Hi, all
I find a problem about pci-passthrough.
Test scenario:
1)There are two compute nodes in the environment named A and B. A has two NICs
of vendor_id='8086' and product_id='105e', B has two NICs of vendor_id='8086'
and product_id='10c9'.
2)I configured "pci_alias={"vendor_id":"8086", "prod
Hi all,
I want to know what's the name of IRC channel for novaclient? I want to ask
something about one BP.
And I don't know whether it exists or not, I don't find it in wiki[1].
If you know the information, please tell me. Thanks very much.
Best Wishes,
wingwj
---
[1]. https://wi
Hi, all
I search the current blueprints and old mails in the mail list, but find
nothing about Guest NUMA and setting memory binding policies.
I just find a blueprint about vcpu topology and a blueprint about CPU binding.
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/support-libvirt-vcpu-topology
On 27/02/14 11:52, Petr Blaho wrote:
> I agree with you w/r/t to indirection when accessing data but I like the
> idea that when I look at json repsonse I see what type of resource it
> is. That wrapper element describes it. And I do not need to know what
> request (url, service, GET or POST...) t
Hi -
With resepect to Openstack 3rd Party Ci,
Whenever I run the Jenkins job manually on sandbox, I got these kind of errors
for different runs
For 1st run, I get Keystone based errors
For 2nd run I get mysql root password based errors (the past error goes away)
For 3rd run I get rabbitmq local
Hi,
This is the same channel as nova – that is #openstack-nova
Thanks
Gary
From: wu jiang mailto:win...@gmail.com>>
Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Date: Monday, March 3, 2014 10:11 AM
To: OpenStack Development Ma
Hi everyone!
During investigation of this bug [1] I found weird things in horizon
page layout. And it looks like there are errors deep inside.
First, the* 'div.sidebar'* container has property *'float:left'
*without any width set while all guidelines [2] say that the width
should be set.
Was it
Hi, stackers:
Libvirt/qemu have supported online-extend for multiple disk formats,
including qcow2, sparse, etc. But Cinder only support offline-extend volumes
currently.
Offline-extend volume will force the instance to be shutoff or the volume
to be detached. I think
Hi,
I recently deploy Bare-metal node instance using Heat Template. However, Nova
failed to spawn due to a timeout error. When I look into the code I found that
the timeout is related to Nova downloading disk image from Glance. The
nova-schedule.log shows below:
2014-02-28 02:49:48.046 2136 E
Hi everyone,
Sorry for the late reply, I was on vacation :)
See, inline comments
-Sylvain
- Original Message -
> From: "Assaf Muller"
> 1) Is there a way through the API to know, for a given router, what agent is
> hosting
> the active instance? This might be very important for admins
Greetings,
I wanted to ask if some cores could take a look at these reviews, The code
was pushed since 2 months and didn't get a lot of reviews. All of these
blueprints
are approved for icehouse-3.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/65452/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/65108/
https://review.ope
Hi Gary,
Thanks for your information. I'll consult the BP in there. :)
wingwj
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Gary Kotton wrote:
> Hi,
> This is the same channel as nova - that is #openstack-nova
> Thanks
> Gary
>
> From: wu jiang
> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for us
James Slagle wrote:
> I'd like to ask that the following repositories for TripleO be included
> in next week's cutting of icehouse-3:
>
> http://git.openstack.org/openstack/tripleo-incubator
> http://git.openstack.org/openstack/tripleo-image-elements
> http://git.openstack.org/openstack/tripleo-he
Hello,
It tourns out that this stress test maybe not implemented in the right place.
At ther moment I have put the SSH stress test in large_ops but Joe Gordon
pointed (in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/74067/) that the large_ops gates
are not meant to launch real servers.
So where should I p
Sean Dague wrote:
> On 03/01/2014 06:30 PM, John Griffith wrote:
>> Something that came up recently in the Cinder project is that one of the
>> backend device vendors wasn't happy with a feature that somebody was
>> working on and contributed a patch for. Instead of providing a
>> meaningful revie
1)
I found modules tracked in openstack-common.conf is not consistent with
actual
modules in directoy 'openstack/common' in some projects like Nova. I
drafted a script
to enforce the check in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/76901/. Maybe need
more work
to improve it. Please help review :).
2)
Som
Yes..I will send a mail to Eugene Nikanorov, requesting to add this to the
agenda in the coming weekly discussion.
