On 03/19/2014 06:09 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> The ceilometer collector is meant to scale horizontally. Have you tried
> configuring the test environment to run more than one copy, to process
> the notifications more quickly?
The ceilometer collector is already one of the top running processes on
I went ahead and made an editing pass over our design doc to reflect the
changes described below. (I moved most of the old content into the final
section focused on future work.) Overall, I'd say it simplifies the story and
implementation considerably. We can always revert if anyone has serio
On 19/03/14 06:57, James Slagle wrote:
> Our current meeting time is Tuesdays at 19:00 UTC. I think this works
> ok for most folks in and around North America.
>
> It was proposed during today's meeting to see if there is interest is
> an alternating meeting time every other week so that we can b
If a mini-summit is held (no matter when), I'll try to make it in person.
Failing that, if a google hangout is set up, I ought to be able to attend
that way.
(And... it's good to be back, eh!)
Stephen
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Edgar Magana wrote:
> That sounds like a good idea Mark!
>
I think we need a timezone to cover the current impossible regions:
- Australia
- China / Japan
- India
Early evening for the UK - the current meeting time - is ok (sure, its
not work hours, but its also not 5am :))
The further west it goes, the better for those regions. I suspect if
we aim i
Hi,
So it turns out that we have made a backwards incompatible change to
the V2 API in Icehouse. Previously when creating a private flavor
access was not automatically given to the tenant, now it is. The
documentation has always said that it was, but we lied.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/408
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Devananda van der Veen <
devananda@gmail.com> wrote:
> Let me start by saying that I want there to be a constructive discussion
> around all this. I've done my best to keep my tone as non-snarky as I could
> while still clearly stating my concerns. I've also s
Proxying from yahoo's open source director (since he wasn't initially
subscribed to this list, afaik he now is) on his behalf.
>From Gil Yehuda (Yahoo’s Open Source director).
I would urge you to avoid creating a dependency between Openstack code and any
AGPL project, including MongoDB. MongoDB
Sure, +1 for both.
--
Kirill Izotov
четверг, 20 марта 2014 г. в 3:52, Dmitri Zimine написал:
> +1 for Nikolay - he's indeed the most involved in all aspect.
> and yes I am up to doing it.
>
> DZ.
>
> On Mar 19, 2014, at 4:35 AM, Renat Akhmerov (mailto:rakhme...@mirantis.com)> wrote:
Excerpts from Joe Gordon's message of 2014-03-18 17:15:59 -0700:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 8:12 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
>
> > On 03/18/2014 10:11 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 07:50:15AM -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> > >> Hi Team,
> > >>
> > >> We have 2 choices
> >
Jorge,
Thanks for taking the time to put up a requirements list. Some comments below:
* Static IP Addresses
* Our current Cloud Load Balancing (CLB) offering utilizes static IP
addresses which is something our customers really like, especially when setting
up DNS. AWS for example, gi
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 12:08:30PM -0400, Zane Bitter wrote:
> On 19/03/14 02:07, Chris Friesen wrote:
> >On 03/18/2014 11:18 AM, Zane Bitter wrote:
> >>On 18/03/14 12:42, Steven Dake wrote:
> >
> >>>You should be able to use the HARestarter resource and functionality to
> >>>do healthchecking of a
On 03/19/2014 08:38 PM, Qiming Teng wrote:
I don't think it a good idea to rely on some external monitoring systems
to do a VM failure detection. It means additional steps to set up,
additional software to upgrade, additional chapter in the Operator's
Guide, etc. We are evaluating whether Ceilo
Ianal, but I know there are some lawyers out there who are concerned that the
mechanism of attachment is vague. If there is an issue (I'm not saying there
is) I don't think mongodb's view is relevant, as they are quite likely to be
bought by someone, say Oracle, who might not share and would not
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 01:04:55PM +, WICKES, ROGER wrote:
> > On 03/18/2014 07:54 AM, Qiming Teng wrote:
> >> Hi, Folks,
> >>
> >>I have been trying to implement a HACluster resource type in Heat. I
> >> haven't created a BluePrint for this because I am not sure everything
> >> will work a
Thanks, guys!
Done.
On 20 Mar 2014, at 02:28, Timur Nurlygayanov wrote:
> Also, in the future, we can join Kirill Izotov to the core team too.
Absolutely, once in a while we’ll be reviewing everyone’s progress and update
the core team.
___
OpenStack
Hi,
Just a reminder that the weekly Nova API meeting is being held tomorrow
Friday UTC .
We encourage cloud operators and those who use the REST API such as
SDK developers and others who and are interested in the future of the
API to participate.
In other timezones the meeting is at:
EST
Hi folks, my comments inlined:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 6:13 AM, Youcef Laribi wrote:
> Jorge,
>
>
>
> Thanks for taking the time to put up a requirements list. Some comments
> below:
>
>- Static IP Addresses
> - Our current Cloud Load Balancing (CLB) offering utilizes static
> I
101 - 118 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
