Hi Ernesto,
Let me answer the first question for you.
You can use GBP without OpenDaylight.
OpenDaylight has a separate Group-based Policy project, which might make you
wonder if you need it to run OpenStack GBP. Don’t worry, you can deploy
OpenStack GBP right away without OpenDaylight.
Best
Hi OpenStack Group-based Policy team,
As I unofficially said before, I am interested in bringing basic QoS to GBP via
the Neutron QoS API which currently offers bandwidth limitation at the port and
network level, since Liberty.
I have added the item to today's Meeting Agenda for an initial disc
Hi networking-sfc folks,
I can't seem to be able to deploy the current networking-sfc using DevStack and
my hint is that the latest review stack is dependent on previous patches that
have not been updated/rebased yet ([1] and [2]) - and are depending on outdated
patches.
In [3] you can see the
Hi GBP team,
Is the meeting today not going to happen due to US Thanksgiving?
Best regards,
Igor Duarte Cardoso
-
Intel Research and Development Ireland Limited
Registered in Ireland
Registered Office: Collinstown Industrial Park, Leixlip, County Kildare
Registered Number: 308263
__
Hi networking-sfc,
What is the recommended place to host the temporary installation instructions?
Best regards,
Igor.
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.o
Hi GBP,
While I was working on the QoS PoC for GBP I observed that policy targets
require to be associated to a PTG. They also don't seem to be updatable with a
different PTG, at least not with the CLI. However, looking at the API I see,
for policy targets:
'policy_target_group_id': {'
Hi networking-sfc,
As discussed at the last meeting I was to add the SFC Encapsulation use case to
the networking-sfc wiki:
#action paul, john igor to add use-cases to wiki
Where exactly is the place to insert use cases in the wiki? Is there one
already?
None of these seem to have any section f
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/ServiceChainUseCases
- Louis
From: Duarte Cardoso, Igor [mailto:igor.duarte.card...@intel.com]
Sent: Monday, May 23, 2016 9:14 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [networking-sfc
Hi all,
As Uri mentioned, there is a concrete proposal for an enhanced SFC API (with
support for open, IETF SFC Encapsulation [1] and NSH [2]) that was publicly
shared last month as a neutron spec at [3].
Service Function Chaining (SFC) is the effort of normalizing and standardizing
nomenclatu
"But if ODL is not supporting its own NSH capable dataplane, instead expecting
the user to run a patched OvS that doesn't have upstream acceptance then I
think we would be building a rickety tower by piling networking-sfc on top of
that unstable base."
ODL requires a patched OvS too [1].
[1]
Hi Tim,
+1
Focus on the plugin and API while improving the n-sfc<->ODL interaction to
match that.
In parallel, early (non-merged) support in OVS driver itself could be
attempted, based on the unofficial April 2016's NSH patches for OVS [1]. After
official supports gets merged, it would be less
Hi community and common classifier team,
In anticipation to the next common classifier meeting, I've added a meeting
agenda item to the next meeting's agenda [1] about the proposed "typed
classifications" model for the new common classifier.
The typed classifications model is described in [2, c
Hi Cathy, Louis,
I'll reupload the Neutron spec today to openstack/neutron-specs along with the
rst file and the neutron-classifier-inspired approach detailed, replacing [1]
and [2] from openstack/neutron, is that okay?
Review from the Neutron community, interested consumers and neutron-classif
, Duarte Cardoso, Igor
mailto:igor.duarte.card...@intel.com>> wrote:
Hi Cathy, Louis,
I'll reupload the Neutron spec today to openstack/neutron-specs along with the
rst file and the neutron-classifier-inspired approach detailed, replacing [1]
and [2] from openstack/neutron, is that okay?
