Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [python-novaclient] microversions support

2015-12-05 1:23 GMT+08:00 Kevin L. Mitchell : > On Fri, 2015-12-04 at 18:58 +0200, Andrey Kurilin wrote: > > This week I added 5 patches to enable 2.7-2.11 microversions in > > novaclient[1][2][3][4][5]. I'm not bragging. Just want to ask everyone > > who are working on new microversions: Please,

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][docs][api] Propose Virtual Nova API Doc Sprint on Dec 8 and 9

Anita, thanks for the reminder, so cool we have such wiki, just add my one. 2015-12-07 21:49 GMT+08:00 Anita Kuno : > On 12/04/2015 09:48 AM, Alex Xu wrote: > > Just reminder the event which close the time, the virtual doc sprint is > > right next week. Welcome to join us! > &g

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

Hi, We have weekly Nova API meeting this week. The meeting is being held Tuesday UTC1200. The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI Please feel free to add items to the agenda. Thanks _

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] no user/project validation in "nova quota-show"?

2015-12-08 8:38 GMT+08:00 Kevin L. Mitchell : > On Mon, 2015-12-07 at 18:21 -0600, Chris Friesen wrote: > > Can someone explain why nova doesn't seem to be doing any validation in > the > > "nova quota-show" command? (At least in kilo/stable.) > > > > If I run: > > nova --debug quota-show --tena

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

Hi, We have weekly Nova API meeting today. The meeting is being held Wednesday UTC1300 and irc channel is #openstack-meeting-4. The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI Please feel free to add items to the agenda. Thanks ___

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

Hi, We have weekly Nova API meeting today. The meeting is being held Wednesday UTC1300 and irc channel is #openstack-meeting-4. The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI Please feel free to add items to the agenda. Thanks ___

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] API changes on limit / marker / sort in Newton

2016-05-20 20:05 GMT+08:00 Sean Dague : > There are a number of changes up for spec reviews that add parameters to > LIST interfaces in Newton: > > * keypairs-pagination (MERGED) - > > https://github.com/openstack/nova-specs/blob/8d16fc11ee6d01b5a9fe1b8b7ab7fa6dff460e2a/specs/newton/approved/keypa

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

Hi, We have weekly Nova API meeting today. The meeting is being held Wednesday UTC1300 and irc channel is #openstack-meeting-4. The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI Please feel free to add items to the agenda. Thanks ___

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

Hi, We have weekly Nova API meeting tomorrow. The meeting is being held Wednesday UTC1300 and irc channel is #openstack-meeting-4. The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI Please feel free to add items to the agenda. Thanks

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

Hi, We have weekly Nova API meeting today. The meeting is being held Wednesday UTC1300 and irc channel is #openstack-meeting-4. The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI Please feel free to add items to the agenda. Thanks ___

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Placement API WSGI code -- let's just use flask

2016-06-22 22:52 GMT+08:00 Chris Dent : > On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Sean Dague wrote: > > I honestly don't think raw WSGI is a bad choice here. People are going >> to be pretty familiar with it in related projects at this level. >> > > Yeah, WSGI itself is a framework, one that is clearly defined and w

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Do we require the 'next' link for paging, always?

t order explicitly, so I think they should depend on the DB implementation. Should we keep the old version API unspecified sort order? 2016-06-28 3:07 GMT+08:00 Matt Riedemann : > There are at least two changes up that add paging support to the API, one > for hypervisors and one for keypairs

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

Hi, We have weekly Nova API meeting today. The meeting is being held Wednesday UTC1300 and irc channel is #openstack-meeting-4. The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI Please feel free to add items to the agenda. Thanks ___

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Questions about instance actions' update and finish

2016-07-02 2:32 GMT+08:00 Sean Dague : > On 06/30/2016 08:31 AM, Andrew Laski wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016, at 11:11 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > >> On 6/29/2016 10:10 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > >>> On 6/29/2016 6:40 AM, Andrew Laski wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jun 28, 20

[openstack-dev] [Nova] [RFC] ResourceProviderTags - Manage Capabilities with ResourceProvider

This propose is about using ResourceProviderTags as a solution to manage Capabilities (Qualitative) in ResourceProvider. The ResourceProviderTags is to describe the capabilities which are defined by OpenStack Service (Compute Service, Storage Service, Network Service etc.) and by users. The Resourc

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] [RFC] ResourceProviderTags - Manage Capabilities with ResourceProvider

user want to write script to manage the Capabilities. Thinking the aggregate, the script will be very hard due to manage the mapping between aggregates and hosts. The script will be very easy with tags, due to tags just a set of string. 2016-07-11 19:08 GMT+08:00 Alex Xu : > This propose i

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] bug 1550250: delete_on_termination" flag: how to proceed?

