Re: [openstack-dev] [nova, cinder, neutron] quota-update tenant-name bug

2015-07-31 Thread Salvatore Orlando
More comments inline. Salvatore On 31 July 2015 at 01:47, Kevin Benton wrote: > The issue is that the Neutron credentials might not have privileges to > resolve the name to a UUID. I suppose we could just fail in that case. > > As quota-update is usually restricted to admin users this should no

Re: [openstack-dev] How to use the log server in CI ?

2015-07-31 Thread Tang Chen
Hi Abhishek, I found out what was wrong. I didn't configure publisher in my jobs.. Sorry for the trouble. But I do think the document on github is not suitable for any beginner. So I think I will post some patches to provide more info for those who use this tool for the very first time wh

Re: [openstack-dev] Proposing Kanagaraj Manickam and Ethan Lynn for heat-core

2015-07-31 Thread Qiming Teng
+1 from qiming __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] What's Up, Doc? 31 July 2015

2015-07-31 Thread Lana Brindley
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi everyone, This week, like last, was all about the RST conversion. With just a 48 hour long sprint, the Install Guide is almost complete! A hearty congratulations to everyone who contributed. One of the interesting things about doing all these conve

[openstack-dev] 答复: Proposing Kanagaraj Manickam and Ethan Lynn for heat-core

2015-07-31 Thread Huangtianhua
+1 :) -邮件原件- 发件人: Steve Baker [mailto:sba...@redhat.com] 发送时间: 2015年7月31日 12:36 收件人: OpenStack Development Mailing List 主题: [openstack-dev] Proposing Kanagaraj Manickam and Ethan Lynn for heat-core I believe the heat project would benefit from Kanagaraj Manickam and Ethan Lynn having th

Re: [openstack-dev] 答复: Proposing Kanagaraj Manickam and Ethan Lynn for heat-core

2015-07-31 Thread Pavlo Shchelokovskyy
+1 for both from me, Best regards, On Fri, Jul 31, 2015, 11:20 Huangtianhua wrote: > +1 :) > > -邮件原件- > 发件人: Steve Baker [mailto:sba...@redhat.com] > 发送时间: 2015年7月31日 12:36 > 收件人: OpenStack Development Mailing List > 主题: [openstack-dev] Proposing Kanagaraj Manickam and Ethan Lynn for >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-07-31 Thread Mike Perez
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Gorka Eguileor wrote: > I know we've all been looking at the HA Active-Active problem in Cinder > and trying our best to figure out possible solutions to the different > issues, and since current plan is going to take a while (because it > requires that we finish

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] DAL implementation

2015-07-31 Thread joehuang
Hi, Vega, Thanks for your response. I think we can include the session in the context. Best Regards Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang ) From: Vega Cai [mailto:luckyveg...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, July 31, 2015 9:44 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [opensta

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Thoughts on things that don't make freeze cutoffs

2015-07-31 Thread John Garbutt
On 29 July 2015 at 19:13, Matt Riedemann wrote: > We talked a bit about this at the nova mid-cycle last week but I can't say I > completely remember all of the points made, since I feel like we talked > ourselves into a circle that got us back to more or less 'the current specs > and freeze proces

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Non-priority Feature Freeze is Tomorrow (July 30th)

2015-07-31 Thread John Garbutt
On 30 July 2015 at 09:56, John Garbutt wrote: > On 29 July 2015 at 19:20, John Garbutt wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Tomorrow is: Non-priority Feature Freeze >> >> What does this mean? Well... >> >> * bug fixes: no impact, still free to merge >> * priority features: no impact, still free to merge >> * clea

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] cross project communication: Return request-id to caller

2015-07-31 Thread Kekane, Abhishek
Hi Devs, I have modified the cross-project specs for request-id based on this analysis and submitted same for review. Please refer, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/156508/17/specs/return-request-id.rst and give your valuable feedback on the same. Thank you in advance. Abhishek Kekane -O

[openstack-dev] [Tempest]No way to skip S3 related tests

2015-07-31 Thread Jordan Pittier
Hi, With the commit [1] "minimize the default services" that happened in April, nova-objectstore is not run by default. Which means that by default, Devstack doesn"t provide any S3 compatible API (because swift3 is not enabled by default, of course). Now, I don't see any config flag or mechanism i

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Let's talk about API versions

