Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Improvements to current reviews

Hi, I took a look at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/105331/ and had one minor issue which I think can be addressed. Prior to approving we need to understand what the state of the V2 API will be. Thanks Gary From: Vijay Venkatachalam mailto:vijay.venkatacha...@citrix.com>> Reply-To: OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] fair standards for all hypervisor drivers

In the past there was smokestack that used a fedora version of libvirt. Any idea what happened to that? On 8/11/14, 12:53 PM, "Daniel P. Berrange" wrote: >On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 09:06:29AM -0400, Russell Bryant wrote: >> On 08/07/2014 08:06 PM, Michael Still wrote: >> > It seems to me that the

[openstack-dev] [Nova] PCI support

Hi, At the moment all of the drivers are required CI support. Are there any plans regarding the PIC support. I understand that this is something that requires specific hardware. Are there any plans to add this? Thanks Gary ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] PCI support

tack-dev] [Nova] PCI support Gary, Cisco is adding it in our CI testbed. I guess that mlnx is doing the same for their MD as well. -Robert On 8/11/14, 9:05 AM, "Gary Kotton" mailto:gkot...@vmware.com>> wrote: Hi, At the moment all of the drivers are required CI support. Are t

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack][InstanceGroup] metadetails and metadata in instance_group.py

On 8/11/14, 6:06 PM, "Dan Smith" wrote: >> As the person who -2'd the review, I'm thankful you raised this issue on >> the ML, Jay. Much appreciated. > >The "metadetails" term isn't being invented in this patch, of course. I >originally complained about the difference when this was being added:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] PCI support

uesday, August 12, 2014 at 10:25 AM To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Cc: Gary Kotton mailto:gkot...@vmware.com>> Subject: RE: [openstack-dev] [Nova] PCI support Hi Gary, Mellanox already established CI support on Mellanox SR-IOV NICs, as one of the jobs of

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] PCI support

sense? Thanks Gary From: Irena Berezovsky mailto:ire...@mellanox.com>> Date: Wednesday, August 13, 2014 at 9:01 AM To: Gary Kotton mailto:gkot...@vmware.com>>, OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: RE: [openstack-dev] [Nova] PCI support Hi Gary,

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Rotating the weekly Neutron meeting

Huge +1 On 8/13/14, 5:19 PM, "Paul Michali (pcm)" wrote: >+1 > >PCM (Paul Michali) > >MAIL Š..Š. p...@cisco.com >IRC ŠŠ..Š pcm_ (irc.freenode.com) >TW ŠŠŠ... @pmichali >GPG Key Š 4525ECC253E31A83 >Fingerprint .. 307A 96BB 1A4C D2C7 931D 8D2D 4525 ECC2 53E3 1A83 > > > >On Aug 13, 2014, at 10:05 A

Re: [openstack-dev] Enabling silent Docker tests for Nova?

+1 From: Eric Windisch mailto:ewindi...@docker.com>> Reply-To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Friday, August 15, 2014 at 9:45 PM To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: [openstack-dev] Enabling silent Docker tests for Nova? I have

[openstack-dev] [All] LOG.warning/LOG.warn

Hi, Over the last few weeks I have seen a number of patches where LOG.warn is replacing LOG.warning. I think that if we do something it should be the opposite as warning is the documented one in python 2 and 3 https://docs.python.org/3/howto/logging.html. Any thoughts? Thanks Gary __

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][core] Expectations of core reviewers

From: Joe Gordon mailto:joe.gord...@gmail.com>> Reply-To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Monday, August 18, 2014 at 9:31 PM To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][core] Expectations of core reviewers

[openstack-dev] [Nova][VMware] Minesweeper status

Hi, Minesweeper is back up and running - this is now called "Vmware NSX CI". A patch for the deprecation of the ESX driver resulted in endless Minesweeper failures (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/108854/). These were resolved by a number of patches, the last being https://review.openstack.org/#

