Hey folks:
Just a quick reminder that there will be no Weekly Trove Meeting
on Wednesday, Dec 31st. We will resume the weekly meeting next
year on January 7th.
See you in the new year!
Thanks,
Nikhil
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
[email protected]
Hi folks,
We agreed to cancel next meeting scheduled on 01/06 due to extended
holidays in Russia. Next meeting is scheduled on 01/13.
--
Serg Melikyan, Senior Software Engineer at Mirantis, Inc.
http://mirantis.com | [email protected]
+7 (495) 640-4904, 0261
+7 (903) 156-0836
_
Hi
I probably won't be able to make it to the SF Bay Area, but I think it's a
good idea for those who can't go to Grenoble.
Lucas
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 9:58 PM, Clif Houck wrote:
> I'll attend. Whether it's in-person or remote is up in the air though.
>
> Clif
>
> On 12/30/2014 10:51 AM, Jay
I’ve been playing a bit with trying to get VPNaaS working post-repo split, and
haven’t been successful. I’m trying it a few ways with DevStack, and I’m not
sure whether I have a config error, setup issue, or there is something due to
the split.
In the past (and it’s been a few months since I ve
Not sure if I’m going crazy or what. I’m using DevStack and, after stacking I
tried booting a Cirros 3.2, 3.3, and Ubuntu cloud 14.04 image. Each time, the
image ends up in PAUSED power state:
ubuntu@juno:/opt/stack/neutron$ nova show peter
+--+---
I'm not a core but I'll most definitely show up to the SF bay area one
since it's close by for me. Elsewhere would be unlikely but since it's
nearby it would be very easy to just go to wherever it is in the area
and help out...
My 2 cents.
-Josh
Devananda van der Veen wrote:
I'm sending the
Hi all,
I am writing tests for the Magnum dbapi. I have several questions about its
implementation and appreciate if someone could comment on them.
* Exceptions: The exceptions below were ported from Ironic but don't seem
to make sense in Magnum. I think we should purge them from the code except
> On Dec 29, 2014, at 5:45 PM, Devananda van der Veen
> wrote:
>
> I'm sending the details of the midcycle in a separate email. Before you reply
> that you won't be able to make it, I'd like to share some thoughts / concerns.
>
> In the last few weeks, several people who I previously thought
Just more data…
I keep consistently seeing that on private subnet, the VM can only access
router (as expected), but on privateB subnet, the VM can access the private I/F
of router1 on private subnet. From the router’s namespace, I cannot ping the
local VM (why not?). Oddly, I can ping router1’s
On 12/31/2014 10:54 AM, Hongbin Lu wrote:
Hi all,
I am writing tests for the Magnum dbapi. I have several questions
about its implementation and appreciate if someone could comment on them.
* Exceptions: The exceptions below were ported from Ironic but don't
seem to make sense in Magnum. I t
Hi all,
I proposed https://review.openstack.org/#/c/143193 to ironic-python-agent, in
an attempt to make Hardware Manager loading more sane. As it works today, the
most specific hardware manager is the only one chosen. This means in order to
use a mix of hardware managers, you have to compose a
Hi
Sorry If I didn't understand clearly about it , looks to me
the hypervisor itself hosts the instances and it should have a IP with it
(like Linux host KVM instances, Linux is the hypervisor, the PC is the
host)
while the host is physical node and only to be used by
'h
On Wed, 2014-12-31 at 20:56 +0100, Chen CH Ji wrote:
> Sorry If I didn't understand clearly about it , looks to
> me the hypervisor itself hosts the instances and it should have a IP
> with it (like Linux host KVM instances, Linux is the hypervisor, the
> PC is the host)
>
ok, that make sense to me , thanks a lot
Best Regards!
Kevin (Chen) Ji 纪 晨
Engineer, zVM Development, CSTL
Notes: Chen CH Ji/China/IBM@IBMCN Internet: [email protected]
Phone: +86-10-82454158
Address: 3/F Ring Building, ZhongGuanCun Software Park, Haidian District,
Beijing 100193, PRC
Fro
I would welcome any patches to true this code up to be more appropriate for our
needs. We might as well trim cruft out now if we notice it. Our milestone-2
will add a lot of tests, so it would be great to get a clean start.
Adrian
Original message
From: Steven Dake
Date:12/31
On Dec 31, 2014, at 12:35 PM, Kevin L. Mitchell
wrote:
> but this is not necessarily the case for all virt drivers. For example,
> the host for Xen-based installations is often a separate VM on the same
> hypervisor, which would have its own distinct IP address.
This is quite similar to how O
Any exceptions on the Neutron side? It might not be notifying nova
that the network is ready.
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 8:41 AM, Paul Michali (pcm) wrote:
> Not sure if I’m going crazy or what. I’m using DevStack and, after stacking
> I tried booting a Cirros 3.2, 3.3, and Ubuntu cloud 14.04 image.
Bogdan,
Do you think that the existing post deployment hook is sufficient to
implement this or does additional plugins development need to be done to
support this
On Dec 30, 2014 3:39 AM, "Bogdan Dobrelya" wrote:
> Hello.
> There is a long living blueprint [0] about HA fencing of failed nodes
>
+1 we need more net testing pre deployment to recommend usable network
settings the first time. Settings like mtu gro gso need to be considered
too
On Dec 16, 2014 8:30 AM, "Sergey Vasilenko" wrote:
> Guys, it's a big and complicated architecture issue.
>
> Issue, like this was carefully research
19 matches
Mail list logo