2015-07-31 Thread Sean Dague
On 07/30/2015 04:58 PM, Devananda van der Veen wrote: > Thoughts? > > * I'm assuming it is possible to make micro version changes to the > 1.x API > as 1.10.1, 1.10.2,etc > > > Despite most folks calling this "microversions", I have been trying to > simply call this "API versi

[openstack-dev] [neutron] till when must code land to make it in liberty

2015-07-31 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Hi, as there is no official feature freeze in neutron anymore, there still must be a cut off date or at least a cut off time frame for liberty code. Can anyone tell me when this is (round about)? Is this liberty-3? I wonder if it's still possible to propose a RFE and get it into liberty... Than

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-07-31 Thread Gorka Eguileor
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 01:47:22AM -0700, Mike Perez wrote: > On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Gorka Eguileor wrote: > > I know we've all been looking at the HA Active-Active problem in Cinder > > and trying our best to figure out possible solutions to the different > > issues, and since current

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel][fuel-library] Librarian changes

2015-07-31 Thread Aleksandra Fedorova
> So far CI has been successful on all of these changes, and bvt is currently running. Small update - BVT test passed. On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 6:27 AM, Alex Schultz wrote: > Hey everyone, > > During on the fuel meeting today we discussed the librarian changes and > their status. > As part of thi

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [all][infra] CI System is broken

2015-07-31 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2015-07-31 14:49:52 +0800 (+0800), Gareth wrote: > Could this issue be fixed today? I believe it is, now that we've restarted with https://review.openstack.org/207675 applied. > Btw, is it possible to design a special mode for gate/zuul? If ops > switch to that mode, all new gerrit event can't

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][tempest] "kwargs" of service clients for POST/PUT methods

2015-07-31 Thread Jordan Pittier
Hi, So after I took a lot at Ken'ichi's recent proposed changes, I think this is the good approach. The kwargs approach has the good benefit of being generic so that if a consumer (say Nova) of the client class wants to add a new parameter to one of its API, it can do it without the need of updatin

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] [os-ansible-deployment] Kilo -> Liberty Upgrade Problems

2015-07-31 Thread Jesse Pretorius
I'm adding openstack-operators too as this is a discussion that I think it would be useful to have their input for. On 30 July 2015 at 19:18, Ian Cordasco wrote: > Hey all, > > As you may have seen elsewhere on openstack-dev, OpenStack is changing the > versioning for the service projects. This

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel][fuel-library] Librarian changes

2015-07-31 Thread Vladimir Kuklin
Folks I do actively support our initiative to use librarian to be as close as possible to upstream, but let's not merge such invasive changes until we announce Hard Code Freeze and create stable/7.0 branch. So far I put my -2 onto the first commit in the chain. Let's get through 7.0 and then land

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][Puppet] Keystone V2/V3 service endpoints

2015-07-31 Thread Jesse Pretorius
With regards to converting all services to use Keystone v3 endpoints, note the following: 1) swift-dispersion currently does not support consuming Keystone v3 endpoints [1]. There is a patch merged to master [2] to fix that, but a backport to kilo is yet to be done. 2) Each type (internal, admin,

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Release of python-fuelclient today

2015-07-31 Thread Roman Prykhodchenko
Folks, today I’m going to make a new public release of Fuel Client. If you badly need to merge something before that or have any objections, please let me know before 17:00 CEST (UTC+2). - romcheg signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail __

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [all][infra] CI System is broken

2015-07-31 Thread Joshua Hesketh
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 10:29 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2015-07-31 14:49:52 +0800 (+0800), Gareth wrote: > > Could this issue be fixed today? > > I believe it is, now that we've restarted with > https://review.openstack.org/207675 applied. > > > Btw, is it possible to design a special mode f

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][Puppet] Keystone V2/V3 service endpoints

2015-07-31 Thread Matthew Mosesohn
Jesse, thanks for raising this. Like you, I should just track upstream and wait for full V3 support. I've taken the quickest approach and written fixes to puppet-openstacklib and puppet-keystone: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/207873/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/207890/ and again to Fuel-L

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] till when must code land to make it in liberty

2015-07-31 Thread Kyle Mestery
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Andreas Scheuring < scheu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > Hi, > as there is no official feature freeze in neutron anymore, there still > must be a cut off date or at least a cut off time frame for liberty > code. > > Can anyone tell me when this is (round about)? I

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tempest]No way to skip S3 related tests

2015-07-31 Thread Matthew Treinish
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 12:47:55PM +0200, Jordan Pittier wrote: > Hi, > With the commit [1] "minimize the default services" that happened in April, > nova-objectstore is not run by default. Which means that by default, > Devstack doesn"t provide any S3 compatible API (because swift3 is not > enable

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Release of python-fuelclient today

2015-07-31 Thread Roman Prykhodchenko
Привет, нет, обычный how to contribute. > 31 лип. 2015 о 15:01 Roman Prykhodchenko написав(ла): > > Folks, > > today I’m going to make a new public release of Fuel Client. > If you badly need to merge something before that or have any objections, > please let me know before 17:00 CEST (UTC+2).