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Author tags

Hi, A few cycles ago the Nova group decided to remove @author from copyright statements. This is due to the fact that this information is stored in git. After adding a similar hacking rule to Neutron it has stirred up some debate. Does anyone have any reason to for us not to go ahead with https:

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] libvirt version_cap, a postmortem

Hi, Very nice write up. I take my hat off for taking the time and doing a postmortem. As a community we really need to work on how we communicate with one another. At the end of the day we all have the common goal in the success of the project. At times I feel like things are done very quickly with

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Feature Freeze Exception process for Juno

On 9/3/14, 12:50 PM, "Nikola Đipanov" wrote: >On 09/02/2014 09:23 PM, Michael Still wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Nikola Đipanov >>wrote: >>> On 09/02/2014 08:16 PM, Michael Still wrote: Hi. We're soon to hit feature freeze, as discussed in Thierry's recent emai

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Averting the Nova crisis by splitting out virt drivers

Hi, I do not think that Nova is in a death spiral. I just think that the current way of working at the moment is strangling the project. I do not understand why we need to split drivers out of the core project. Why not have the ability to provide Œcore review¹ status to people for reviewing those p

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][FFE] Feature freeze exception for virt-driver-numa-placement

On 9/4/14, 4:30 PM, "Sean Dague" wrote: >On 09/04/2014 09:21 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 03:07:24PM +0200, Nikola Đipanov wrote: >>> On 09/04/2014 02:31 PM, Sean Dague wrote: On 09/04/2014 07:58 AM, Nikola Đipanov wrote: > Hi team, > > I am requesti

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Averting the Nova crisis by splitting out virt drivers

On 9/8/14, 7:23 PM, "Sylvain Bauza" wrote: > >Le 08/09/2014 18:06, Steven Dake a écrit : >> On 09/05/2014 06:10 AM, Sylvain Bauza wrote: >>> >>> Le 05/09/2014 12:48, Sean Dague a écrit : On 09/05/2014 03:02 AM, Sylvain Bauza wrote: > Le 05/09/2014 01:22, Michael Still a écrit : >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][neutron][cinder] Averting the Nova crisis by splitting out virt drivers

On 9/11/14, 2:55 PM, "Thierry Carrez" wrote: >Sean Dague wrote: >> [...] >> Why don't we start with "let's clean up the virt interface and make it >> more sane", as I don't think there is any disagreement there. If it's >> going to take a cycle, it's going to take a cycle anyway (it will >> pro

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][neutron][cinder] Averting the Nova crisis by splitting out virt drivers

On 9/11/14, 4:30 PM, "Sean Dague" wrote: >On 09/11/2014 09:09 AM, Gary Kotton wrote: >> >> >> On 9/11/14, 2:55 PM, "Thierry Carrez" wrote: >> >>> Sean Dague wrote: >>>> [...] >>>> Why don't we start with &

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] [Devstack][VCenter][n-cpu]Error: Service n-cpu is not running

Hi, I am not sure why your setup is not working. The Vmware configuration looks correct. Please note that the ML2 plugin is currently not supported when working with the Vmware driver. You should use traditional nova networking. Please note that there are plans in K to add this support. Thanks G

[openstack-dev] [oslo-vmware] Propose adding Radoslav to core team

Hi, I would like to propose Radoslav to be a core team member. Over the course of the J cycle he has been great with the reviews, bug fixes and updates to the project. Can the other core team members please update with your votes if you agree or not. Thanks Gary _

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] What's holding nova development back?