Detailed requirement is as follows:
In the current implementation, only one LBaaS configuration is possible per
tenant. It is better to have multiple LBaaS configurations for each te
Hi Nikanorov,
Please add the below requirement to the agenda of coming weekly discussion on
Thursday.
Regards,
Srikanth.
From: Srikanth Kumar Lingala [mailto:srikanth.ling...@freescale.com]
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 5:18 PM
To: Stephen Balukoff; Veera Reddy
Cc: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.o
Hi Joe,
Thanks for your reply, I'll try to further explain.
Le 03/03/2014 05:33, Joe Gordon a écrit :
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Dina Belova wrote:
Hello, folks!
I'd like to request Climate project review for incubation. Here is official
incubation application:
https://wiki.openstack
Hello Joe, Thierry, Sylvain.
Joe, I pretty agree with Sylvain in how he had described Climate idea. I
hope it is more understandable now.
Thierry, thanks for answering. I'm sorry I did not send this email before :)
Thanks
Dina
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Sylvain Bauza wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
>
Forgot to put openstack-tc@ in the loop... Sorry for resending this email.
-Sylvain
Le 03/03/2014 13:42, Sylvain Bauza a écrit :
Hi Joe,
Thanks for your reply, I'll try to further explain.
Le 03/03/2014 05:33, Joe Gordon a écrit :
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Dina Belova
wrote:
Hello,
Sylvain Bauza wrote:
> Forgot to put openstack-tc@ in the loop... Sorry for resending this email.
No need to put -tc in the loop: since it's a moderated list it will only
result in extra pain. We'll follow along the discussion on -dev.
Cheers,
--
Thierry Carrez (ttx)
__
Hi Yuhan
I am a bit familiar with this change as we tried it in out POC [1] for IPv6
dual-stack. It achieves a similar function, as best as I understand, by
allowing multiple external bridges (and, therefore, external interfaces).
The feature I am providing here achieves approximately the same thi
I created a new blueprint [1] which is triggered by the requirement to
allow IPv6 Router Advertisement security group rule on compute node in my
on-going code review [2].
Currently, only security group rule direction, protocol, ethertype and port
range are supported by neutron security group rule
Maybe I am misunderstanding the debate, but imho Every OpenStack Service (XaaS)
needs to be listed in the Service Catalog as being available (and stable and
tested), and every instance of that service, when started, needs a service ID,
and every X created by that service needs a UUID aka object
Hi guys,
By checking the status of the patch at [1] by arezmerita, I noticed that it
didn’t get any reviews since the last upload on Jan 31th (after a comprehensive
round of reviews started on Dec 10th).
During a chat on #openstack-horizon, jpich noticed that the BP [2] was not
targetted, so i
- Original Message -
> Hi Steve,
>
> On Sat, 1 Mar 2014 16:14:19 -0500 (EST)
> Steve Gordon wrote:
[SNIP]
> > My feeling both with my product hat and my upstream documentation
> > contributor hat on knowing some of the issues we've had there in the
> > past is that one release cycle of
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 4:42 AM, Sylvain Bauza wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> Thanks for your reply, I'll try to further explain.
>
>
> Le 03/03/2014 05:33, Joe Gordon a écrit :
>
>> On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Dina Belova wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello, folks!
>>>
>>> I'd like to request Climate project review
Liuji (Jeremy) said on Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 08:06:57AM +:
> Test scenario:
> 1)There are two compute nodes in the environment named A and B. A has two
> NICs of vendor_id='8086' and product_id='105e', B has two NICs of
> vendor_id='8086' and product_id='10c9'.
> 2)I configured "pci_alias={"ve
I'm please to announce that OpenStack Swift 1.13 has been released.
This release has some important new features (highlighted below), and
it also serves as a good checkpoint before Swift's final release in
the Icehouse cycle.
Launchpad page for this release: https://launchpad.net/swift/icehouse/1.
On 03/01/14 at 07:24am, Jay Lau wrote:
Hey,
Sorry to bring this up again. There are also some discussions here:
http://markmail.org/message/5zotly4qktaf34ei
You can also search [Runtime Policy] in your email list.
Not sure if we can put this to Gantt and enable Gantt provide both initial
place
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 8:20 AM, Joe Gordon wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 4:42 AM, Sylvain Bauza
> wrote:
> > Hi Joe,
> >
> > Thanks for your reply, I'll try to further explain.