Dear OpenStack Community,
We've been investigating options in/around OpenStack for supporting Service
Function Chaining. The networking-sfc project has made significant progress in
this space, and we see lots of value in what has been completed. However, when
we looked at the related IETF specs
API
On 20 April 2016 at 09:31, Duarte Cardoso, Igor
mailto:igor.duarte.card...@intel.com>> wrote:
Dear OpenStack Community,
We've been investigating options in/around OpenStack for supporting Service
Function Chaining. The networking-sfc project has made significant progress in
this
devref/sfc_driver.rst
[2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/300898/
[3]
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/networking-sfc/+spec/networking-sfc-ovn-driver
[4]
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/networking-sfc/+spec/tacker-networking-sfc-driver
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 1:24 AM, Duarte Cardoso, Igor
: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] neutron-classifier (CCF) at the PTG
Hi,
I have no opinion on where/when this should happen, but will be interested to
participate.
-Thomas
Tue Feb 14 2017 15:39:22 GMT+0100 (CET), Duarte Cardoso, Igor
Hi all,
Reminding that the Common Classification Framework meeting today hasn't been
canceled.
The meeting will be held on 1700 UTC @ #openstack-meeting.
Agenda:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/CommonFlowClassifier#Discussion_Topic_28_February_2017
Best regards,
Igor.
_
Hi community,
The following text was sent earlier to people that were recently engaged on the
Common Classification Framework (mainly at the PTG) and also earlier
contributors to neutron-classifier, I'm now resending this to the
community-scope, in case someone is very interested in joining our
Hi Vikash,
Please stick to pastebin for complete logs.
Check your migration files:
FAILED: Contract HEAD file does not match migration timeline head, expected:
48072cb59133
Best regards,
Igor.
From: Vikash Kumar [mailto:vikash.ku...@oneconvergence.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 7, 2017 5:03 PM
To:
hing here ? There is no private change
here. Below is the link for entire log.
http://paste.openstack.org/show/601870/
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 10:46 PM, Duarte Cardoso, Igor
mailto:igor.duarte.card...@intel.com>> wrote:
Hi Vikash,
Please stick to pastebin for complete logs.
Check your
Hi all,
After [1], a new meeting time/day has been decided.
With 6 votes, Tuesdays at 1400 UTC was the most wanted time slot [2].
Eavesdrop has been updated to reflect this [3] and all up-do-date information
can be found at [4].
Due to conflicting times at the IRC channel, the meeting also swi
Hi networking-sfc,
At the latest IRC meeting [1] it was agreed to split TAP from the possible
insertion modes (initial spec version [2]).
I took the ARs to propose coexistence of insertion modes, correlation and (now)
a new tap-enabled attribute, and send this email about possible directions.
- NSH
tap-enabled:
- False (default)
- True
Thanks,
Cathy
From: Duarte Cardoso, Igor [mailto:igor.duarte.card...@intel.com]
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2017 8:02 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing
L3 (default)
Correlation:
- MPLS
- NSH
tap-enabled:
- False (default)
- True
Thanks,
Cathy
From: Duarte Cardoso, Igor
[mailto:igor.duarte.card...@intel.c
Below,
Best regards,
Igor.
From: Vikash Kumar [mailto:vikash.ku...@oneconvergence.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 6:29 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
; Duarte Cardoso, Igor
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [networking-sfc] About insertion modes and SFC
Hi all,
Reminding that the Common Classification Framework meeting is today in about an
hour @ #openstack-meeting.
Agenda:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/CommonFlowClassifier#Discussion_Topic_4_April_2017
Best regards,
Igor.
Hi all,
Reminding that the Common Classification Framework meeting is today 1400 UTC @
#openstack-meeting.
Agenda:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/CommonClassificationFramework#Discussion_Topic_18_April_2017
Feel free to add more topics.
Best regards,
Igor.
Hi all,
Since David is off and there isn't anything particular to discuss except what's
in the spec, there will be no Common Classification Framework IRC meeting today.
Best regards,
Igor.
__
OpenStack Development Mailing L
Hi all,
Friendly reminder that there will be a Common Classification Framework meeting
in about half an hour at #openstack-meeting.