On 9/16/14, 11:12 AM, "Daniel P. Berrange" wrote: >On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 07:30:26AM +1000, Michael Still wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Russell Bryant >>wrote: >> > On 09/15/2014 05:42 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: >> >> On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 07:07:13AM +1000, Michael Still wr

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Schduler] Volunteers wanted for a modest proposal for an external scheduler in our lifetime

On 11/22/13 12:16 PM, "Soren Hansen" wrote: >I'd very much like to take part in the discussions. Depending on the >outcome of said discussion, I may or may not want to participate in >the implementation :) > >Soren Hansen | >https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=http://linux2go

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Proposal to add Matt Riedemann to nova-core

+1 On 11/23/13 4:53 PM, "Sean Dague" wrote: >+1 would be happy to have Matt on the team > >On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Brian Elliott >wrote: >> +1 >> >> Solid reviewer! >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >>> On Nov 22, 2013, at 2:53 PM, Russell Bryant wrote: >>> >>> Greetings, >>> >>> I would lik

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] future fate of nova-network?

On 11/22/13 2:47 PM, "Daniel P. Berrange" wrote: >On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 11:25:51AM +, John Garbutt wrote: >> >> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Russell Bryant >>wrote: >> In particular, has there been a decision made about whether it will >> definitely be deprecated in some (a

[openstack-dev] Gate failures

Hi, To whoever fixed the gate – Thanks! Can someone please let us know what the problems were. Thanks Gary ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] Scheduler sub-group agenda 11/26

Hi, Thanks. I think that it may also be good to discuss Robert Collins proposal of moving the scheduler out of Nova. Thanks Gary From: , Donald D mailto:donald.d.dug...@intel.com>> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Proposal to re-add Dan Prince to nova-core

+1 On 11/27/13 3:29 PM, "Andrew Laski" wrote: >+1 > >On 11/26/13 at 02:32pm, Russell Bryant wrote: >>Greetings, >> >>I would like to propose that we re-add Dan Prince to the nova-core >>review team. >> >>Dan Prince has been involved with Nova since early in OpenStack's >>history (Bexar timeframe

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Schduler] Volunteers wanted for a modest proposal for an external scheduler in our lifetime

On 11/28/13 12:10 AM, "Robert Collins" wrote: >On 25 November 2013 21:51, Sylvain Bauza wrote: >> As said earlier, I also would love to join the team, triggering a few >> blueprints or so. >> >> By the way, I'm currently reviewing the Scheduler code. Do you began to >> design the API queries o

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Schduler] Volunteers wanted for a modest proposal for an external scheduler in our lifetime

On 11/28/13 8:12 PM, "Robert Collins" wrote: >On 29 November 2013 04:50, Gary Kotton wrote: > >> I am not really sure how we can have a client tree without even having >> discussed the API's and interfaces. From the initial round of emails the >> intenti

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Schduler] Volunteers wanted for a modest proposal for an external scheduler in our lifetime

On 11/28/13 11:34 PM, "Robert Collins" wrote: >On 29 November 2013 09:44, Gary Kotton wrote: >> >> >> The first stage is technical - move Nova scheduling code from A to be. >> What do we achieve - not much - we actually complicate things - there is >

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] why are we backporting low priority v3 api fixes to v2?

From: Christopher Yeoh mailto:cbky...@gmail.com>> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Sunday, December 1, 2013 12:25 AM To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" mailto:openstack-dev@l

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Schduler] Volunteers wanted for a modest proposal for an external scheduler in our lifetime

On 12/2/13 5:39 PM, "Russell Bryant" wrote: >On 12/02/2013 10:33 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: >> Just because I'd like to argue - if what we do here is an actual >> forklift, do we really need a cycle of deprecation? >> >> The reason I ask is that this is, on first stab, not intended to be a >> ser

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Schduler] Volunteers wanted for a modest proposal for an external scheduler in our lifetime

On 12/2/13 5:33 PM, "Monty Taylor" wrote: > > >On 12/02/2013 09:13 AM, Russell Bryant wrote: >> On 11/29/2013 10:01 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: >>> Robert Collins wrote: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=https://etherpad.openstack.o rg/p/icehouse-external-scheduler&k=oIvRg1

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Blueprint: standard specification of guest CPU topology

Hi, I think that this information should be used as part of the scheduling decision, that is hosts that are to be selected should be excluded if they do not have the necessary resources available. It will be interesting to know how this is going to fit into the new scheduler that is being discussed