2016-03-29 16:28 GMT+08:00 Nikola Đipanov : > On 03/29/2016 09:14 AM, Markus Zoeller wrote: > > The discussion around Bug 1550250 [1] doesn't show a clear path on how > > to proceed. In short, it's about if we want to keep the flag > > "delete_on_termination" for volumes which get migrated. Right

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

Hi, We have weekly Nova API meeting tomorrow. The meeting is being held Wednesday UTC1300 and irc channel is #openstack-meeting-4. The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI Please feel free to add items to the agenda. Thanks

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] API priorities in Newton

2016-03-31 5:36 GMT+08:00 Matt Riedemann : > > > On 3/30/2016 2:26 PM, Sean Dague wrote: > >> During the Nova API meeting we had some conversations about priorities, >> but this feels like the thing where a mailing list conversation is more >> inclusive to get agreement on things. I think we need

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] API priorities in Newton

2016-03-31 19:21 GMT+08:00 Sean Dague : > On 03/31/2016 04:55 AM, Alex Xu wrote: > > > > > > 2016-03-31 5:36 GMT+08:00 Matt Riedemann > > As discussed in IRC today, first steps (I think) are removing the > > deprecated 'osapi_v21.enab

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

Hi, We have weekly Nova API meeting tomorrow. The meeting is being held Wednesday UTC1300 and irc channel is #openstack-meeting-4. The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI Please feel free to add items to the agenda. Thanks

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

Hi, We have weekly Nova API meeting tomorrow. The meeting is being held Wednesday UTC1300 and irc channel is #openstack-meeting-4. The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI Please feel free to add items to the agenda. Thanks

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Proposing Andrey Kurilin for python-novaclient core

+1, thanks Andrey for helping on Microversions implementation a lot in python-novaclient! 2016-04-14 1:53 GMT+08:00 Matt Riedemann : > I'd like to propose that we make Andrey Kurilin core on python-novaclient. > > He's been doing a lot of the maintenance the last several months and a lot > of tim

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

Hi, We have weekly Nova API meeting today. The meeting is being held Wednesday UTC1300 and irc channel is #openstack-meeting-4. The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI Please feel free to add items to the agenda. Thanks ___

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

Hi, We have weekly Nova API meeting today. The meeting is being held Wednesday UTC1300 and irc channel is #openstack-meeting-4. The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI Please feel free to add items to the agenda. Thanks ___

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

Hi, We have weekly Nova API meeting today. The meeting is being held Wednesday UTC1300 and irc channel is #openstack-meeting-4. The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI Please feel free to add items to the agenda. Thanks ___

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

Hi, We have weekly Nova API meeting this week. The meeting is being held Tuesday UTC1200. The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI Please feel free to add items to the agenda. Thanks _

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Microversions support for extensions without Controller

Hi, Alexandre, Yes, I think we need pass the version into `server_update` extension point. My irc nick is alex_xu, let me know if you have any trouble with this. Thanks Alex 2015-12-13 2:34 GMT+08:00 Alexandre Levine : > Hi all, > > os-user-data extension implements server_create method to add

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Microversions support for extensions without Controller

Hi, Alexandre, we discussed this on api meeting http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova_api/2015/nova_api.2015-12-15-12.00.log.html Finally people agreement on merge os-user-data into servers. I will submit a patch up for this merge. Thanks Alex 2015-12-14 21:24 GMT+08:00 Alex Xu : >

[openstack-dev] [nova] No Nova API sub-team meeting in next weeks

Hi, Most of api sub-team members aren't there. So we will cancel nova api meetings in next two weeks: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI Hope everyone happy and enjoy the holidays! Thanks Alex __ OpenStack Deve

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

Hi, Welcome back everyone and happy new year! We have weekly Nova API meeting this week. The meeting is being held Tuesday UTC1200. The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI Please feel free to add items to the agenda. Thanks ___

