On 09/11/2014 04:52 PM, David Kranz wrote:
So we had a Bug Day this week and the results were a bit disappointing
due to lack of participation. We went from 124 New bugs to 75. There
were also many cases where bugs referred to logs that no longer
existed. This suggests that we really need to ke
Awesome! thanks for it!
Btw I guess this will automatically works for grenade, since we use
devstack to setup X-1 release, am I right? (and it's not a concern for
the upgrade part since the upgrade- scripts already contain
errexit trap on the cleanup functions right?)
--
mauro(sr)
On 02/27
Hello everybody!
In the last QA meeting I stepped ahead and volunteered to organize
another QA Bug Day.
This week wasn't a good one, so I thought to schedule it to the next
Wednesday (March, 19th). If you think we need more time or something,
please let me know.
== Actions ==
Basically I'm
Hey! I Just want to reminder everybody about the bug day tomorrow.
Thanks
On 03/12/2014 09:31 PM, Mauro S M Rodrigues wrote:
Hello everybody!
In the last QA meeting I stepped ahead and volunteered to organize
another QA Bug Day.
This week wasn't a good one, so I thought to schedule
ent status (and maybe assign someone else to take care of it).
- 4 are incomplete without answer and we may try to reach the
reporter to get an update.
Some actions, from the first email:
On 03/12/2014 09:31 PM, Mauro S M Rodrigues wrote:
== Actions ==
Basically I'm proposing the follow ac
Correct if I'm wrong but what value ips core api bring to us currently?
It offers you two calls:
GET on http://localhost:8774/v3/servers//ips => returns
instance ips
GET on http://localhost:8774/v3/servers//ips/{network-id}
=> returns instance ips that are member of the specified networl.
both
One more though, about os-multiple-create: I was also thinking to remove
it, I don't see any real advantage to use it since it doesn't offer any
kind of flexibility like chose different flavors, images and other
attributes. So anyone creating multiple servers would probably prefer an
external a
+1.. make sense to me, I always thought that was weird hehe
Say the word and we will remove it from v3.
On 07/01/2013 01:02 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 07/01/2013 11:47 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
Recently a colleague asked me whether their key pair from one of our
deployment zones would be usable in
yes, of course...
On 07/01/2013 02:07 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
We should not remove it from the v3 API until we know this will be
supported by keystone in Havana.
best,
Joe
sent on the go
On Jul 1, 2013 6:25 PM, "Mauro S M Rodrigues"
mailto:maur...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>>