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Blueprint: standard specification of guest CPU topology

On 12/3/13 12:08 PM, "Daniel P. Berrange" wrote: >On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 01:47:31AM -0800, Gary Kotton wrote: >> Hi, >> I think that this information should be used as part of the scheduling >> decision, that is hosts that are to be selected should be exclud

[openstack-dev] [havana-stable] FFE request https://review.openstack.org/60651

Hi, We discovered a very serious issue whilst running the CI. The Vmwareminesweeper would fail due to being unable to schedule instances. The root cause was incorrect except handling. Would it be possible to please get this into the stable havana release. Thanks Gary

[openstack-dev] [Gating-Failures] Docs creation is failing

Hi, An example for this is: http://logs.openstack.org/94/59994/10/check/gate-nova-docs/b0f3910/console.html Any ideas? Thanks Gary ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openst

Re: [openstack-dev] [Gating-Failures] Docs creation is failing

Hi, Saw that this was dealt with in most projects. I have posted the Nova review - https://review.openstack.org/61329 Thanks Gary From: Administrator mailto:gkot...@vmware.com>> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Da

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova]

On 12/11/13 12:43 AM, "Matt Riedemann" wrote: > > >On Tuesday, December 10, 2013 4:17:45 PM, Maithem Munshed 71510 wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I was wondering, what is the reason behind having nova audit resources >> as opposed to using usage stats directly from what is reported by the >> compute dr

[openstack-dev] [nova] VM diagnostics - V3 proposal

Hi, At the moment the administrator is able to retrieve diagnostics for a running VM. Currently the implementation is very loosely defined, that is, each driver returns whatever they have to return. This is problematic in a number of respects: 1. The tempest tests were written specifically fo

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] VM diagnostics - V3 proposal

On 12/16/13 5:25 PM, "Daniel P. Berrange" wrote: >On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 06:58:24AM -0800, Gary Kotton wrote: >> Hi, >> At the moment the administrator is able to retrieve diagnostics for a >>running VM. Currently the implementation is very loosely defined,

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] VM diagnostics - V3 proposal

iel P. Berrange" wrote: >On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 03:37:39PM +, John Garbutt wrote: >> On 16 December 2013 15:25, Daniel P. Berrange >>wrote: >> > On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 06:58:24AM -0800, Gary Kotton wrote: >> >> I'd like to propose the following f

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][vmware]VMware VCenter Driver

Hi, Currently there are 2 VMware drivers: * VMwareVCDriver – this lets nova compute communicate with a vCenter server (which manages the ESX hosts) * VMwareESXDriver – this lets nova compute manage the ESX host Thanks Gary From: Ray Sun mailto:xiaoq...@gmail.com>> Reply-To: "OpenStack Dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Future meeting times

+1. It would be great to be able to attend the Nova meetings. On 12/18/13 4:29 PM, "Russell Bryant" wrote: >Greetings, > >The weekly Nova meeting [1] has been held on Thursdays at 2100 UTC. >I've been getting some requests to offer an alternative meeting time. >I'd like to try out alternating th

Re: [openstack-dev] Subject: [nova][vmware] VMwareAPI sub-team status 2013-12-08

Would it be possible that an additional core please take a look at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/51793/? Thanks Gary From: Shawn Hartsock mailto:harts...@acm.org>> Date: Wednesday, December 18, 2013 6:32 PM To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" mailto:openstack-de

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] VM diagnostics - V3 proposal

On 12/19/13 5:50 PM, "Daniel P. Berrange" wrote: >On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 04:28:30AM -0800, Gary Kotton wrote: >> Hi, >> Following the discussion yesterday I have updated the wiki - please see >> >>https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] VM diagnostics - V3 proposal

On 12/19/13 6:07 PM, "Daniel P. Berrange" wrote: >On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 08:02:16AM -0800, Gary Kotton wrote: >> >> >> On 12/19/13 5:50 PM, "Daniel P. Berrange" wrote: >> >> >On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 04:28:30AM -0800, Gary Kotton wro

