In recent history, we've been looking each week at stats from
http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/tripleo-openreviews.html to get a
gauge on how our review pipeline is tracking.
The main stats we've been tracking have been the "since the last revision
without -1 or -2". I've included some his
into the scripts to clarify the existing logic
I'll copy this message onto the mailing list as well - if we've
misunderstood what's needed here, or these plans don't meet your needs,
please follow up there with some more details.
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 9:10 AM, James Po
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Anne Gentle wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 6:17 PM, Rochelle.RochelleGrober <
> rochelle.gro...@huawei.com> wrote:
>
>> /flame-on
>> Ok, this is funny to some of us in the community. The general populace
>> of this community is so against the idea of man
That is correct, we intend that the undercloud should be designed with HA
in mind.
In terms of the design of TripleO, the devtest.sh implementation aims to
have this available as a default (see
http://docs.openstack.org/developer/tripleo-incubator/README.html#stage-2-being-worked-on
for some dated
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:40 PM, Thierry Carrez
wrote:
> James Polley wrote:
> >>> Point of clarification: I've heard PTL=Project Technical Lead
> >>> and PTL=Program Technical Lead. Which is it? It is kind of
> >>> import
se?
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 7:34 PM, Thierry Carrez
wrote:
> James Polley wrote:
> >
> > > However, Thierry pointed
> > > to https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/Foundation/Structure
> > which
> > > still refers to Project Technical L
One recurring topic in our weekly meetings over the last few months has
been the fact that it's taking us longer and longer to review and land
patches. Right now, http://www.nemebean.com/reviewstats/tripleo-open.html
has the following stats:
- Stats since the latest revision:
1. Average w
There was some discussion of this topic during today's meeting.
Full notes are at
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tripleo/2014/tripleo.2014-09-09-19.04.log.html
starting around 19:24
To summarise, we had one action item, and one comment from dprince which
attracted broad agreement, and wh
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 6:52 AM, James E. Blair wrote:
> Steven Hardy writes:
>
> > Yeah, I don't know what the optimal solution is - my attention has
> recently
> > been drawn to queries generated via gerrit-dash-creator, which I'm
> finding
> > help a lot.
>
> This is one of several great solu
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 6:26 PM, mar...@redhat.com
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as part of general housekeeping on our reviews, it was discussed at last
> week's meeting [1] that we should set workflow -1 for stale reviews
> (like gerrit used to do when I were a lad).
>
> The specific criteria discussed was
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 8:24 AM, James E. Blair wrote:
> "Sullivan, Jon Paul" writes:
>
> > I think this highlights exactly why this should be an automated
> > process. No errors in application, and no errors in interpretation of
> > what has happened.
> >
> > So the -1 from Jenkins was a react
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 5:21 PM, mar...@redhat.com
wrote:
> On 17/09/14 16:40, Charles Crouch wrote:
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> as part of general housekeeping on our reviews, it was discussed at last
> >> week's meeting [1] that we should set workflow -1 for stal
On 18 Sep 2014, at 6:06 pm, Sullivan, Jon Paul wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: James E. Blair [mailto:cor...@inaugust.com]
>> Sent: 17 September 2014 23:24
>> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Set WIP for s
I'd love to come, but at this stage I won't be able to travel before
about March 3, which sounds like it's a few weeks later than most
people were thinking of.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Robert Collins
mailto:robe...@robertcollins.net
>>
Date: 24 January 2014 08:47
Subject: [T
I'm not sure how well it would work here, but I've used Pagerduty.com for
something similar before.
The big up side of pagerduty is that it is pretty good at contacting people who
aren't at their computers.
It supports email notifications and webhooks for people who want to lots of
control ov
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Thierry Carrez
wrote:
> Tomas Sedovic wrote:
> > As you all (hopefully) know, our meetings alternate between Tuesdays
> > 19:00 UTC and Wednesdays 7:00 UTC.
> >
> > Because of the whining^W weekly-expressed preferences[1] of the
> > Europe-based folks, the latter m
At the mid-cycle, there was some discussion around using our weekly meeting
time to find 5 old reviews and assign people to shepherd those reviews -
either marking them as abandoned if there hasn't been any action, or
rounding up reviewers or people to help make changes if required to drive
it forw
Months ago, I pushed for us to alternate meeting times to something that
was friendlier to me, so we started doing alternate weeks at 0700UTC. That
worked well for me, but wasn't working so well for a few people in Europe,
so we decided to give 0800UTC a try. Then DST changes happened, and wiki
pag
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 3:22 PM, marios wrote:
> On 02/12/14 16:10, James Polley wrote:
> > Months ago, I pushed for us to alternate meeting times to something that
> > was friendlier to me, so we started doing alternate weeks at 0700UTC.