> >
> >
> > Le 03/03/2014 05:33, Joe Gordon a écrit :
> >
> >> On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Dina Belova
> wrote:
On Sun, 2014-03-02 at 12:05 -0800, Morgan Fainberg wrote:
> Having done some work with MySQL (specifically around similar data
> sets) and discussing the changes with some former coworkers (MySQL
> experts) I am inclined to believe the move from varchar to binary
> absolutely would increase perfor
On 03/03/2014 01:14 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 03/03/2014 11:24 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> It looks like my patch fixes the first unit test failure. Though we
>> still need a fix for the 2nd problem:
>> AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'AbstractType'
>
> Replying to myself...
PEP 8, under 'Programming Recommendations' recommends against implicit
comparison to None. This isn't just stylistic, either: we were actually
bitten by it in the VMware driver
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1262288). The bug was hard to
spot, and had consequences to resource usage.
However
On 03/02/2014 02:32 PM, Dina Belova wrote:
> Hello, folks!
>
> I'd like to request Climate project review for incubation. Here is
> official incubation application:
>
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Climate/Incubation
>
> Additionally due to the project scope and the roadmap, we don't see any
there are a lot of rules for HA or LB, so I think it might be a better idea
to scope the framework and leave the policy as plugins.
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 10:30 PM, Andrew Laski wrote:
> On 03/01/14 at 07:24am, Jay Lau wrote:
>
>> Hey,
>>
>> Sorry to bring this up again. There are also some disc
On 03/02/2014 03:12 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 03/02/2014 12:03 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
I hope to get support from core reviewers here, so that we can fix-up
the SQLA 0.9.x compat ASAP, preferably before b3. Of course, I'll make
sure all we do works with both 0.8 and 0.9 version of SQLA. I
On 2014-02-28 20:26, jackychen wrote:
> hi,
> I have commit a patch to sync notifier module under horizon with
> oslo-incubator, I met the gate-horizon-python error, all the errors are aimed
> at DatabseError.
> Code Review Link: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/76439/ [1]
>
> The specific
On 03/03/2014 08:14 AM, Steve Gordon wrote:
I would be interested in your opinion on the impact of a V2
version release which had backwards incompatibility in only one
area - and that is input validation. So only apps/SDKs which are
currently misusing the API (I think the most common problem wou
Yes, it would be great if we can have a simple framework for future run
time policy plugins. ;-)
2014-03-03 23:12 GMT+08:00 laserjetyang :
> there are a lot of rules for HA or LB, so I think it might be a better
> idea to scope the framework and leave the policy as plugins.
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2
On 03/03/14 at 03:00pm, Matthew Booth wrote:
PEP 8, under 'Programming Recommendations' recommends against implicit
comparison to None. This isn't just stylistic, either: we were actually
bitten by it in the VMware driver
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1262288). The bug was hard to
spot, a
> Capacity planning not falling under Compute's umbrella is news to me,
> are you referring to Gantt and scheduling in general? Perhaps I don't
> fully understand the full extent of what 'capacity planning' actually
> is.
We intend that 'capacity' means not only 'compute capacity', but any kind
On Sat, 2014-03-01 at 16:30 -0700, John Griffith wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I just wanted to send out a quick note on a topic that came up
> recently. Unfortunately the folks that I'd like to read this most;
> don't participate on the ML typically, but I'd at least like to raise
> some community awareness
Hi all,
Just a friendly reminder we will have a workshop and Q&A meeting on
Freeonde #openstack-meeting channel today at 18:00 UTC (13:00 EST) for
folks interested in setting up or debugging third party CI platforms.
See you there!
Best,
-jay
___
Ope
+1
Sent with AquaMail for Android
http://www.aqua-mail.com
On March 3, 2014 10:12:43 AM Jay Pipes wrote:
On Sat, 2014-03-01 at 16:30 -0700, John Griffith wrote:
> Hey,
> I just wanted to send out a quick note on a topic that came up
> recently. Unfortunately the folks that I'd like to read
Hello, Sean
I think your idea is really interesting. I mean, that thought "Gantt -
where to schedule, Climate - when to schedule" is quite understandable and
good looking.
These two 'directions' of scheduling process really look like fitting into
one Program - probably it should be named "Resourc
On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 09:39:42PM +0800, Xuhan Peng wrote:
> Currently, only security group rule direction, protocol, ethertype and port
> range are supported by neutron security group rule data structure. To allow
If I am not mistaken, I believe that when you use the ICMP protocol
type, you can
On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 10:51:59AM +0800, Xuhan Peng wrote:
> Abishek,
>
> The two attributes are editable if you look at Sean's patch
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/52983/27/neutron/api/v2/attributes.py. The
> "allow_put" is set to be "True" for these two attributes.