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova]I want to add a hypervisor driver for Nova in icehouse

Hi, There are a number of things that you should be aware of: 1. You need the BP to be approved. I think that the first step here is to provide a milestone target. Then cross you fingers that a core or two will jump on and support it. 2. One of the prerequisites of all drivers is that they p

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Alembic migrations

Hi, Anyone else encounter the following exception: + /usr/local/bin/neutron-db-manage --config-file /etc/neutron/neutron.conf --config-file /etc/neutron/plugins/ml2/ml2_conf.ini upgrade head No handlers could be found for logger "neutron.common.legacy" INFO [alembic.migration] Context impl MySQL

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Alembic migrations

Zo8NPZyF6hgoMQu%2BfDtysg45MkPhCZFxPEq8%3D%0A&m=5K8MatoRoqaZFIRyem%2F4QffE%2FRuzaNXGWcSrXSTEWjg%3D%0A&s=117edb0d7e6ff16ef0ecaf8e45c4072c59ea01323eeecf77c28db39be6cc7a49> fixing this error. Thanks, Roman On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Gary Kotton mailto:gkot...@vmware.com>>

[openstack-dev] [nova] HyperV-CI

Hi, There seems to be an issue with the hyper CI. Please see - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/52687/. This code does is not related to the HyperV driver. Thanks Gary ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.opensta

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] VM diagnostics - V3 proposal

Hi, Following all of the discussion I have done the following: 1. Update the wiki with all of the details - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova_VM_Diagnostics 2. Renamed the BP. It is now called v3-diagnostics 3. Posted a patc

[openstack-dev] [nova] Turbo-hipster

Hi, It seems that she/he is behaving oddly again. I have posted a patch that does not have any database changes and it has give me a –1…. Happy new year Gary ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Turbo-hipster

EwdZOsbG6HW%2FAwjBP1GxhEprFcAcOx%2Btg9BHc4 >Q%3D%0A&s=4a4948f494e74e51749c2d43571071cdeaaef367a00a2f5ceca2ac06d2a0e862 > > >This review also had slowness in migration 206, but has been rechecked >by the developer and now passes. It wasn't on the pe

Re: [openstack-dev] [DevStack] Nominate Chmouel Boudjnah for core team

+1 On 1/6/14 7:55 PM, "Florent Flament" wrote: >+1 > >- Original Message - >From: "Sean Dague" >To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > >Sent: Monday, January 6, 2014 5:30:09 PM >Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [DevStack] Nominate Chmouel Boudjnah for >core tea

[openstack-dev] [Nova] libvirt unit test errors

Hi, Anyone aware of the following: 2014-01-07 11:59:47.428 | Requirement already satisfied (use --upgrade to upgrade): markupsafe in ./.tox/py27/lib/python2.7/site-packages (from Jinja2

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Vmware]Bad Performance when creating a new VM

Hi, In order for the VM to be booted the image needs to be on a datastore accessible by the host. By default the data tore will not have the image. This is copied from glance tot he datastore. This is most probably where the problem is. This may take a while depending on the connectivity between

[openstack-dev] [nova][turbo hipster] unable to rebase

Hi, Patch sets that are cascaded has have the following errors: "Database migration testing failed either due to migrations unable to be applied correctly or taking too long. This change was unable to be automatically merged with the current state of the repository. Please rebase your change an

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Vmware]Bad Performance when creating a new VM

minutes to upload to the cache. Please note that I am running on a virtual setup so thing take far longer than they would if it was bare metal Best Regards -- Ray On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Gary Kotton mailto:gkot...@vmware.com>> wrote: Hi, In order for the VM to be booted the image n

[openstack-dev] [Nova][Neutron][Temptest] Gating failures

Hi, I was looking into SSH failures and stumbled upon the following tempest issue. The validations would not take into account the neutron agent heartbeat timeout. This would cause tests to occasionally fail. In short there was a window of at most 4 second for the test test_list_agent to run in

