Why is that?
Thank you,
Mark
On 5/13/2016 7:21 PM, Dieterly, Deklan wrote:
If we allow Go, then we should also consider allowing JVM based languages.
-- Deklan Dieterly Senior Systems Software Engineer HPE On 5/13/16,
2:10 PM, "Adam Young" wrote:
>Can we just up and support Go, please? I'm
I'm not sure if it is necessary to write up or provide support on how to
use more than one deployment tool, but I think any work that
inadvertently makes it harder for an operator to use their own existing
deployment infrastructure could run some people off.
Regarding "deploy a VM to deploy bi
+1 to one more pass at using the same images. Doing so will become
practically impossible in a matter of weeks or months, and in the long
term the additional shared human resources outweigh the interpersonal
complexities (and for any who don't think so - maybe you're wasting your
time here?).
Sorry for the double post, but the part about people wasting their time
reads far more inflammatory than I really intended. I merely mean
community effort is a strong theme.
On 7/28/2016 11:20 AM, Mark Casey wrote:
+1 to one more pass at using the same images. Doing so will become
On 7/28/2016 11:29 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Fox, Kevin M's message of 2016-07-27 22:56:56 +:
I think that would be true, if the container api was opinionated. for example,
trying to map only a subset of the openstack config options to docker
environment variables. This would
On 9/8/2016 2:21 AM, Martin André wrote:
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 11:58 PM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
Sean,
I’d recommend deploy-hosts (I assume this is the bootstrap renamed?)
+1
I also like deploy-host better than the other proposed names. Can we
update the poll to include this option?
On 9/9/2016 2:08 PM, Mooney, Sean K wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Mark Casey [mailto:markca...@pointofrental.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 8, 2016 7:38 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [poll][kolla] Name of baremetal
