Hi guys
Being off some time from using tripleo and now I'm back in business.
I get this error during devtest_seed.sh run:
++ os-apply-config --key baremetal-network.seed.range-end --type raw
--key-default 192.0.2.20
+ BM_NETWORK_SEED_RANGE_END=192.0.2.20
+ setup-neutron 192.0.2.2 192.0.2.20 192.0
Please disregard, I sent this email to the openstack-dev, instead of the
openstack users mailing list.
Sorry for the noise.
2014-05-24 13:08 GMT+02:00 Ricardo Carrillo Cruz <
[email protected]>:
> Hi guys
>
> Being off some time from using tripleo and now I'm back in business.
> I
On 5/23/14, 10:54 PM, Armando M. wrote:
On 23 May 2014 12:31, Robert Kukura wrote:
On 5/23/14, 12:46 AM, Mandeep Dhami wrote:
Hi Armando:
Those are good points. I will let Bob Kukura chime in on the specifics of
how we intend to do that integration. But if what you see in the
prototype/PoC w
> One of the things that OpenStack does really well is review our process
> for various activities. I don't believe we have had a discussion in the
> past reviewing our electoral process and I think it would be good to
> have this discussion.
>
> There are two issues that I feel need to be addre
Hi Ceilometer folks,
Just in case you weren't following the thread on *-specs repos
being renamed from {project}-specs -> {program}-specs[1] ...
Note that there was a change of heart once the feedback from
the community indicated some concerns about the discoverability
of repos named for the les
On 2014/23/05 16:41, Jason Rist wrote:
Hi Jarda - How long do you expect the meeting to last? Thanks!
Hey Jason,
I expect similar as other projects have: 30 - 60 min. We have one hour
slot but it depends on the number of topics on agenda.
-- Jarda
___
Hi all,
Designate would like to apply for incubation status in OpenStack.
Our application is here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Designate/Incubation_Application
As part of our application we would like to apply for a new program. Our
application for the program is here:
https://wiki.opens
On 24 May 2014 05:20, Robert Kukura wrote:
>
> On 5/23/14, 10:54 PM, Armando M. wrote:
>>
>> On 23 May 2014 12:31, Robert Kukura wrote:
>>>
>>> On 5/23/14, 12:46 AM, Mandeep Dhami wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Armando:
>>>
>>> Those are good points. I will let Bob Kukura chime in on the specifics of
>>> how
Mohammad,
My responses are inline:
>Let's start from the question about Deny. There are no Deny actions. By
>default there is no connectivity. If you want to establish that you do it
>with Allow or other actions; otherwise no connectivity. Hence no need to
>have Deny.
This makes sense.
>The pol
Guys,
I now how to reproduce this and I filled a BUG report about it, here:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1322945
It seems that a regular user can breaks the Neutron L3 Router, by "Adding a
Interface" to its Namespace Router, that is attached to a IPv6 private
subnet, it also breaks an
10 matches
Mail list logo