[openstack-dev] [nova] Gate issues

Hi, 1 in 3 failures today are due to: 2014-01-23 11:54:03.879 | 2014-01-23 11:54:03.880

Re: [openstack-dev] [gantt] Scheduler sub-group meeting agenda 1/28

Hi, Just an update regarding the instance groups: 1. The API has been posted - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/62557/ 2. The CLI has been posted - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/32904/ Thanks Gary On 1/28/14 12:45 PM, "Khanh-Toan Tran" wrote: >Dear all, > >If we have time, I would like to d

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] vmware minesweeper jobs failing?

Hi, Lats week there were some infra problems. These have been addressed and minesweeper is back in action. Thanks Gary On 1/25/14 4:58 PM, "Matt Riedemann" wrote: >Seeing a few patches where vmware minesweeper is saying the build >failed, but looks like an infra issue? An example: > >https://url

[openstack-dev] [Nova] Minesweeper update

Hi, At the moment we have a terribly long queue for minesweeper. We are able to reduce this considerably by running tempest tests in parallel. We have encountered 2 race conditions when we do this and it would be very helpful if we can get the following patches in – they will help with the speed

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Neutron] nova-network in Icehouse and beyond

On 1/29/14 7:39 PM, "Russell Bryant" wrote: >On 01/29/2014 12:27 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 11:47:07AM -0500, Russell Bryant wrote: >>> Greetings, >>> >>> A while back I mentioned that we would revisit the potential >>>deprecation >>> of nova-network in Icehouse af

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Scheduler] Will the Scheuler use Nova Objects?

t I would like to clear up. In one scheduler/gantt meeting, Gary Kotton offered to convert the scheduler to use Nova objects. In another I heard that with the creation of Gantt, the scheduler would avoid using any Nova specific features including Nova objects. I can see that these things are evolvi

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] vmware minesweeper

Hi, The following patches will really help minesweeper: 1. Treat exceptions that are caused by parallel tests. This enables us to run parallel jobs (we have very promising results of running 8 parallel test jobs): https://review.openstack.org/#/c/70137/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/

[openstack-dev] [Nova] Image caching aging

Hi, It has come to my attention that this blueprint (https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/vmware-image-cache-management) has been deferred to the next milestone series. The blueprint ensures that the driver has aging for cached images. This is a critical issue for the driver and is impor

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][vmware] A new VMwareAPISession

Hi, Thanks for the detailed mail. For the first step of moving the code into OSLO we are trying to be as conservative as possible (similar to the fork lift of the scheduler code). That is, we are taking working code and moving it to the common library, not doing any rewrites and using the same func

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][vmware] A new VMwareAPISession

On 2/6/14 1:58 PM, "Matthew Booth" wrote: >On 06/02/14 11:24, Gary Kotton wrote: >> Hi, >> Thanks for the detailed mail. For the first step of moving the code into >> OSLO we are trying to be as conservative as possible (similar to the >>fork >> l

[openstack-dev] [Nova] Gate broken

Hi, Anyone aware of: 2014-02-08 06:49:42.022 | ${PYTHON:-python} -m subunit.run discover -t ./ ./nova/tests --load-list /tmp/tmp.aaa9SCw11a/tmpuyhFPj 2014-02-08 06:49:42.022

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Gate broken

st (not for usage questions)" mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Gate broken On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Gary Kotton mailto:gkot...@vmware.com>> wrote: Hi, Anyone aware of: It is caused the new boto 2.25 release. Joe Gordon filed a new bug

Re: [openstack-dev] [gantt] Scheduler sub-group meeting 2/11 - Cancel this week

Hi, I saw that one of the days there will be talk about Gantt. Would it be possible that people not at the local meet up can join this discussion? Thanks Gary From: , Donald D mailto:donald.d.dug...@intel.com>> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" mailto:open

