Hi Marc,
I am driving the ironic-ml2 integration and introduced baremetal type for
vmic_type.
You can very much use the same integration here - however, I am not
completely clear about your use case.
Do you want neutron/ML2 to plumb the network for Manila or do you want to
find out what VLAN (segm
I just noticed that somebody posted this on the above meeting channel.
[23:22:31] Allah is doing
[23:22:42] sun is not doing Allah is doing
[23:22:42] *yamamoto* (~yamam...@i118-21-144-234.s30.a048.ap.plala.or.jp)
left IRC (Remote host closed the connection)
[23:22:54] moon is not doin
Folks,
We are canceling the meeting on Monday (2/16/2015) due to USA holiday. The
meeting will take place the following week Monday (2/23/2015).
The agenda for next week's meeting will be posted at -
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/L2Gateway
Thanks
-Sukhdev
_
Folks,
A great discussion. I am not expert at OVN, hence, want to ask a question.
The answer may make a case that it should probably be a ML2 driver as
oppose to monolithic plugin.
Say a customer want to deploy an OVN based solution and use HW devices from
one vendor for L2 and L3 (e.g. Arista o
Hi Ramy,
While I agree, in principal, with this line of thinking and goal, my
concern will be how much extra work is it going to create for existing CI
owners?
Our Ci system has been stable for a long time, and we put in a good amount
of effort to get it to that point. Our CI is not based upon zuu
framework can reduce/eliminate this effort, I
would like to at least understand it and discuss with the participants -
and, may join in.
Thanks for the good work.
-Sukhdev
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Anita Kuno wrote:
> On 04/20/2015 04:39 PM, Sukhdev Kapur wrote:
> >
If no body has claimed it yet, I will be happy to moderate Making Neutron
easy session -
https://www.openstack.org/summit/boston-2017/summit-schedule/events/18800/making-neutron-easy-for-people-who-want-basic-networking
I am already presenter into two sessions. Let me know if you want me to do
th
Rossella,
It has been nothing but pleasure working with you. Wish you best of luck in
your new endeavors.
regards..
-Sukhdev
On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 6:52 AM, Rossella Sblendido
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've moved to a new position recently and despite my best intentions I
> was not able to devote
Hey Neutron Folks,
Following our past tradition, we should have Neutron dinner while we are
all in Boston.
Miguel has few places in mind. I would propose that we nominate him as the
dinner organizer lieutenant.
Miguel, I hope you will take us to some cool place.
Thanks
-Sukhdev
On Thu, Apr 20,
gt;>> Let's plan for a social Wednesday night. I'll update this with a
>>> location once we find a place.
>>>
>>> On May 8, 2017 08:50, "MCCASLAND, TREVOR" wrote:
>>>
>>>> Looking forward to it! RSVP? +1
>>>>
>>
Folks,
I moderated the above referenced session at Boston Summit (sorry for
posting the summary a bit late - because of personal reason).
The etherpad of the session [1] gives you the details of the discussion.
Based upon the discussions, there were two critical take aways from this
session:
+1
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 4:23 PM, Miguel Lavalle wrote:
> Dear Neutrinos,
>
> Our social event will take place on Thursday September 12th at 7:30pm. The
> venue is going to be https://www.famousdaves.com/Denver-Stapleton. It is
> located 0.4 miles from the Renaissance Hotel, which translates
Hey Armando,
Your leadership will be sorely missed.
Cheers..
-Sukhdev
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 11:01 AM, Armando M. wrote:
> Hi neutrinos,
>
> To some of you this email may not come as a surprise.
>
> During the past few months my upstream community engagements have been
> more and more sporad
Hi Devananda,
This is a good summary. I think the proposal makes a lot of sense.
We need to agree to this as soon as possible so that we can get the Ironic
patches merged by this Friday - to meet the timelines.
Can you set up the number for the voice call so that we can all dial in,
discuss, if
Folks,
I am pleased to announce the addition of Ofer Ben-Yakov as new core team
member of L2 Gateway team.
Ofer has been working hard and contributing to solidify L2GW framework as
well adding new features to the L2GW.
The team welcomes Ofer on board and look forward to work with him.
Thanks a
Folks,
As you know we started out the charter to bring multi-tenancy for Bare
metal Service (Ironic) using Neutron networking in Liberty Cycle. We have
been meeting weekly to discuss this Ironic/ Neutron integration and make it
a reality.
We successfully completed the charter - thanks to everybo
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