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

Sorry for sending this mail late. We have weekly Nova API meeting today. The meeting is being held Tuesday UTC1200. The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI Please feel free to add items to the agenda. Thanks

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

We have weekly Nova API meeting tomorrow. The meeting is being held Tuesday UTC1200. The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI Please feel free to add items to the agenda. Thanks ___

[openstack-dev] [nova] Cancel Nova API sub-team meeting today

Hi, As most of peoples are in the mid-cycle meetup. So we will cancel the nova api meeting today. Thanks __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?s

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

We have weekly Nova API meeting tomorrow. The meeting is being held Tuesday UTC1200. The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI Please feel free to add items to the agenda. Thanks ___

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API meeting

Hi, We have weekly Nova API meeting this week. The meeting is being held tomorrow Friday UTC1200. In other timezones the meeting is at: EST 08:00 (Fri) Japan 21:00 (Fri) China 20:00 (Fri) United Kingdom 13:00 (Fri) The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wi

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack][nova] proxy quota/limits info from neutron

2015-07-15 5:14 GMT+08:00 Matt Riedemann : > > > On 7/14/2015 3:43 PM, Cale Rath wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I created a patch to fail on the proxy call to Neutron for used limits, >> found here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/199604/ >> >> This patch was done because of this: >> >> http://docs.openst

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Why is osapi_v3.enabled = False by default?

2015-07-16 7:54 GMT+08:00 Ken'ichi Ohmichi : > 2015-07-16 3:03 GMT+09:00 Sean Dague : > > On 07/15/2015 01:44 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > >> The osapi_v3.enabled option is False by default [1] even though it's > >> marked as the CURRENT API and the v2 API is marked as SUPPORTED (and > >> we've fro

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack][nova] proxy quota/limits info from neutron

2015-07-15 22:57 GMT+08:00 Matt Riedemann : > > > On 7/15/2015 3:24 AM, Alex Xu wrote: > >> >> >> 2015-07-15 5:14 GMT+08:00 Matt Riedemann > <mailto:mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>>: >> >> >> >> >> On 7/14/2015 3:43 PM, Cale

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Why is osapi_v3.enabled = False by default?

FYI, this should be part work of https://github.com/openstack/nova-specs/blob/master/specs/liberty/approved/nova-api-remove-v3.rst 2015-07-16 16:27 GMT+08:00 Alex Xu : > > > 2015-07-16 7:54 GMT+08:00 Ken'ichi Ohmichi : > >> 2015-07-16 3:03 GMT+09:00 Sean Dague : >> &

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API Meeting

Hi, We have weekly Nova API meeting this week. The meeting is being held tomorrow Friday UTC1200. In other timezones the meeting is at: EST 08:00 (Fri) Japan 21:00 (Fri) China 20:00 (Fri) United Kingdom 13:00 (Fri) The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wi

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] v3 Cleanup coming

Cool! Thanks for the work! 2015-07-21 22:51 GMT+08:00 Ed Leafe : > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > One of the tasks we have now that the 2.1 microversion API has become > the default is cleaning up the old references to 'v3', and moving all > the v2 code to a separate direct

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API team meeting

Hi, We have weekly Nova API meeting this week. The meeting is being held tomorrow Friday UTC1200. In other timezones the meeting is at: EST 08:00 (Fri) Japan 21:00 (Fri) China 20:00 (Fri) United Kingdom 13:00 (Fri) The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/w

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

Hi, We have weekly Nova API meeting this week. The meeting is being held tomorrow Friday UTC1200. In other timezones the meeting is at: EST 08:00 (Fri) Japan 21:00 (Fri) China 20:00 (Fri) United Kingdom 13:00 (Fri) The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/w

[openstack-dev] [nova] python-novaclient support microversions now

Hi, All, Currently we have microversions support in python-novaclient now! It’s time to submit microversions client support if your nova api server side patch merged. There is example how to add specific microversion in client https://review.openstack.org/#/c/136458/

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] change of day for API subteam meeting?