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Nominate Oleg Bondarev for Core

+1 On 2/11/14 1:28 AM, "Mark McClain" wrote: >All- > >I¹d like to nominate Oleg Bondarev to become a Neutron core reviewer. >Oleg has been valuable contributor to Neutron by actively reviewing, >working on bugs, and contributing code. > >Neutron cores please reply back with +1/0/-1 votes. > >ma

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack][Nova][VCDriver] VMWare VCDriver problems

Hi, The commit https://github.com/openstack/nova/commit/c4bf32c03283cbedade9ab8ca99e5b13b9b86ccb added a warning that the ESX driver is not tested. My understanding is that there are a number of people using the ESX driver so it should not be deprecated. In order to get the warning removed we w

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack][Nova][VCDriver] VMWare VCDriver problems

ondition of between ESX servers in one cluster. 2014-02-13 16:47 GMT+08:00 Gary Kotton mailto:gkot...@vmware.com>>: Hi, The commit https://github.com/openstack/nova/commit/c4bf32c03283cbedade9ab8ca99e5b13b9b86ccb<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=https://github.com/openstack/nova/co

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][VMWare] VMwareVCDriver related to resize/cold migration

Hi, There are two issues here. The first is a bug fix that is in review: - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/69209/ (this is where they have the same configuration) The second is WIP: - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/69262/ (we need to restore) Thanks Gary From: Jay Lau mailto:jay.lau@gmail.

[openstack-dev] [infra] reverify/recheck

Hi, It seems that the command 'reverify bug ' is not working. Anyone else experienced this lately. Thanks Gary ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] reverify/recheck

ack-dev/2013-December/021649.html&k=oIvRg1%2BdGAgOoM1BIlLLqw%3D%3D%0A&r=eH0pxTUZo8NPZyF6hgoMQu%2BfDtysg45MkPhCZFxPEq8%3D%0A&m=B8yQ75uRFa7dyD%2FbgPgO%2FMT2x229MkK1vHWBVAzpFtM%3D%0A&s=d9cbcbde99b7c88c15ca138499de8f36edd4247ce351e41b241d675b09b79956> -Sylvain 2014-02-17 13:00 GMT+01:00 Gary Kotton

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] reverify/recheck

=Nf6%2FyHMSSchQO59xIcg6NKX1O2wlkkHHd42bYQim0k0%3D%0A& >s=8fc4d7e6970936977dc85989e4e7e9429afb15f5091a768efa4ce236417d9c9b > >Note that core team can trigger gate jobs by re-approving the patch. > >Thanks, >Akihiro > >(2014/02/17 22:03), Gary Kotton wrote: >> Hi, >> The "reverify no bug&qu

Re: [openstack-dev] call for help with nova bug management

I will help out. Thanks Gary From: Tracy Jones mailto:tjo...@vmware.com>> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 9:48 PM To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][libvirt] Is there anything blocking the libvirt driver from implementing the host_maintenance_mode API?

Hi, Plesae note that regarding the Vmware driver the maintenance mode only works with the ESX driver and not the VC driver. For the VC driver there is a patch in review - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/72143/ Thanks Gary From: Jay Lau mailto:jay.lau@gmail.com>> Reply-To: "OpenStack Develop

Re: [openstack-dev] [All] Fixed recent gate issues

On 2/19/14 10:31 PM, "Alan Pevec" wrote: >> Yeah it's pip weirdness where things falls apart because of version >>cap. It's >> basically installing bin/swift from 1.9 when it sees the version >>requirement >> but it leaves everything in python-swiftclient namespace from master. >> >> So I've ac

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][VMWare] VMware VM snapshot

Hi, This is something that would be nice to add as an extension. At the moment it is not part of our near term development plans. It would be nice to engage the community to discuss and see how this can be exposed correctly using the Nova API's. It may be something worthwhile discussing at the u

Re: [openstack-dev] What's the name of IRC channel for novaclient?