>
> Xuhan
+1 - the attr
Hi Jay-
Thank you for the reminder.
Waiting to meet you at the IRC webchat.
--
Trinath Somanchi - B39208
trinath.soman...@freescale.com | extn: 4048
-Original Message-
From: Jay Pipes [mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 9:47 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing L
Xuhan,
Currently, ICMP type and code are represented via port_range_min and
port_range_max when icmp protocol is specified. See
https://github.com/openstack/neutron/blob/master/neutron/db/securitygroups_db.py#L309
(Just the state of things, I’m not commenting on how bad it is).
I would also li
Thanks for joining us today #openstack-meeting for our weekly community meeting.
As always, meeting minutes and log:
Minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/mistral/2014/mistral.2014-03-03-16.00.html
Log:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/mistral/2014/mistral.2014-03-03-16.00.log
Hi, team!
Please look at the commit .
Module 'mistral/model' now is responsible for object model representation
which is used for accessing properties of actions, tasks etc.
We have a name problem - looks like we should rename module 'mistral/model'
since we have DB models and they are absolutel
Hi Sean,
2014-03-03 16:04 GMT+01:00 Sean Dague :
>
>
> At a high level this feels like this should be part of scheduling.
> Scheduling might include resources you want right now, but it could
> include resources you want in the future. It also makes sense for
> scheduling to include deadlines,
Hi everyone,
The OpenStack Infrastructure (Infra) team is hosting our weekly
meeting tomorrow, Tuesday March 4th, at 19:00 UTC in
#openstack-meeting
Meeting agenda available here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/InfraTeamMeeting (anyone is
welcome to to add agenda items)
Everyone intere
On 03/03/2014 10:00 AM, Matthew Booth wrote:
> PEP 8, under 'Programming Recommendations' recommends against implicit
> comparison to None. This isn't just stylistic, either: we were actually
> bitten by it in the VMware driver
> (https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1262288). The bug was hard to
>
On 3 March 2014 11:27, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> It will certainly hurt the first one we nail on the wall. So here is one
> reputational pressure: you don't want to be that company.
>
> [1] http://fnords.wordpress.com/2014/02/24/the-dilemma-of-open-innovation/
-1.
That's a really harsh threat be
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 2:01 AM, Zhangleiqiang wrote:
> Hi, stackers:
>
> Libvirt/qemu have supported online-extend for multiple disk
> formats, including qcow2, sparse, etc. But Cinder only support
> offline-extend volumes currently.
>
> Offline-extend volume will force the instance to
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 6:27 AM, Anne Gentle wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 8:20 AM, Joe Gordon wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 4:42 AM, Sylvain Bauza
>> wrote:
>> > Hi Joe,
>> >
>> > Thanks for your reply, I'll try to further explain.
>> >
>> >
>> > Le 03/03/2014 05:33, Joe Gordon a écr
Joe, as said, Amazon reservation is not like implemented in Climate - and
really we had different original use cases to have the same result. Amazon
instances reservations do not guarantee that instance will be provided to
user, as in Climate we started implemented reservations possibilities with
t
Luke Gorrie wrote:
> That's a really harsh threat being made against a really vaguely defined
> group.
>
> I don't want to have to read between the lines on threats posted to
> openstack-dev to see if my reputation will be in tatters in the morning.
>
> This spoiled my day today, and I have nothi
There has been quite a bit of discussion about the future of the v3 API
recently. There has been growing support for the idea that we should
change course and focus on evolving the existing v2 API instead of
putting out a new major revision. This message is a more complete
presentation of that pr
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 8:00 AM, Dina Belova wrote:
>> Capacity planning not falling under Compute's umbrella is news to me,
>
>> are you referring to Gantt and scheduling in general? Perhaps I don't
>
>> fully understand the full extent of what 'capacity planning' actually
>
>> is.
>
>
> We intend
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 8:48 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-03-02 at 12:05 -0800, Morgan Fainberg wrote:
> > Having done some work with MySQL (specifically around similar data
> > sets) and discussing the changes with some former coworkers (MySQL
> > experts) I am inclined to believe the move
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Dina Belova wrote:
> Joe, as said, Amazon reservation is not like implemented in Climate - and
> really we had different original use cases to have the same result. Amazon
> instances reservations do not guarantee that instance will be provided to
> user, as in Clim
On 03/03/14 12:32, Joe Gordon wrote:
>- if you're reserving resources far before you'll need them, it'll be
>cheaper
Why? How does this save a provider money?