> 在 2015年8月8日，上午12:48，Sean Dague 写道： > > Friday's have been kind of a rough day for the Nova API subteam. It's > already basically the weekend for folks in AP, and the weekend is right > around the corner for everyone else. > > I'd like to suggest we shift the meeting to Monday or Tuesday in th

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting (New meeting time)

Hi, We have weekly Nova API meeting this week. The meeting is being held tomorrow Tuesday UTC1200. In other timezones the meeting is at: EST 08:00 (Fri) Japan 21:00 (Fri) China 20:00 (Fri) United Kingdom 13:00 (Fri) The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting (New meeting time)

> 在 2015年8月18日，上午10:07，Ed Leafe 写道： > > On Aug 17, 2015, at 9:08 AM, Alex Xu wrote: > >> We have weekly Nova API meeting this week. The meeting is being held >> tomorrow Tuesday UTC1200. >> >> In other timezones the meeting is at: >> >> EST

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] API: Question on 'Retry-After': 0 in HTTPForbidden

+1 for Retry-After is wrong for quota case > 在 2015年8月19日，下午1:32，GHANSHYAM MANN 写道： > > Retry-After __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subj

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] should we combine a set of minor microversion bump needed fix into one microversoin bump?

Let me wrote down what I’m analyse about this(I’m not good at this…and this spend another hour for me...): When OverQuota isn’t catched by API layer, we will get response as below: {"computeFault": {"message": "Unexpected API Error. Please report this at http://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] should we combine a set of minor microversion bump needed fix into one microversoin bump?

> 在 2015年8月21日，上午3:09，Jay Pipes 写道： > > On 08/20/2015 02:08 PM, melanie witt wrote: >> On Aug 20, 2015, at 5:40, Alex Xu wrote: >> >>> So user may wrote client like this: >>> >>> if response.status == 500 and ‘OverQuota’ in response.message: &

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] should we combine a set of minor microversion bump needed fix into one microversoin bump?

> 在 2015年8月21日，上午10:14，Alex Xu 写道： > >> >> 在 2015年8月21日，上午3:09，Jay Pipes > <mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com>> 写道： >> >> On 08/20/2015 02:08 PM, melanie witt wrote: >>> On Aug 20, 2015, at 5:40, Alex Xu >> <mailto:hejie...@int

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] API docs latest-n-greatest

> 在 2015年8月21日，上午9:48，Anne Gentle 写道： > > Hi all, > A couple of notes for API docs this week. One is, the spec to enable RST > builds to developer.openstack.org/api-guide/ > merged. The plan is > completely documented here: > http://specs.openstac

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

Hi, We have weekly Nova API meeting this week. The meeting is being held tomorrow Tuesday UTC1200. In other timezones the meeting is at: EST 08:00 (Tue) Japan 21:00 (Tue) China 20:00 (Tue) United Kingdom 13:00 (Tue) The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][manila] "latest" microversion considered dangerous

2015-08-29 2:07 GMT+08:00 Matt Riedemann : > > > On 8/28/2015 10:35 AM, Joe Gordon wrote: > >> >> On Aug 28, 2015 6:49 AM, "Sean Dague" > > wrote: >> > >> > On 08/28/2015 09:32 AM, Alex Meade wrote: >> > > I don't know if this is really a big problem. IMO, even with >> >

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

Hi, We have weekly Nova API meeting this week. The meeting is being held tomorrow Tuesday UTC1200. In other timezones the meeting is at: EST 08:00 (Tue) Japan 21:00 (Tue) China 20:00 (Tue) United Kingdom 13:00 (Tue) The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/

Re: [openstack-dev] Scheduler hints, API and Objects

2015-09-04 11:14 GMT+08:00 Ken'ichi Ohmichi : > Hi Andrew, > > Sorry for this late response, I missed it. > > 2015-06-25 23:22 GMT+09:00 Andrew Laski : > > I have been growing concerned recently with some attempts to formalize > > scheduler hints, both with API validation and Nova objects defining

Re: [openstack-dev] Scheduler hints, API and Objects

> 在 2015年9月7日，上午8:27，Ken'ichi Ohmichi 写道： > > f we allow customization of scheduler-hints like new filters, > out-of-tree filters without microversions, API users cannot know > available scheduler-hints parameter from microversions number. > That will be helpful for API users that nova can provi

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

Hi, We have weekly Nova API meeting this week. The meeting is being held tomorrow Tuesday UTC1200. In other timezones the meeting is at: EST 08:00 (Tue) Japan 21:00 (Tue) China 20:00 (Tue) United Kingdom 13:00 (Tue) The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/

Re: [openstack-dev] Should v2 compatibility mode (v2.0 on v2.1) fixes be applicable for v2.1 too?