> > That worked well for me, but w
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Giulio Fidente wrote:
> On 12/02/2014 03:45 PM, Derek Higgins wrote:
>
>> On 02/12/14 14:10, James Polley wrote:
>>
>>> Months ago, I pushed for us to alternate meeting times to something that
>>> was friendlier to me, so
Hi all,
The other topic that has come up a few times in our meetings is: what value
do we get from these meetings?
There's no doubt that regular meetings provide value - but that doesn't
mean that everything we do in them is valuable.
As an example of something that I think doesn't add much valu
; On 12/02/2014 03:45 PM, Derek Higgins wrote:
> >> On 02/12/14 14:10, James Polley wrote:
> >>> Months ago, I pushed for us to alternate meeting times to something
> that
> >>> was friendlier to me, so we started doing alternate weeks at 0700UTC.
> >>&g
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:40 AM, marios wrote:
> On 04/12/14 11:40, James Polley wrote:
> > Just taking a look at http://doodle.com/27ffgkdm5gxzr654 again - we've
> > had 10 people respond so far. The winning time so far is Monday 2100UTC
> > - 7 "yes" a
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Jay Dobies wrote:
> As an example of something that I think doesn't add much value in the
>>> meeting - DerekH has already been giving semi-regular CI/CD status
>>> reports via email. I'd like to make these weekly update emails
>>> regular, and take the update off
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
> On 10/29/2014 10:17 AM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 7:25 AM, Hly wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Sent from my iPad
> >>
> >> On 2014-10-29, at 下午8:01, Robert van Leeuwen <
> robert.vanleeu...@spilgames.com> wrote:
> >>
> > I find
How do you find the Australian at the international online meeting?
You don't, they'll find you and make loud pointed remarks about your lack
of understanding of the ramifications of the world being round, the IDL,
and so on.
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Gregory Haynes
wrote:
> A couple we
My previous email is a long-winded whinging-aussie way of saying that I
think the bug-squashing day is a great idea, and I think Wednesday sounds
like a great day for it.
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 11:01 PM, James Polley wrote:
> How do you find the Australian at the international online meet
In the week since the last email we've had no major CI failures. This makes
it very easy for me to write my first CI report.
There was a brief period where all the Ubuntu tests failed while an update
was rolling out to various mirrors. DerekH worked around this quickly by
dropping in a DNS hack, w
Resending with correct subject tag. Never send email before coffee.
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 9:33 AM, James Polley wrote:
> In the week since the last email we've had no major CI failures. This
> makes it very easy for me to write my first CI report.
>
> There was a brief per
Is there a group hotel booking being arranged?
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 5:26 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
>
> I'm happy to announce we've cleared the schedule and the Mid-Cycle is
> confirmed for February 18 - 20 in Seattle, WA at HP's downtown offices.
>
> Please refer to the etherpad linked below for
I was looking at the new change screen on https://review.openstack.org
today[1] and it seems to do something vaguely similar.
Rather than saying "James polley made 4 inline comments", the contents of
the comments are shown, along with a link to the file so you can see the
context.
Hav
Tweaking subject as this seems to be broader than just the clients
It's been seen on os-apply-config as well; I've marked 1403557 as a dupe
1403510. It's also been reported on stackforge/yaql as well as
python-*client
There's been some discussion of this in #openstack-infra and it seems
dstufft h
and everyone has different preferences
> which is cool.
>
> -Rado
>
> On 12/17/14, 8:58 AM, James Polley wrote:
>
>> I was looking at the new change screen on https://review.openstack.org
>> today[1] and it seems to do something vaguely similar.
>>
>> R
We had a few topics come up in this week's meeting which we thought are
worth drawing everyone's attention to
You can see the full meeting logs at
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tripleo/2014/tripleo.2014-12-16-19.01.log.html
(the shorter meeting notes don't have much information)
*No mer
Two major CI outages this week
2014-12-12 - 2014-12-15 - pip install MySQL-python failing on fedora
- There was an updated mariadb-devel package, which caused pip install of
the python bindings to fail as gcc could not build using the provided
headers.
- derekh put in a workaround on the 15th but
Thanks for the alert
The earliest failure I can see because of this is
http://logs.openstack.org/43/141043/6/check-tripleo/check-tripleo-ironic-overcloud-precise-nonha/36c9771/
I've raised https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1405732 and I've put
some preliminary notes on
https://etherpad.open
> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/143501
> [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/143746/
>
> Kind regards,
> Denis M.
>
>
>> On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 10:59 PM, James Polley
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for the alert
>>>
>>> The earliest failure
It's been a bad week for CI, mostly due to setuptools.