Today's agenda:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/CommonClassificationFramework#Discussion_Topic_30_May_2017
The spec seems to have reached general agreemen
Hi all,
Reminding that we have the Common Classification Framework meeting today, in
about an hour, at #openstack-meeting.
We'll talk about the status of the spec and implementation.
Agenda:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/CommonClassificationFramework#Discussion_Topic_13_June_2017
Be
Hi Rajeev, there are no meters as far as I know and I'm not aware of any plans
at the moment.
What else do you have in mind in terms of monitoring?
Best regards,
Igor.
From: rajeev.satyanaray...@wipro.com [mailto:rajeev.satyanaray...@wipro.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 25, 2017 1:10 PM
To: openstack-d
Hi all,
The repository has been updated to pass the gate:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/480199/.
There will be no meeting today as we have no outstanding topics to discuss and
are still working on submitting the first round of code of the Common
Classification Framework, which is due for pi
Hi all,
Reminding that we have the Common Classification Framework meeting today, in
about an hour, at #openstack-meeting.
We'll talk about the v0 code submission
Agenda:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/CommonClassificationFramework#Discussion_Topic_25_July_2017
Best regards,
Igor.
_
Hi all,
Reminding that we have the Common Classification Framework meeting today, in
about an hour, at #openstack-meeting.
It will be a short update about the code and plans for the PTG.
Agenda:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/CommonClassificationFramework#Discussion_Topic_8_August_201
Hi all,
Reminding that we have the Common Classification Framework meeting today, in
about an hour, at #openstack-meeting.
It will be a short update about the code and PTG.
Agenda:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/CommonClassificationFramework#Discussion_Topic_22_August_2017
Best regar
Hi Neutron,
The CCF team has been discussing what protocols should be supported on the
first version of the CCF (Common Classification Framework).
A potential list exhaustive list is available at [1]. However, this is likely
overkill in terms of protocols that will actually be used for classifi
There is no CCF meeting today since key people are on vacation.
Current work can be seen at
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/neutron-classifier.
Best regards,
Igor D.C.
__
OpenStack Development Mailing Lis
Hi all,
Common Classification Framework developers and interested parties are invited
for today's meeting. The agenda is below, feel free to add more topics.
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/CommonFlowClassifier#Discussion_Topic_6_December_2016
1700 UTC @ #openstack-meeting.
Best regard
Hi all,
Tomorrow, Tuesday 20th December 2016, there will be no Common Classification
Framework meeting, as there are no major topics to discuss.
Meanwhile we are working on an initial PoC for the framework. As a reminder,
please take a look at the respective spec:
https://review.openstack.org/#
Hi all,
Likewise, no meeting today.
The next meeting will be on January 17th.
Best regards,
Igor.
From: Duarte Cardoso, Igor [mailto:igor.duarte.card...@intel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2016 12:21 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: [openstack
Hi networking-sfc,
While working on the SFC Graphs patch, I observed the following limitation when
creating port-chains: http://paste.openstack.org/show/594387/.
My objective was to have 2 port-chains acting on the same classification of
traffic but from different logical source ports - my expe
Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [networking-sfc] Limitation on port chains + flow
classifiers
On 10 January 2017 at 14:13, Duarte Cardoso, Igor
wrote:
> Hi networking-sfc,
>
>
>
> While working on the SFC Graphs patch, I observe
Hi all,
Common Classification Framework developers and interested parties are invited
for today's meeting. The agenda is below, feel free to add more topics.
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/CommonFlowClassifier#Discussion_Topic_17_January_2017
1700 UTC @ #openstack-meeting.
Best regard
Hi,
There will be no Common Classification Framework this week.
The PTG PoC is still being worked on and is starting to look good, kudos to
David for most of the work so far.
Best regards,
Igor.
__
OpenStack Development Mai
Hi networking-sfc,
As part of my work regarding SFC Encapsulation and SFC Graphs, I exercised the
API to understand exactly what resources can be reused, to possibly relax a few
of the constraints when a chain is encapsulated end-to-end.