If an operator has zero information about the level of future demand,
they will have to spend a *lot* of money on excess capacity or r
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Luke Gorrie wrote:
> > That's a really harsh threat being made against a really vaguely defined
> > group.
> >
> > I don't want to have to read between the lines on threats posted to
> > openstack-dev to see if my reputation will be in tatte
I updated https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/TripleO and the link at the
All TripleO Reviews at the bottom to include it.
On 03/02/2014 12:07 AM, Robert Collins wrote:
This is a new repository to provide common code for tuskar and the
seed initialisation logic - the post heat completion initial
co
Hi Joe,
2014-03-03 18:32 GMT+01:00 Joe Gordon :
>
>
> This sounds like something that belongs in nova, Phil Day has an
> elegant solution for this:
> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/whole-host-allocation
>
>
This blueprint has already been addressed by Climate team, and we discussed
Hi folks, I’d like to propose adding Fei Long Wang (flwang) as a core reviewer
on the Marconi team. He has been contributing regularly over the past couple of
months, and has proven to be a careful reviewer with good judgment.
All Marconi ATC’s, please respond with a +1 or –1.
Cheers,
Kurt G. |
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
> There has been quite a bit of discussion about the future of the v3 API
> recently. There has been growing support for the idea that we should
> change course and focus on evolving the existing v2 API instead of
> putting out a new major rev
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Zane Bitter wrote:
> On 03/03/14 12:32, Joe Gordon wrote:
>>>
>>> >- if you're reserving resources far before you'll need them, it'll be
>>> >cheaper
>>
>> Why? How does this save a provider money?
>
>
> If an operator has zero information about the level of future
Oh, Sylvain, you were first :)
I have just small things to add here: Joe, resource usage planning is great
feature, that, I believe, is not supported in OS services now. Resource
planning will allow cloud providers to react on future picks of loads,
because they *will know* about that. As Zane sai
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Kurt Griffiths
wrote:
Hi folks, I’d like to propose adding Fei Long Wang (flwang) as a
core reviewer on the Marconi team. He has been contributing regularly
over the past couple of months, and has proven to be a careful
reviewer with good judgment.
All Marcon
On 03/03/2014 01:35 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Zane Bitter wrote:
>> On 03/03/14 12:32, Joe Gordon wrote:
> - if you're reserving resources far before you'll need them, it'll be
> cheaper
>>>
>>> Why? How does this save a provider money?
>>
>>
>> If an op
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Sylvain Bauza wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
>
> 2014-03-03 18:32 GMT+01:00 Joe Gordon :
>
>>
>>
>> This sounds like something that belongs in nova, Phil Day has an
>> elegant solution for this:
>> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/whole-host-allocation
>>
>
> This b
+1
From: Cindy Pallares
mailto:cindy.pallar...@gmail.com>>
Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Date: Monday, March 3, 2014 1:41 PM
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
mailto:openstack-
On 03/03/2014 01:27 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
>> 1) What about tasks?
>>
>> In some cases, the proposed integration of tasks is backwards
>> compatible. A task ID will be added to a header. The biggest point of
>> debate was if and how we would
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Dina Belova wrote:
> Oh, Sylvain, you were first :)
>
> I have just small things to add here: Joe, resource usage planning is great
> feature, that, I believe, is not supported in OS services now. Resource
> planning will allow cloud providers to react on future pi
On 03/03/14 at 10:27am, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
There has been quite a bit of discussion about the future of the v3 API
recently. There has been growing support for the idea that we should
change course and focus on evolving the existing v2 API i
Guido kindly updated PEP-257 for us[1]. So now the hacking guide content
accurately matches PEP-257 (no extra line required at the end of a multi-line
docstring).
This alone should resolve the patch and comments that initiated this discussion.