Cores, please review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/144184/ immediately,
as CI is currently broken.
2014-12-19 - Neutron committed a change which had a symlink. This broke
"pip install neutron", which broke CI for around 6 hours.
2014-12-2
Thanks for the nomination Clint (and +1s from people who have already
responded)
At this stage, I believe we've traditionally[1] asked[2] the potential new
Core Reviewer to commit to 3 reviews per work-day.
I don't feel that that's a commitment I can make at this point. It's not
something I've be
To revive this thread... I'd really like to see us trying out alternate
meeting times for a while.
> Tuesdays at 14:00 UTC on #openstack-meeting-alt is available.
Looking at the iCal feed it looks like it's actually taken by Solum. But in
any case:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Robert Collin
Actually, it's probably best that we don't do the first meeting at a
US-unfriendly timezone in a week that the summit is on in Atlanta.
Maybe the week after summit, or even the second week after summit?
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 10:49 AM, James Polley wrote:
> To revive this thread.
I spoke to JP offline and confirmed that the link to 85418 should have been
a link to https://review.openstack.org/#/c/88252
I think that
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-incubator-rationalise-ui and
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-devtest.sh-refactoring-blueprintare
the closest t
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Jason Rist wrote:
> On 05/21/2014 02:22 PM, Sanchez, Cristian A wrote:
> > Hi,
> > In our team we’re planning to make some contributions to TripleO, after
> we met with Robert Collins in an Intel hosted meeting during Summit.
> > As our first step we want to use T
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Jay Dobies wrote:
> Currently, there is the following in the template:
>
>
>
> Proposed change
> ===
>
> [snip]
>
> Alternatives
>
>
> [snip]
>
> Security impact
> ---
>
>
>
> The unit tests assert the top and second level sect
Following a lengthy discussion under the subject "Alternating meeting tmie
for more TZ friendliness", the TripleO meeting now alternates between
Tuesday 1900UTC (the former time) and Wednesday 0700UTC, for better
coverage across Australia, India, China, Japan, and the other parts of the
world that
Thanks for putting this together Jaromir!
August 1 may be a problem for those of us from Australia - it's the day of
the OpenStack miniconf at Pycon-AU.
I don't know if any of us intended to go to that, but if we did we'd need
to leave no later than the 4:40pm flight on July 30 in order to make i
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 4:57 AM, Zane Bitter wrote:
> On 29/05/14 13:33, Mike Spreitzer wrote:
>
>> Devananda van der Veen wrote on 05/29/2014
>> 01:26:12 PM:
>>
>> > Hi Jaromir,
>> >
>> > I agree that the midcycle meetup with TripleO and Ironic was very
>> > beneficial last cycle, but this
> On 30 May 2014, at 8:13 pm, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I would like to propose to add Tuskar as a permanent topic to the agenda for
> our weekly IRC meetings. It is an official TripleO's project, there happening
> quite a lot around it and we are targeting for Juno to have somet
During yesterday's IRC meeting, we realized that our review stats are
starting to slip again.
Just after summit, our stats were starting to improve. In the 2014-05-20
meeting, the TripleO "Stats since the last revision without -1 or -2"[1]
looked like this:
1rd quartile wait time: 1 days, 1 hour
PR if people think it useful.
> >
> > I was about to mention this, too. The gerrit-dash-creator is fantastic.
> >
> > This one is missing the Tuskar-related projects (openstack/tuskar,
> > openstack/tuskar-ui and openstack/python-tuskarclient) and also
> openstack/os-
> > cloud-c
I believe this is the issue being tracked in
https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ci/+bug/1290562
The latest update to that issue has a suggested workaround.
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 6:32 PM, 黎林果 wrote:
> Hi,
>
>Anybody know the "Jenkins Fail"? I've encountered this fail in tow
> patches.
> On 20 Mar 2014, at 5:44 am, Clint Byrum wrote:
>
> Excerpts from Sullivan, Jon Paul's message of 2014-03-19 09:26:44 -0700:
>>> From: James Slagle [mailto:james.sla...@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: 18 March 2014 19:58
>>> Subject: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Alternating meeting time for more TZ
>>> frie
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 7:00 AM, James Polley wrote:
>
>
> On 20 Mar 2014, at 5:44 am, Clint Byrum wrote:
>
> Excerpts from Sullivan, Jon Paul's message of 2014-03-19 09:26:44 -0700:
>
> From: James Slagle [mailto:james.sla...@gmail.com
> ]
>
> Sent: 18 March
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 8:32 AM, James E. Blair wrote:
> James Polley writes:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 6:52 AM, James E. Blair
> wrote:
> >
> >> Steven Hardy writes:
> >>
> >> > Yeah, I don't know what the optimal solution is - my
The Summit Planning wiki page[1] links to an etherpad[2] for planning
topics for us to discuss at summit.