> 在 2015年9月8日，下午6:45，Sean Dague 写道： > > On 09/06/2015 11:15 PM, GHANSHYAM MANN wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> As we all knows, api-paste.ini default setting for /v2 was changed to >> run those on v2.1 (v2.0 on v2.1) which is really great think for easy >> code maintenance in future (removal of v2 code

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

Hi, We have weekly Nova API meeting this week. The meeting is being held Tuesday UTC1200. In other timezones the meeting is at: EST 08:00 (Tue) Japan 21:00 (Tue) China 20:00 (Tue) United Kingdom 13:00 (Tue) The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meet

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

Hi, We have weekly Nova API meeting this week. The meeting is being held Tuesday UTC1200. In other timezones the meeting is at: EST 08:00 (Tue) Japan 21:00 (Tue) China 20:00 (Tue) United Kingdom 13:00 (Tue) The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meet

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [api] Nova currently handles list with limit=0 quite different for different objects.

Hi, Zhengyu, We discussed this in yesterday Nova API meeting. We think it should get consistent in API-WG. And there already have patch for pagination guideline https://review.openstack.org/190743 , and there also have some discussion on limits. So we are

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

Hi, We have weekly Nova API meeting this week. The meeting is being held Tuesday UTC1200. In other timezones the meeting is at: EST 08:00 (Tue) Japan 21:00 (Tue) China 20:00 (Tue) United Kingdom 13:00 (Tue) The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meeti

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] how to address boot from volume failures

2015-10-01 5:45 GMT+08:00 Andrew Laski : > On 09/30/15 at 05:03pm, Sean Dague wrote: > >> Today we attempted to branch devstack and grenade for liberty, and are >> currently blocked because in liberty with openstack client and >> novaclient, it's not possible to boot a server from volume using jus

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

Hi, We have weekly Nova API meeting this week. The meeting is being held Tuesday UTC1200. In other timezones the meeting is at: EST 08:00 (Tue) Japan 21:00 (Tue) China 20:00 (Tue) United Kingdom 13:00 (Tue) The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meeti

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

Hi, We have weekly Nova API meeting this week. The meeting is being held Tuesday UTC1200. In other timezones the meeting is at: EST 08:00 (Tue) Japan 21:00 (Tue) China 20:00 (Tue) United Kingdom 13:00 (Tue) The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meeti

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] [Nova] [Ironic] [Magnum] Microversion guideline in API-WG

2015-06-04 22:23 GMT+08:00 Ruby Loo : > > > On 4 June 2015 at 02:58, Xu, Hejie wrote: > >> ... >> And another guideline for when we should bump Mircoversion >> *https://review.openstack.org/#/c/187896/* >> >> >> > > This is timely because just this very

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] [Nova] [Ironic] [Magnum] Microversion guideline in API-WG

2015-06-05 19:35 GMT+08:00 Sean Dague : > On 06/05/2015 01:28 AM, Adrian Otto wrote: > > > >> On Jun 4, 2015, at 11:03 AM, Devananda van der Veen > >> mailto:devananda@gmail.com>> wrote: > >> > >> > >> On Jun 4, 2015 12:00 AM, "Xu, Hejie" >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > H

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] When to bump the microversion?

2015-06-05 5:35 GMT+08:00 Devananda van der Veen : > > On Jun 4, 2015 11:11 AM, "Chris Friesen" > wrote: > > > > On 06/04/2015 10:14 AM, Devananda van der Veen wrote: > >> > >> > >> On Jun 4, 2015 8:57 AM, "Monty Taylor" > > > > >> > So, seriously - let's grow up and start telling people that t

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] When to bump the microversion?

