Dear Swifters,
In case you are interested in Storlets please read on.
Otherwise, please continue with your most likely 'backlogged inbox'
(and have a great day!)
I am trying to figure out whether it makes sense to ask for room
allocation for Storlets in the coming PTG [1]
Since we are not y
+1 for both
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 1:11 PM, Kumari, Madhuri
wrote:
> +1 for both.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Adrian Otto [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 8, 2016 12:36 AM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <
> openstack-dev
Hi,
No, you do not need to do a DB sync. This is just updating a constants – that
is the same constant definition was moved from one please to another. So it
should be backwards compatibale.
Thanks
Gary
From: Murali R
Reply-To: OpenStack List
Date: Sunday, November 13, 2016 at 9:01 AM
To: Open
Hi,
Today the mapping is 1:1. So if you want additional mappinsg to internal
networks then you can define more than one interface on your instance. Then map
each interface to the relevant network.
Thanks
Gary
From: huangdenghui
Reply-To: OpenStack List
Date: Saturday, November 12, 2016 at 10:2
Hi,
The case you are describing may be related to the previously discussed RFE
[1].
Having additional networks with FIP range attached via router interface
should be allowed from the API point of view, but may need some adaptations
to make it work properly. Please see the details in the discussion
Matt,
In Barcelona, there was a discussion amongst all projects that used service
VM's. I'm not able to find the actual meeting on my calendar now but here's
the list that I know of so far; I've tagged those projects in the subject
line of this top post.
Off the top of my head, the list includes
On 11/13/2016 9:20 AM, Amrith Kumar wrote:
Matt,
In Barcelona, there was a discussion amongst all projects that used service
VM's. I'm not able to find the actual meeting on my calendar now but here's
the list that I know of so far; I've tagged those projects in the subject
line of this top post
Technical Committee,
Please consider the following review for inclusion in the governance repository
once Michal has +1’ed it:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/396901/
Regards
-steve
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (n
That's fine, I will take care of putting it in the devref but this is the
only way in which I know to identify the "cats" involved :)
-amrith
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Riedemann [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2016 10:29 AM
> To: Amrith Kumar ; Ope
On 2016-11-12 17:44:42 -0800 (-0800), Clint Byrum wrote:
> https://www.apache.org/licenses/GPL-compatibility.html
>
> "This licensing incompatibility applies only when some Apache project
> software becomes a derivative work of some GPLv3 software, because then
> the Apache software would have to
On 11/13/2016 01:52 AM, Akira Yoshiyama wrote:
Hi Jay,
2016-11-13 3:12 GMT+09:00 Jay Pipes :
On 11/12/2016 09:31 AM, Akira Yoshiyama wrote:
Hi Stackers,
In TripleO, Ironic provides physical servers for an OpenStack
deployment but we have to configure physical storages manually, or
with any t
Akira,
Cinder has been working on creating a standalone service that could run on
bare metal nodes. [1]. I am thinking this could meet your needs or be
enhanced to meet your needs. Don't think we want to create a separate
service for it.
Jay
[1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/use-
Hi Horizon core team,
I propose Kenji Ishii as a new Horizon core reviewer. Kenji has been a
solid Horizon contributor for some time, with thoughtful and helpful
reviews showing good judgment and good knowledge of Horizion and
related systems. Please respond with your votes by Friday.
Thanks,
OK, I've started this at
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/396966/
Please feel free to update this patch set and add additional content for
projects that you are working on.
Thanks,
-amrith
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Riedemann [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent:
Hey manila memebers and driver maintainers,
I wanna set up an new thread to talk about the proper and better
exprienced way for both end users and drivers who want use or support IPv6
in manila, and I wish this can be discussed and optimised before the
spec[1] can get ready to the next re
+1 for both.
On 2016年11月08日 03:06, Adrian Otto wrote:
Magnum Core Team,
I propose Jaycen Grant (jvgrant) and Yatin Karel (yatin) as new Magnum Core
Reviewers. Please respond with your votes.
Thanks,
--
Best Regards,
Eli Qiao (乔立勇), Intel OTC.
__
Jaycen and Yatin,
You have each been added as new core reviewers. Congratulations to you both,
and thanks for stepping up to take on this new role!
Cheers,
Adrian
> On Nov 7, 2016, at 11:06 AM, Adrian Otto wrote:
>
> Magnum Core Team,
>
> I propose Jaycen Grant (jvgrant) and Yatin Karel (ya
Hi All,
Thanks all for your votes and support for this new Role.
It is an honour to work with all of you and will continue my participation in
the community.
Regards,
Yatin
From: Adrian Otto [[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2016 9:
Hello Keystone Devs,
I've been playing with an interesting idea in regards to the
authentications plugins in Keystone as I was curious if I could achieve
per user IP rules for authentication with the existing setup we have.
In short, yes, and here is an example plugin that seems to work:
http
+1, welcome Ruijie.
Regards,
xuhaiwei
-Original Message-
From: Yanyan Hu [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, November 11, 2016 3:28 PM
To: openstack-dev
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Senlin]Nominating Ruijie Yuan for Senlin core reviewer
Hi Senlin core team,
I'd like to nominate R
+1.
It's happy to work with Ruijie. Congratulations.
Best Regards,
XueFeng Liu
发件人: Haiwei Xu
收件人: "[email protected]"
,
日期: 2016-11-14 14:52
主题: Re: [openstack-dev] [Senlin]Nominating Ruijie Yuan for Senlin core
reviewer
+1, welcome Ruijie.
Regar
21 matches
Mail list logo