Hi, This is the same channel as nova – that is #openstack-nova Thanks Gary From: wu jiang mailto:win...@gmail.com>> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Monday, March 3, 2014 10:11 AM To: OpenStack Development Ma

[openstack-dev] [Nova] FFE Request: ISO support for the VMware driver

Hi, Unfortunately we did not get the ISO support approved by the deadline. If possible can we please get the FFE. The feature is completed and has been tested extensively internally. The feature is very low risk and has huge value for users. In short a user is able to upload a iso to glance the

[openstack-dev] Board election

Hi, When I log into the site I am unable to nominate people. Any ideas? I get: "Your account credentials do not allow you to nominate candidates." Any idea how to address that? Thanks Gary ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Integration with Ceph

Hi, One additional issue to take into account here is that the maximum free disk space reported by the backend may not be contiguous. Nova should also be made aware of that too. Thanks Gary On 12/1/14, 2:28 PM, "Roman Podoliaka" wrote: >Hi Sergey, > >AFAIU, the problem is that when Nova was desi

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Changes to the core team

+1 for both. Long overdue! From: Aaron Rosen mailto:aaronoro...@gmail.com>> Reply-To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Wednesday, December 3, 2014 at 4:13 AM To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Change

[openstack-dev] [Nova] MS Update

Hi, MS has been down for a few days. The following patches will help us get it up and running again: - requirements - https://review.openstack.org/139545 - oslo.vmware - https://review.openstack.org/139296 (depends on the patch above) - devstack - https://review.openstack.org/139515 Hopefully

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Spring cleaning nova-core

I agree -1 for Padraig On 12/6/14, 7:42 PM, "Jay Pipes" wrote: >On 12/04/2014 04:05 PM, Michael Still wrote: >> One of the things that happens over time is that some of our core >> reviewers move on to other projects. This is a normal and healthy >> thing, especially as nova continues to spin ou

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Core/Vendor code decomposition

Hi, I have raised my concerns on the proposal. I think that all plugins should be treated on an equal footing. My main concern is having the ML2 plugin in tree whilst the others will be moved out of tree will be problematic. I think that the model will be complete if the ML2 was also out of tree

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Spring cleaning nova-core

Please see http://stackalytics.com/report/contribution/nova-group/90. If we are following the average of 2 reviews per day then proposed list should be updated. On 12/7/14, 11:19 AM, "Michael Still" wrote: >On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 7:03 PM, Gary Kotton wrote: >> On 12/6/14,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Spring cleaning nova-core

On 12/7/14, 6:41 PM, "Dan Smith" wrote: >> I'm going to be honest and say I'm confused here. >> >> We've always said we expect cores to maintain an average of two >> reviews per day. That's not new, nor a rule created by me. Padraig is >> a great guy, but has been working on other things -- he

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Core/Vendor code decomposition

C Monday morning and we can discuss further if you still have questions and concerns. Thanks! Kyle On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 2:08 AM, Gary Kotton mailto:gkot...@vmware.com>> wrote: Hi, I have raised my concerns on the proposal. I think that all plugins should be treated on an equal footing

Re: [openstack-dev] [git] Rebase failed

Hi, I do the following: 1. Go to master branch. git checkout master 2. Get latest master code: git pull 3. Checkout you code: git checkout yourbranchname 4. Rebase this on the laster master: git rebase -i master 5. Resolve conflicts: git status (this will show conflicts) 6. Resol

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Spring cleaning nova-core

Hi, I would expect that if a core does not understand a piece of code then he/she would not approve it they can always give a +1 and be honest that it is not part of the code base that they understand. That is legitimate in such a complex and large project. We all make mistakes, it is the only w

Re: [openstack-dev] [git] Rebase failed

Hi, The whole review process starts again from scratch :). You can feel free to reach out the guys who originally reviewed and then go from there. Good luck! Thanks Gary From: Eduard Matei mailto:eduard.ma...@cloudfounders.com>> Reply-To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >