Hi,
Robert Kukura's proposal does address the following:
1. Make it explicit to the user that an API is in "preview" until it's
moved out of the preview directories
2. One of the criteria to accept a BP for preview is for the functionality
to be optional via configuration. This will not impact th
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Armando M. wrote:
>
>
>> One advantage of the service plugin is that one can leverage the neutron
>> common framework such as Keystone authentication where common scoping is
>> done. It would be important in the policy type of framework to have such
>> scoping
>>
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Armando M. wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Armando M. wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
One advantage of the service plugin is that one can leverage the
neutron common framework such as Keystone authentication where common
scoping is done. It would be
.
Regards,
-hemanth
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 6:02 AM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Hemanth Ravi
> wrote:
> > Kyle,
> >
> > One Convergence CI has been fixed (setup issue) and is running without
> the
> > failures for ~10 days now. Updated t
Anita,
Yes, I'm the contact for One Convergence CI.
Thanks,
-hemanth
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Anita Kuno wrote:
> On 08/12/2014 03:23 PM, Hemanth Ravi wrote:
> > Kyle,
> >
> > One Convergence third-party CI is failing due to
> > https://bugs.la
Edgar,
Our CI is running the tests (non voting), but don't see it listed on the
review for any patch. Is this due to missing logs? I would like to confirm
this is the issue, will resolve this.
Thanks,
-hemanth
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Edgar Magana
wrote:
> Thank you Akihiro.
>
> I wil
Edgar,
CI name: One Convergence CI
The logs issue has been fixed and earlier tests were failing due to
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/114146
For reference:
1. Please take a look at the vote on patchset 7 in
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/114968/
2. Logs at
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/czydzz5
Hi,
We are developing a neutron plugin that works with our network controller.
Do we need to have 2 sets of tests for the plugin
i) tests that can be run against the network controller in our third party
test setup (to vote on changes to the plugin)
ii) tests that can be run in the OpenStack test
Hi,
Below are the set of steps we are using for Jenkins setup and would like
some clarifications reg some of the steps.
Under Jenkins/Configure
1. Source Code Management: to be git and point to the devstack URL
2. Build Triggers: Gerrit Event
3. Build/Execute Shell: Sequence of commands
Hi,
Resending on this thread
Below are the set of steps we are using for Jenkins setup and would like
some clarifications reg some of the steps.
Under Jenkins/Configure
1. Source Code Management: to be git and point to the devstack URL
2. Build Triggers: Gerrit Event
3. Build/Execu
Hi,
I would be interested in this discussion. Below are some time slot
suggestions:
Mon: 19:00, 20:00 UTC (11:00, 12:00 PST)
Wed: 20:00, 21:00 UTC (12:00, 13:00 PST)
Thu: 19:00, 20:00, 21:00 UTC (11:00, 12:00, 13:00 PST)
Thanks,
-hemanth
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Paul Michali wrote:
>
Hi,
We are in the process of submitting a third party Neutron plugin that uses
urllib3 for the connection pooling feature available in urllib3. httplib2
doesn't provide this capability.
Is it possible to add urllib3 to requirements.txt? If this is OK, please
advise on the process to add this.
Th
hanks,
-hemanth
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 6:08 PM, Mark McClain wrote:
> I'm interested to know why you are using urllib3 directly. Have you
> considered using the requests module? requests is built upon urllib3 and
> already a dependency of Neutron.
>
> mark
>
> On Feb 3,
Hi,
We are in the process of submitting a neutron third-party plugin and need
some advise on logging configuration to resolve the review comments for
this.
The plugin currently defines a log format and adds a log handler to forward
logs to a remote syslog server in this format. We would like to l
One Convergence CI did report the third party tests as failed, but is
configured not to vote. Should we turn on the voting?
Thanks,
-hemanth
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Carl Baldwin wrote:
> Aaron,
>
> I was thinking the same thing recently with this patch [1]. Patch
> sets 1-5 should ha
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Zane Bitter wrote:
> On 21/10/14 14:05, Subrahmanyam Ongole wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> We are in fact using OS::Neutron::PoolMember resource. I guess
>> ResourceGroup is the only iterative construct in Heat. Is the use case
>> supported today? I think this is more tha
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Hemanth Ravi
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Zane Bitter wrote:
>
>> On 21/10/14 14:05, Subrahmanyam Ongole wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> We are in fact using OS::Neutron::PoolMember resource. I gues
Kyle,
One Convergence CI has been fixed (setup issue) and is running without the
failures for ~10 days now. Updated the etherpad.
Thanks,
-hemanth
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Fawad Khaliq wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 8:56 AM, Kyle Mestery
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>1. PLUMgrid
>>
Hi,
Adding this CLI command seems to be a good way to provide support for the
second model. This can be submitted as a new review patch to work through
the approaches to implement this. I suggest the current CLI patch [1] be
reviewed for the existing spec and completed.
Ryan, would it possible fo
Hi,
I believe that the API has been reviewed well both for its usecases and
correctness. And the blueprint has been approved after sufficient exposure
of the API in the community. The best way to enable users to adopt GBP is
to introduce this in Juno rather than as a project in StackForge. Just as
Hi,
I agree that Option 1 would be best way to make the GBP API available to
operators and to make forward progress with the API.
Regards,
-hemanth
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 5:04 PM, Ivar Lazzaro wrote:
> Hi Pedro,
>
> I agree that having as much users/operators as possible using the API is
> th
Hi,
Is there a schedule published for the Neutron Icehouse design meetings
listed at http://summit.openstack.org/
Thanks,
-hemanth
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opens
22 matches
Mail list logo
