HI all,
Unfortunately i couldn't find any resource - blueprint/ document/ examples/
presentations about my below use case, hence the question i'm raising now
(if this is not the best place to ask, please let me know).
Having a group of 5 instances, i'd like to always maintain a minimum of 2
ins
On 10/22/2014 10:05 PM, David Vossel wrote:
- Original Message -
On 10/21/2014 07:53 PM, David Vossel wrote:
- Original Message -
-Original Message-
From: Russell Bryant [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: October 21, 2014 15:07
To: [email protected]
Sub
- Original Message -
> From: "Steve Gordon"
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Steve Gordon"
> > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > > F
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 07:58:28AM +0100, Daniel Comnea wrote:
> HI all,
>
>
> Unfortunately i couldn't find any resource - blueprint/ document/ examples/
> presentations about my below use case, hence the question i'm raising now
> (if this is not the best place to ask, please let me know).
>
>
Proposal C, VLAN-aware-VMs, is about trying to integrate VLAN traffic from VMs
with Neutron in a more tightly fashion.
It terminates the VLAN at the port connected to the VM. It does not bring in
the VLAN concept further into Neutron. This is done by mapping each VLAN from
the VM to a neutron
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2014-10-23 11:10:29 -0700:
> Hi folks,
> I've been looking at the convergence stuff, and become a bit concerned
> that we're more or less flying blind (or at least I have been) in trying
> to figure out the design, and also that some of the first implementat
> On Oct 23, 2014, at 11:27 AM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
>
> Mike, first, thanks for sending out this detailed analysis. I'm hoping
> that some of the DB experts from the Neutron side have read this.
> Would it make sense to add this to our weekly meeting [1] for next
> week and discuss it during the
