On 07/14/2014 04:34 AM, Vaddi, Kiran Kumar wrote:
Hi,
In the Juno summit, it was discussed that the existing approach of
managing multiple VMware Clusters using a single nova compute service
is not preferred and the approach of one nova compute service
representing one cluster should be looked i
1) Go over the use cases for a separate scheduler (ether pad
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/SchedulerUseCases )
2) Forklift status
3) Mid-cycle meetup
4) Opens
--
Don Dugger
"Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse." - D. Gale
Ph: 303/443-3786
___
Ope
any relation with this BP?
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/97715/6/specs/juno/nfv-unaddressed-interfaces.rst
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Isaku Yamahata
wrote:
>
> I'd like to request Juno spec freeze exception for ML2 OVS portsecurity
> extension.
>
> - https://review.openstack.org/#/c
> -Original Message-
> From: John Garbutt [mailto:j...@johngarbutt.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 21, 2014 6:54 PM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] [Spec freeze exception] Instance tasks
>
> On 18 July 2014 14:28, Andrew L
Based on the comments, received, I have filed following defects.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/heat/+bug/1346750
https://bugs.launchpad.net/heat/+bug/1346748
https://bugs.launchpad.net/heat/+bug/1346742
https://bugs.launchpad.net/heat/+bug/1346752
Hi Clint,
Persisting the events to the swift could
+1
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Matthew Treinish [mailto:mtrein...@kortar.org]
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 22. Juli 2014 00:34
> An: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> Betreff: [openstack-dev] [QA] Proposed Changes to Tempest Core
>
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I would like to propose 2 change
it is another BP about NFV:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/97715
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Isaku Yamahata
wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 02:52:04PM -0500,
> Kyle Mestery wrote:
>
> > > Following up with post SAD status:
> > >
> > >> * https://review.openstack.org/#/c/99873/ ML2 OVS
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 01:12:24PM +0800,
loy wolfe wrote:
> any relation with this BP?
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/97715/6/specs/juno/nfv-unaddressed-interfaces.rst
No direct relationship because the above blueprint doesn't specify
concrete plugin/mechanism driver, but it defines onl
Hello everyone,
I would like to request for juno spec freeze exception for "Add ironic boot
mode filters".
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/108582/
This change is required to support UEFI boot mode in ironic drivers. The
ironic spec to add UEFI support in ironic is still under review
https://rev
101 - 109 of 109 matches
Mail list logo