2015-06-04 23:27 GMT+08:00 Lucas Alvares Gomes : > Hi Ruby, > > Thanks for starting this thread, just like you I've been always > confused about when and when not bump the microversioning of the API. > > > Backwards compatible API adds with no user signaling is a fallacy > > because it assumes the

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] [Nova] [Ironic] [Magnum] Microversion guideline in API-WG

2015-06-12 7:52 GMT+08:00 Rochelle Grober : > Just want to add that for logging purposes, consistency, as Devananda > explains and Adrian and Sean agree, is really important. The number of > fields in a header response should be consistent. If the field is not > always used, a placeholder should

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][nova][ironic] Microversion API HTTP header

2015-06-16 5:58 GMT+08:00 Ed Leafe : > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > On 06/15/2015 04:30 PM, Michael Davies wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 5:15 AM, Kevin L. Mitchell > > > > wrote: > > > > Given the disagreement evinced by the res

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][nova][ironic] Microversion API HTTP header

2015-06-16 5:24 GMT+08:00 Clint Byrum : > Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2015-06-15 14:00:43 -0700: > > On 06/15/2015 04:50 PM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 01:07:39PM -0400, Jay Pipes wrote: > > >> It has come to my attention in [1] that the microversion spec for >

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][nova][ironic] Microversion API HTTP header

2015-06-16 18:57 GMT+08:00 Sean Dague : > On 06/15/2015 03:45 PM, Kevin L. Mitchell wrote: > > On Mon, 2015-06-15 at 13:07 -0400, Jay Pipes wrote: > >> The original spec said that the HTTP header should contain the name of > >> the service type returned by the Keystone service catalog (which is al

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][nova][ironic] Microversion API HTTP header

b/master/doc/api_samples/versions/versions-get-resp.json#L25-L26 > If we raise min_versions randomly...that may means we have 50 back-incompatible APIs in the world. So min_version will be raise rarely for keep back-compatible > > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Alex Xu wrote: > &

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Approval dates for non-priority specs

Hi, Rui, Abhishek, There is email can answer your question: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-June/068079.html Thanks Alex 2015-06-27 11:33 GMT+08:00 Rui Chen : > I have same question about this. > > My spec and blueprint: > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/169638/ > > h

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API meeting

Hi, We have weekly Nova API meeting this week. The meeting is being held tomorrow Friday UTC1200. In other timezones the meeting is at: EST 08:00 (Fri) Japan 21:00 (Fri) China 20:00 (Fri) United Kingdom 13:00 (Fri) The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wi

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Should we signal backwards incompatible changes in microversions?

If we support 2.x.y, when we bump 'x' is a problem. We didn't order the API changes for now, the version of API change is just based on the order of patch merge. For support 2.x.y, we need bump 'y' first for back-compatible changes I guess. As I remember, we said before, the new feature is the mot

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][neutron] How would nova microversion get-me-a-network in the API?

May I ask can we put those thing in to the CLI? I guess there should have similar discussion and I missed. As we didn't want to provide more neutron API proxy, this works sounds like adding more proxy. And API is more simple and more flexible, this make the API have more complex behaviour. Just lik

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][neutron] How would nova microversion get-me-a-network in the API?

2016-02-13 19:05 GMT+08:00 Andrew Laski : > > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2016, at 03:51 PM, Ed Leafe wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA512 > > > > On 02/12/2016 02:41 PM, Andrew Laski wrote: > > > > >> I think if the point of the experience for this API is to be > > >> working out

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Update on live migration priority

2016-02-13 0:21 GMT+08:00 Murray, Paul (HP Cloud) : > This time with a tag in case anyone is filtering… > > > > *From:* Murray, Paul (HP Cloud) > *Sent:* 12 February 2016 16:16 > *To:* openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > *Subject:* [openstack-dev] Update on live migration priority > > > > The obje

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

We have weekly Nova API meeting tomorrow. The meeting is being held Tuesday UTC1200. The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI Please feel free to add items to the agenda. Thanks ___

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][API] Does nova API allow the server_id parem as DB index?

I don't think our API supports get servers by DB index is good idea. So I prefer we remove it in the future with microversions. But for now, yes, it is here. 2016-02-16 8:03 GMT+08:00 少合冯 : > I guess others may ask the same questions. > > I read the nova API doc: > such as this API: > http://deve

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Should we signal backwards incompatible changes in microversions?

2016-02-16 9:47 GMT+08:00 GHANSHYAM MANN : > Regards > Ghanshyam Mann > > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Alex Xu wrote: > > If we support 2.x.y, when we bump 'x' is a problem. We didn't order the > API > > changes for now, the version of API c

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][API] Does nova API allow the server_id parem as DB index?

I think I miss one problem. I didn't found anywhere user can get the DB index from nova API. So even the 'show' action have the ability to show with DB index, but actually nobody can use that, due to there isn't a way to query the DB index for a server, except the user query the DB directly. For th

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Should we signal backwards incompatible changes in microversions?