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Release of python-fuelclient today

2015-07-31 Thread Roman Prykhodchenko
Sorry, folks, I pressed a wrong button for replying. > 31 лип. 2015 о 15:56 Roman Prykhodchenko написав(ла): > > Привет, нет, обычный how to contribute. > >> 31 лип. 2015 о 15:01 Roman Prykhodchenko написав(ла): >> >> Folks, >> >> today I’m going to make a new public release of Fuel Client.

[openstack-dev] Nova-database update

2015-07-31 Thread Pradeep Kiruvale
Hi All, I am new to openstack. I have a problem in understanding of Nova-database update with the resources information. My understanding after going through the architecture documents and code is Nova-Database is the one which stores the resource information about the compute servers. The Nova-

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel][fuel-library] Librarian changes

2015-07-31 Thread Mike Scherbakov
Vladimir, can you please elaborate on "such invasive changes"? There was a plan developed, including risk mitigation, etc. - like do 'grep -r' to check, and revert the change all together right away if we see regression. So far, everyone was aligned with the plan. It was discussed yesterday during

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][Puppet] Keystone V2/V3 service endpoints

2015-07-31 Thread Rich Megginson
On 07/31/2015 07:18 AM, Matthew Mosesohn wrote: Jesse, thanks for raising this. Like you, I should just track upstream and wait for full V3 support. I've taken the quickest approach and written fixes to puppet-openstacklib and puppet-keystone: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/207873/ https://rev

Re: [openstack-dev] Proposing Kanagaraj Manickam and Ethan Lynn for heat-core

2015-07-31 Thread Zane Bitter
You forgot the [heat] tag ;) On 31/07/15 00:35, Steve Baker wrote: I believe the heat project would benefit from Kanagaraj Manickam and Ethan Lynn having the ability to approve heat changes. +1 for both and, at the risk of counting votes prematurely, welcome! - ZB Their reviews are valuable

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-07-31 Thread Joshua Harlow
Mike Perez wrote: On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Gorka Eguileor wrote: I know we've all been looking at the HA Active-Active problem in Cinder and trying our best to figure out possible solutions to the different issues, and since current plan is going to take a while (because it requires th

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] [os-ansible-deployment] Kilo -> Liberty Upgrade Problems

2015-07-31 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 7/31/15, 07:40, "Jesse Pretorius" wrote: >I'm adding openstack-operators too as this is a discussion that I think >it would be useful to have their input for. I've removed them from the CC since I don't think we're supposed to cross-post. >So what would the resulting version be? Would the

Re: [openstack-dev] Nova-database update

2015-07-31 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 7/31/2015 9:27 AM, Pradeep Kiruvale wrote: Hi All, I am new to openstack. I have a problem in understanding of Nova-database update with the resources information. My understanding after going through the architecture documents and code is Nova-Database is the one which stores the resourc

[openstack-dev] [Congress] meeting time change

2015-07-31 Thread Tim Hinrichs
Hi all, We managed to find a day/time where all the active contributors can attend (without being up too early/late). The room, day, and time have all changed. Room: #openstack-meeting-2 Time: Wednesday 5p Pacific = Thursday midnight UTC Next week we begin with this new schedule. And don't for

[openstack-dev] [nova][ironic] Scheduler filtering based on instances

2015-07-31 Thread Ed Leafe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 The scheduler in nova has a few filters (TypeAffinityFilter, SameHostFilter, DifferentHostFilter) that rely on information about the instances that already exist on a given host. Before Kilo, these filters made direct DB calls in order to make their

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel][fuel-library] Librarian changes

2015-07-31 Thread Vladimir Kuklin
Okay, folks, we had a short meeting to synchronize our vision of how it should happen. We will start by merging least-invasive modules like stdlib today and then continue doing merges one by one in discrete manner and revert things immediately if something goes wrong. So there is a list of action