I'm requesting that the leaders and cores take a look at t
or relax the
rules/constraints you listed?
Could you clarify it?
Thanks,
Cathy
From: Duarte Cardoso, Igor [mailto:igor.duarte.card...@intel.com]
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 11:12 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: [openstack-dev] [networking-sfc] What res
urned from the egress port of a SF,
i.e., the SF is NSH-aware and it can receive, process and return the NSH, this
restriction does not apply.
- Louis
From: Duarte Cardoso, Igor [mailto:igor.duarte.card...@intel.com]
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 12:27 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (no
Hi all,
Common Classification Framework developers and interested parties are invited
for today's meeting. The agenda is below, feel free to add more topics.
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/CommonFlowClassifier#Discussion_Topic_14_February_2017
1700 UTC @ #openstack-meeting.
Me and Dav
Hi neutron,
Me and David would like to discuss the Common Classification Framework (CCF)
(current approach based on openstack/neutron-classifier) at the PTG but we
aren't sure if the main session is the appropriate forum for that or if we
should only have a meeting with the interested people an
+1
Best regards,
Igor.
From: Vasudevan, Swaminathan (PNB Roseville)
[mailto:swaminathan.vasude...@hpe.com]
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2017 8:30 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] - Neutron team social in Atlanta on
Thursd
Hi Common Classifier and OVS Flow Management community,
Cathy has kindly allowed me to drive the next common classifier/flow management
IRC meetings.
Time, location and recurrence are unchanged, so the next meeting will be next
Tuesday (27th September) at 17:00 UTC [1] on #openstack-meeting [2]
Hi Tim,
Just about the second part of your email:
> how are IETF SFC/NSH related API/plugin changes going?
I'm essentially finished with NSH encap support [1], just have to fix a few
bugs and write the tests. Then I will work on connecting port-chains together
so we can have SFC graphs, kind
Hi Common Classifier and OVS Flow Management community,
Feel free to add topics to the next meeting's agenda at:
https://wiki.openstack.org/w/index.php?title=Neutron/CommonFlowClassifier&action=edit§ion=5
Time, location and recurrence are unchanged, so the next meeting will be
tomorrow (11th Oct
Reminder that the meeting is in 1 hour,
Best regards,
Igor.
From: Duarte Cardoso, Igor [mailto:igor.duarte.card...@intel.com]
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2016 5:14 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [classifier] Common
Hi,
Two etherpads were created on the last meeting as placeholders to what can be
discussed at the summit regarding the common classification
framework/classifier and the OVS flow manager:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/neutron-common-classification-framework-barcelona
https://etherpad.opensta
Hi,
Two etherpads were created on the last meeting as placeholders to what can be
discussed at the summit regarding the common classification
framework/classifier and the OVS flow manager:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/neutron-common-classification-framework-barcelona
https://etherpad.opensta
:16010101T02
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=3
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
ORGANIZER;CN="Duarte Cardoso, Igor":MAILTO:igor.duarte.card...@intel.com
ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN=OpenStack
Developme
+1
Best regards,
Igor.
From: Ofer Ben-Yacov [mailto:ofer.benya...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 10:25 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Neutron team social event in Barcelona
+1
בתאריך 25 באוק׳ 2016 09:38,
Hi all,
We are at Ballroom B. First table on the right.
Best regards,
Igor.
-Original Appointment-
From: Duarte Cardoso, Igor [mailto:igor.duarte.card...@intel.com]
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 3:45 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); Miguel Angel
Hi all,
Common Classifier / OVS Flow Manager developers and interested parties are
invited for today's meeting. The agenda is below, feel free to add more topics.
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/CommonFlowClassifier#Discussion_Topic_22_November_2016
The time has not changed (still 1700
Hi networking-sfc's leaders, devs and users,
What do you think about having an IRC channel dedicated to networking-sfc's
discussions and sync?
For the time being I have joined #networking-sfc @ freenode, and will stay
online to keep it open.
Best regards,
Igor.
__
63 matches
Mail list logo