So far there's only one topic listed - which makes me happy, as it's a
topic I proposed (and will email about again next week after I'm back from
leave). Are there other things we want to talk
All three of the options presented here seem to assume that UIDs will always be
allocated at image-build time. I think that's because most of these UIDs will
be used to write files into the chroot at image-create time - if I could think
of some way around that, I think we could avoid this proble
> On 3 Oct 2014, at 00:25, Clint Byrum wrote:
>
> Excerpts from James Polley's message of 2014-10-01 22:37:25 -0700:
>> All three of the options presented here seem to assume that UIDs will always
>> be allocated at image-build time. I think that's because most of these UIDs
>> will be used
> On 3 Oct 2014, at 02:57, James Polley wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>> On 3 Oct 2014, at 00:25, Clint Byrum wrote:
>>
>> Excerpts from James Polley's message of 2014-10-01 22:37:25 -0700:
>>> All three of the options presented here seem to assum
> On 10 Oct 2014, at 07:32, Gregory Haynes wrote:
>
> Hello TripleO-ers,
>
> Last time around there was a lot of feedback that we should plan our
> mid-cycle metup a lot sooner, so lets do that! I've created a (mostly
> bare) etherpad here:
>
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kilo-tripleo-
I've got a new tool, currently called prep-source-repos, that I'd like to
set up as a new project. Most of the work was done by adamg and lifeless,
with a bit of polish from me to make it ready to be packaged.
The tool is something the tripleo-cd-admins have been using to let us
deploy a cloud fro
Minutes are at
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tripleo/2014/tripleo.2014-06-25-06.59.html
(or
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tripleo/2014/tripleo.2014-06-25-06.59.txt
if you prefer plain-text). For your convenience I've pasted them below.
During the meeting it was suggested we add
Until https://review.openstack.org/#/c/83250/, the setup-*-password scripts
used to drop password files into $CWD, which meant that if you ran the
script from a different location next time, your old passwords wouldn't be
found.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/83250/ changed this so that the defa
*cloud-password file location?
> >
> > On 06/25/2014 11:25 AM, mar...@redhat.com wrote:
> > > On 25/06/14 10:52, James Polley wrote:
> > >> Until https://review.openstack.org/#/c/83250/, the setup-*-password
> > >> scripts used to drop password files into $C
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 12:55 AM, Anita Kuno wrote:
> On 07/01/2014 08:52 AM, CARVER, PAUL wrote:
> > Anant Patil wrote:
> >> I use tmux (an alternative to screen) a lot and I believe lot of other
> developers use it.
> >> I have been using devstack for some time now and would like to add the
> op
It may not have been clear from the below email, but clarkb clarifies on
https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ci/+bug/1294381 that the infra team is
no longer maintaining pypi-mirror
This has been a very useful tool for tripleo. It's much simpler for new
developers to set up and use than a full ba
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 2:58 AM, Monty Taylor wrote:
> On 07/10/2014 02:44 PM, Richard Jones wrote:
> > On 10 July 2014 23:27, Mulcahy, Stephen wrote:
> >> When I last tested bandersnatch, it didn’t work well behind a proxy (in
> > fact most of the existing pypi mirroring tools suffered from the
> On 14 Jul 2014, at 08:08, Gregory Haynes wrote:
>
>
>> On Sun, Jul 13, 2014, at 02:36 PM, James Polley wrote:
>>
>> We're also thinking about how we continue to offer the pre-built wheels
>> for each of our build platforms. For infra, what I'
Due to the fact that the vast majority of the TripleO team are in a room
staring at me as I write this email, the weekly IRC meeting won't be
happening this week.
If you have any issues that need to be discussed this week, please bring
them up on IRC in #tripleo or via email.
_
As exciting as these emails are, I find them a bit unexciting. They don't
give me any context to let me know whether this was a one-off or if
something has been broken for a while.
Long term, having a dashboard (see https://review.openstack.org/#/c/192253/
for the spec) will help us get better vis
On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 5:09 AM, masoom alam
wrote:
> raise DistributionNotFound(req)\npkg_resources.DistributionNotFound:
> alembic<0.6.4,>=0.4.1\n'
>
It looks like your system is failing to find a version of alembic that
satisfies those requirements.
In your last post on this issue you said yo
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 9:12 AM, Monty Taylor wrote:
> On 04/12/2015 06:43 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
> > Right now we do something that upstream pip considers wrong: we make
> > our requirements.txt be our install_requires.
> >
> > Upstream there are two separate concepts.
> >
> > install_require
71 matches
Mail list logo