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova, cinder, neutron] quota-update tenant-name bug

2015-07-31 Thread Fox, Kevin M
Ah. fixing it in python neutron client would be just fine too. Its just the unfortunate usability issue that your on the cli, try and update the tenant's quota and it says "ok, done" and it didn't actually do the thing you thought it did. If your using the api or rest, the documentation should b

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel][fuel-library] Librarian changes

2015-07-31 Thread Alex Schultz
Here is the proposed schedule and adjusted ordering based on risk due to code changes. Please let me know if you would like any of these dates changed. You will see that I have bumped modules that were upgrades to later so that we can stop prior to this changes if we feel they are too risky. We s

Re: [openstack-dev] [PATCH v4 2/5] ovn: Add bridge mappings to ovn-controller.

2015-07-31 Thread Russell Bryant
I found a couple of problems in this one. I'll fix it in v5 in a few minutes. On 07/31/2015 10:52 AM, Russell Bryant wrote: > Add a new OVN configuration entry in the Open_vSwitch database called > "ovn-bridge-mappings". This allows the configuration of mappings > between a physical network name

Re: [openstack-dev] [Congress] meeting time change

2015-07-31 Thread Tim Hinrichs
Peter pointed out that no one uses #openstack-meeting-2. So we'll go with #openstack-meeting. Here are the updated meeting details. Room: #openstack-meeting Time: Wednesday 5p Pacific = Thursday midnight UTC There's a change out for review that will update the meeting website once it merges. ht

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-07-31 Thread Mike Perez
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Joshua Harlow wrote: > ...random thought here, skip as needed... in all honesty orchestration > solutions like mesos > (http://mesos.apache.org/assets/img/documentation/architecture3.jpg), > map-reduce solutions like hadoop, stream processing systems like apache >

[openstack-dev] [app-catalog] App Catalog IRC meeting minutes - 7/30/2015

2015-07-31 Thread Christopher Aedo
This week we had a great meeting, and have had a lot of good conversations flowing on the IRC channel. We're solidifying the next steps on our roadmap, and Kevin Fox has made great progress on creating a Horizon panel to allow users to browse the catalog from Horizon as well as provide a one-click

Re: [openstack-dev] [os-ansible-deployment][openstack-ansible] Release review/bug list for tomorrow's meeting

2015-07-31 Thread Jesse Pretorius
On 29 July 2015 at 22:04, Jesse Pretorius wrote: > The following reviews are in-flight and are important for the upcoming > releases, and therefore there is a need for more reviews and in some cases > backports once the master patches have landed: > https://review.openstack.org/#/q/starredby:%22J

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] [os-ansible-deployment] Kilo -> Liberty Upgrade Problems

2015-07-31 Thread Jesse Pretorius
On 31 July 2015 at 16:59, Ian Cordasco wrote: > > So, I'm not proposing that yaprt be updated to forcibly add epochs or > anything else. What yaprt will generate is exactly what upstream > specifies. For example, glance would be version 11.0.0, nova would be > 12.0.0, etc. > > Giving a more concr

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-07-31 Thread Duncan Thomas
On 31 July 2015 at 20:40, Mike Perez wrote: > > Regardless, I want to know if we really need a DLM. Does Ceilometer > really need a DLM? Does Cinder really need a DLM? Can we just use a > hash ring solution where operators don't even have to know or care > about deploying a DLM and running multip

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-07-31 Thread Joshua Harlow
Mike Perez wrote: On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Joshua Harlow wrote: ...random thought here, skip as needed... in all honesty orchestration solutions like mesos (http://mesos.apache.org/assets/img/documentation/architecture3.jpg), map-reduce solutions like hadoop, stream processing systems l

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Let's talk about API versions

2015-07-31 Thread Dmitry Tantsur
2015-07-30 22:58 GMT+02:00 Devananda van der Veen : > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 10:21 AM Clint Byrum wrote: > >> Excerpts from Jim Rollenhagen's message of 2015-07-27 13:35:25 -0700: >> > Hi friends. >> > >> > Ironic implemented API "micro" versions in Kilo. We originally did this >> > to allow f

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder][Ironic] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-07-31 Thread Joshua Harlow
Joshua Harlow wrote: Mike Perez wrote: On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Joshua Harlow wrote: ...random thought here, skip as needed... in all honesty orchestration solutions like mesos (http://mesos.apache.org/assets/img/documentation/architecture3.jpg), map-reduce solutions like hadoop, stream