With regards to automating the checks and gates, we
Hi all,
This is just one another example of MySQL not having production ready
defaults. The original idea was to force setting the SQL mode to
TRADITIONAL in code in projects using oslo.db code when "they are ready"
(unit and functional tests pass). So the warning was actually for
developers rathe
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Joe Gordon wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 6:27 AM, Anne Gentle wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 8:20 AM, Joe Gordon
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 4:42 AM, Sylvain Bauza
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi Joe,
> >> >
> >> > Thanks for your reply, I'll t
On 3 March 2014 23:12, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> James Slagle wrote:
>> I'd like to ask that the following repositories for TripleO be included
>> in next week's cutting of icehouse-3:
>>
>> http://git.openstack.org/openstack/tripleo-incubator
>> http://git.openstack.org/openstack/tripleo-image-elem
On Mar 3, 2014, at 6:48 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-03-02 at 12:05 -0800, Morgan Fainberg wrote:
>> Having done some work with MySQL (specifically around similar data
>> sets) and discussing the changes with some former coworkers (MySQL
>> experts) I am inclined to believe the move from
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 03/03/2014 01:35 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Zane Bitter wrote:
>>> On 03/03/14 12:32, Joe Gordon wrote:
>
>> - if you're reserving resources far before you'll need them, it'll be
>> cheaper
>>>
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-02-28 at 15:25 -0800, Mark Washenberger wrote:
> > I believe we have some agreement here. Other openstack services should
> > be able to use a strongly typed identifier for users. I just think if
> > we want to go that route, we pro
Thanks Khanh,
I see the potential issue with using threads. Thanks for pointing out. On using
containers, that sounds like a cool configuration but that should have a bigger
footprint on the host resources than just a separate service instance like I'm
doing. I have to admit that 100 fake compu
So that definitely got lost in translation somewhere, and is about to
have us spam icehouse users with messages that make them think their
openstack cluster is going to burn to the ground. Is there proposed
reviews to set those defaults in projects up already?
Remember - WARN is a level seen by ad
On Mon, 2014-03-03 at 11:09 -0800, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
> On Mar 3, 2014, at 6:48 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2014-03-02 at 12:05 -0800, Morgan Fainberg wrote:
> >> Having done some work with MySQL (specifically around similar data
> >> sets) and discussing the changes with some forme
Thanks John,
What I'm trying to do is to run an asynchronous task that pre-organizes the
target hosts for an image. Then scheduler only need to read the top of the list
or priority queue. We have a paper proposed for the summit that will explain
the approach, hopefully it gets accepted so we ca
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
> On 03/03/2014 01:27 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
>>> 1) What about tasks?
>>>
>>> In some cases, the proposed integration of tasks is backwards
>>> compatible. A task ID will be added to a
On Mon, 2014-03-03 at 11:18 -0800, Mark Washenberger wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-02-28 at 15:25 -0800, Mark Washenberger wrote:
> > I believe we have some agreement here. Other openstack
> services should
> > be
Reminder that tomorrow we're back on the meeting schedule after having
last week off. Extra special note that the meeting is moved up a day
to Tuesday instead of being on a Wednesday last time.
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings#python-openstacksdk_Meeting
Date/Time: Tuesday 4 March - 19:00
-1 from me. Sounds like a way to avoid badly needed change and
innovation in the API. When, for example, would we be able to propose a
patch that removed API extensions entirely?
The inconsistent naming, capitalization, numerous worthless or pointless
API extensions, ability to do similar or ident
On Mon, 2014-03-03 at 14:25 -0500, Sean Dague wrote:
> So that definitely got lost in translation somewhere, and is about to
> have us spam icehouse users with messages that make them think their
> openstack cluster is going to burn to the ground. Is there proposed
> reviews to set those defaults i
Hi all,
I'm working on a bug to fix the documentation for POST /servers.
Apparently, you can attach one or more networks to a server when you initially
boot it, but the "networks" element and associated attributes are not
documented here: http://api.openstack.org/api-ref-compute.html
Anyway, I
On 03/02/2014 09:42 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
Coming in at slightly less than 1 million log lines in the last 7 days:
http://logstash.openstack.org/#eyJzZWFyY2giOiJtZXNzYWdlOlwiVGhpcyBhcHBsaWNhdGlvbiBoYXMgbm90IGVuYWJsZWQgTXlTUUwgdHJhZGl0aW9uYWwgbW9kZSwgd2hpY2ggbWVhbnMgc2lsZW50IGRhdGEgY29ycnVwdGlvbiBt
On Mon, 2014-03-03 at 16:53 +, trinath.soman...@freescale.com wrote:
> Hi Jay-
>
> I have the following doubts with my CI setup.
>
> Hope presenting them before the meeting might help me with some more
> guidance.
>
> [1] sandbox-dvsm-tempest-full runs all the test cases where few fail, ca
David Peraza писал(а) в своём письме Mon,
03 Mar 2014 21:27:01 +0200:
Using compute inside LXC, I created 100 computes per physical host. Here
is what I did, it's very simple:
- Creating a LXC with logical volume
- Installing a fake nova-compute inside the LXC
- Make a booting scrip
1 - 100 of 174 matches
Mail list logo