2016-02-16 19:53 GMT+08:00 Sean Dague : > On 02/12/2016 03:55 PM, Andrew Laski wrote: > > Starting a new thread to continue a thought that came up in > > > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-February/086457.html > . > > The Nova API microversion framework allows for backwards

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

We have weekly Nova API meeting tomorrow. The meeting is being held Tuesday UTC1200. The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI Please feel free to add items to the agenda. Thanks ___

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

We have weekly Nova API meeting today. The meeting is being held Tuesday UTC1200. The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI Please feel free to add items to the agenda. Thanks __

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Non-Admin user can show deleted instances using changes-since parameter when calling list API

2016-03-03 2:11 GMT+08:00 Matt Riedemann : > > > On 3/2/2016 3:02 AM, Zhenyu Zheng wrote: > >> Hi, Nova, >> >> While I'm working on add "changes-since" parameter support for >> python-novaclient "list" CLI. >> >> I realized that non-admin can list all deleted instances using >> "changes-since" par

[openstack-dev] [nova] How to fix the wrong usage of 'format' jsonschema keyword in server create API

Hi, Due to this regression bug https://launchpad.net/bugs/1552888, found we are using 'formart' jsonschema keyword in wrong way. The 'format' is not only for string instance, but all the types. So checking the server create API, we have problem at https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nov

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] How to fix the wrong usage of 'format' jsonschema keyword in server create API

2016-03-07 19:23 GMT+08:00 Sean Dague : > On 03/07/2016 01:18 AM, Alex Xu wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Due to this regression bug https://launchpad.net/bugs/1552888, found we > > are using 'formart' jsonschema keyword in wrong way. The 'format' is not

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] How to fix the wrong usage of 'format' jsonschema keyword in server create API

2016-03-07 21:10 GMT+08:00 Jay Pipes : > On 03/07/2016 08:05 AM, Alex Xu wrote: > >> 2016-03-07 19:23 GMT+08:00 Sean Dague > <mailto:s...@dague.net>>: >> >> On 03/07/2016 01:18 AM, Alex Xu wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> &g

[openstack-dev] [nova] The vote for new Nova API sub-team meeting time

Hi, Looks like it's time to think about adjust nova api meeting now. I found really hard find a time which good for everyone. But let me give a try. I find out those time slots: 1400UTC: this is the time which closes to most people can join the meeting. But it's still very late or early for some

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] The vote for new Nova API sub-team meeting time

Hi, folks, >From the result of vote, all the peoples are available on Wednesday at 1300UTC. If no more questions, I think we can start with new time from next week. And we will switch to #openstack-meeting-4 channel. Thanks Alex 2016-03-09 15:56 GMT+08:00 Alex Xu : > Hi, > > Loo

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Nova PTL for Newton

Thanks for all your leadership, John! Really really appreciated all the help from you! 2016-03-12 3:22 GMT+08:00 John Garbutt : > Hi, > > It has been greatly rewarding serving you all as Nova PTL over the > Liberty and Mitaka cycles. I thank you all for the support, > encouragement and advice I h

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] The vote for new Nova API sub-team meeting time

2016-03-12 6:14 GMT+08:00 Tony Breeds : > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 07:16:41PM +0800, Alex Xu wrote: > > Hi, folks, > > > > From the result of vote, all the peoples are available on Wednesday at > > 1300UTC. If no more questions, I think we can start with new time from &

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

Hi, We have weekly Nova API meeting today with new meeting time and new irc channel. The meeting is being held Wednesday UTC1300 and irc channel #openstack-meeting-4. The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI Please feel free to add item

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

Hi, We have weekly Nova API meeting tomorrow. The meeting is being held Wednesday UTC1300 and irc channel is #openstack-meeting-4. The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI Please feel free to add items to the agenda. Thanks

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Feature Freeze Exception request for x509 keypairs

yea, this patch is on good shape. 2015-02-13 9:05 GMT+08:00 Ken'ichi Ohmichi : > 2015-02-12 21:20 GMT+09:00 Claudiu Belu : > > > > Hello. > > > > I would like to ask for a FFE for the x509 keypairs blueprint: > > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/keypair-x509-certificates > > > > This b

<    1   2   3   4   >