[openstack-dev] [fuel] [upgrade] Cluster Upgrade - FFE status

2015-07-31 Thread Oleg Gelbukh
Team, I'd like to inform you about status of FF Exception for Cluster Upgrade feature. The due date for the exception was Jul 30th. We had 4 patches to merge in the beginning of the work. During review it was decided that changes to the core of Nailgun should be split into separate CR, making it

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Let's talk about API versions

2015-07-31 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2015-07-31 04:14:54 -0700: > On 07/30/2015 04:58 PM, Devananda van der Veen wrote: > > > Thoughts? > > > > * I'm assuming it is possible to make micro version changes to the > > 1.x API > > as 1.10.1, 1.10.2,etc > > > > > > Despite most fo

Re: [openstack-dev] [Rally][Meeting][Agenda]

2015-07-31 Thread Roman Vasilets
Hi, its a friendly reminder that if you what to discuss some topics at Rally meetings, please add you topic to our Meeting agenda https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Rally#Agenda. Don't forget to specify by whom led this topic. Add some information about topic(links, etc.) Thank you for your a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Let's talk about API versions

2015-07-31 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 02:37:52PM -0700, Clint Byrum wrote: > Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2015-07-31 04:14:54 -0700: > > On 07/30/2015 04:58 PM, Devananda van der Veen wrote: > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > * I'm assuming it is possible to make micro version changes to the > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder][Ironic] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-07-31 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 12:47:34PM -0700, Joshua Harlow wrote: > Joshua Harlow wrote: > >Mike Perez wrote: > >>On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Joshua Harlow > >>wrote: > >>>...random thought here, skip as needed... in all honesty orchestration > >>>solutions like mesos > >>>(http://mesos.apache.or

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-07-31 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Mike Perez's message of 2015-07-31 10:40:04 -0700: > On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Joshua Harlow wrote: > > ...random thought here, skip as needed... in all honesty orchestration > > solutions like mesos > > (http://mesos.apache.org/assets/img/documentation/architecture3.jpg), > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-07-31 Thread Joshua Harlow
Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Mike Perez's message of 2015-07-31 10:40:04 -0700: On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Joshua Harlow wrote: ...random thought here, skip as needed... in all honesty orchestration solutions like mesos (http://mesos.apache.org/assets/img/documentation/architecture3.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-07-31 Thread Monty Taylor
On 08/01/2015 03:40 AM, Mike Perez wrote: > On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Joshua Harlow wrote: >> ...random thought here, skip as needed... in all honesty orchestration >> solutions like mesos >> (http://mesos.apache.org/assets/img/documentation/architecture3.jpg), >> map-reduce solutions like

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Let's talk about API versions

2015-07-31 Thread Devananda van der Veen
It sounds like we all agree -- the client we ship should default to a fixed, older version. Anyone who wants newer functionality can pass a newer version to their client. Here's the current state of things: server: - stable/kilo: 1.6 - current: 1.11 client: - stable/kilo: 1.6 - latest release (0

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-07-31 Thread Joshua Harlow
Monty Taylor wrote: On 08/01/2015 03:40 AM, Mike Perez wrote: On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Joshua Harlow wrote: ...random thought here, skip as needed... in all honesty orchestration solutions like mesos (http://mesos.apache.org/assets/img/documentation/architecture3.jpg), map-reduce solut

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] till when must code land to make it in liberty

2015-07-31 Thread Paul Carver
On 7/31/2015 9:47 AM, Kyle Mestery wrote: However, it's reasonable to assume the later you propose your RFE bug, the less of a chance it has of making it. We do enforce the Feature Freeze [2], which is the week of August 31 [3]. Thus, effectively you have 4 weeks to submit patches for new featur

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] till when must code land to make it in liberty

2015-07-31 Thread Armando M.
On 31 July 2015 at 20:33, Paul Carver wrote: > On 7/31/2015 9:47 AM, Kyle Mestery wrote: > > However, it's reasonable to assume the later you propose your RFE bug, the >> less of a chance it has of making it. We do enforce the Feature Freeze >> [2], >> which is the week of August 31 [3]. Thus, ef

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-07-31 Thread Avishay Traeger
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 2:51 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: > I hear tell that there a bunch of ops people who are in love with consul > At my company we love Consul. We found it to be very scalable and performant, gives us an easy-to-use k/v store, membership service, DNS, etc. We use it to load bala