Re: [openstack-dev] What's Up Doc? Nov 20 2013

On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 7:54 AM, Anne Gentle wrote: > 5. Doc tools updates: > > David Cramer tells me he'll cut one more release of the clouddocs-tools > maven plugin then it'll be put into Gerrit workflow in the OpenStack > organization. Thanks to David and Zaro for the hard work here over many

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic][Ceilometer] get IPMI data for ceilometer

Responses inline. On 11/20/2013 07:14 PM, Devananda van der Veen wrote: Responses inline. On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 2:19 AM, Ladislav Smola > wrote: Ok, I'll try to summarize what will be done in the near future for Undercloud monitoring. 1. There will be

Re: [openstack-dev] Propose "project story wiki" idea

Clint, The main idea is to have processed by human history of project. It is really impossible to aggregate automatically all data from different sources: IRC (main project chat/dev chat/meetings), Mailing Lists, Code, Reviews, Summit discussions, using project specific knowledge and history of

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] Javascript development improvement

Hello, as long as node won't be Production dependency, it shouldn't be a problem, right? I give +1 to that Regards Ladislav On 11/20/2013 05:01 PM, Maxime Vidori wrote: Hi all, I know it is pretty annoying but I have to resurrect this subject. With the integration of Angularjs into Horizon

Re: [openstack-dev] [Climate] How we agree to determine that an user has admin rights ?

Hi Yuriy, Dolph et al. I'm implementing a climate.policy.check_is_admin(ctx) which will look at policy.json entry 'context_is_admin' for knowing which roles do have elevated rights for Climate. This check must be called when creating a context for knowing if we can allow extra rights. The is

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Does Nova really need an SQL database?

2013/11/20 Chris Friesen : > What about a hybrid solution? > There is data that is only used by the scheduler--for performance reasons > maybe it would make sense to store that information in RAM as described at > > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/no-db-scheduler > > For the rest of the

Re: [openstack-dev] How to best make User Experience a priority in every project

On 20/11/13 09:37 -0600, Dolph Mathews wrote: On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Hi everyone, How should we proceed to make sure UX (user experience) is properly taken into account into OpenStack development ? Historically it was hard for UX sessions (especia

Re: [openstack-dev] [Climate] How we agree to determine that an user has admin rights ?

On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Sylvain Bauza wrote: > Hi Yuriy, Dolph et al. > > I'm implementing a climate.policy.check_is_admin(ctx) which will look at > policy.json entry 'context_is_admin' for knowing which roles do have > elevated rights for Climate. > > This check must be called when cre

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Find the compute host on which a VM runs

Hello again, I studied the portbindings extension (the quantum.db.portbindings_db and quantum.extensions.portbindings modules). However it's unclear for me who sets the portbindings.HOST_ID attribute. I ran some tests with OVS: called quantum port-create command and the OVSQuantumPluginV2.create_p

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Static IPAddress configuration in nova.conf file

Hi, Please let us know if anybody is having similar requirement as below. Also any suggestions/comments on this approach will be helpful. Regards, Balaji.P From: P Balaji-B37839 Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 4:09 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List Cc: Mannidi Purandhar Sairam-B39209; Ling

Re: [openstack-dev] Propose "project story wiki" idea

Excerpts from Boris Pavlovic's message of 2013-11-21 00:16:04 -0800: > Clint, > > The main idea is to have processed by human history of project. > > It is really impossible to aggregate automatically all data from different > sources: > IRC (main project chat/dev chat/meetings), Mailing Lists, C

Re: [openstack-dev] [Climate] How we agree to determine that an user has admin rights ?

Le 21/11/2013 10:04, Yuriy Taraday a écrit : On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Sylvain Bauza mailto:sylvain.ba...@bull.net>> wrote: Hi Yuriy, Dolph et al. I'm implementing a climate.policy.check_is_admin(ctx) which will look at policy.json entry 'context_is_admin' for knowing which

Re: [openstack-dev] Propose "project story wiki" idea

Stefano Maffulli wrote: > On 11/19/2013 09:33 PM, Boris Pavlovic wrote: >> The idea of this proposal is that every OpenStack project should have >> "story" wiki page. It means to publish every week one short message that >> contains most interesting updates for the last week, and high level road >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] meaning of resource_id in a meter

On Wed, Nov 20 2013, Gordon Chung wrote: > came across a question when reviewing > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/56019... basically, in Samples, user_id > and project_id attributes are pretty self-explanatory and map to Keystone > concepts pretty well but what is the criteria for setting res

Re: [openstack-dev] How to stage client major releases in Gerrit?

Mark Washenberger wrote: > [...] > In order to mitigate that risk, I think it would make a lot of sense to > have a place to stage and carefully consider all the breaking changes we > want to make. I also would like to have that place be somewhere in > Gerrit so that it fits in with our current sub

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Race condition between DB layer and plugin back-end implementation

On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:16:46PM -0800, Gary Duan wrote: > Hi, Isaku and Edgar, Hi. > As part of the effort to implement L3 router service type framework, I have > reworked L3 plugin to introduce a 2-step process, precommit and postcommit, > similar to ML2. If you plan to work on L3 code, we

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Scalable HAProxy Resources

Hi, Yes, it's briefly covered here: http://docs.openstack.org/network-admin/admin/content/install_neutron-lbaas-agent.html So basically you install lbaas agents on network controllers or compute nodes (not VMs!). Upon startup those agents register themselves in neutron and become available for han

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Subteam meeting on Thursday, 21

Meeting reminder! Today, 14-00 UTC, #openstack-meeting Agenda for the meeting: 1) Announcements 2) Progress with qa and third-party testing 3) Feature design discussions Thanks, Eugene. On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Eugene Nikanorov wrote: > Hi folks, > > Let's meet on #openstack-meeting o

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] rough draft of Heat autoscaling API

On 20/11/13 23:49, Christopher Armstrong wrote: On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Zane Bitter mailto:zbit...@redhat.com>> wrote: On 20/11/13 16:07, Christopher Armstrong wrote: On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Zane Bitter mailto:zbit...@redhat.com>

[openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Extended query filtering feature

Hi All, As a resumption of the Improving Ceilometer API query filtering session of the HK Design Summit, I created a document about supporting complex query filters in Ceilometer. The document contains a brief summary of the previously suggested idea. The second part of the etherpad discuss the

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [heat] Custom Flavor creation through Heat

>-Original Message- >From: ext Steven Hardy [mailto:sha...@redhat.com] >Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 2:33 PM >To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [heat] Custom Flavor creation through Heat >

Re: [openstack-dev] Introducing the new OpenStack service for Containers

Hi Has a decision happened when this meeting is going to take place, assuming it is still taking place tomorrow. Regards chuck On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 7:58 PM, Krishna Raman wrote: > > On Nov 18, 2013, at 4:30 PM, Russell Bryant wrote: > > On 11/18/2013 06:30 PM, Dan Smith wrote: > > Not hav

[openstack-dev] [Nova][Schduler] Volunteers wanted for a modest proposal for an external scheduler in our lifetime

https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/icehouse-external-scheduler I'm looking for 4-5 folk who have: - modest Nova skills - time to follow a fairly mechanical (but careful and detailed work needed) plan to break the status quo around scheduler extraction And of course, discussion galore about the id

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Does cinder support HDS AMS 2300 storage now?

On Thu Nov 21 03:32:10 UTC 2013, Lei asked: I just found the HUS is supported. But I have a old AMS storage machine and want to use it. So I want to make sure is it possible? The answer is that both AMS and HUS arrays are supported. Steve Sonnenberg Master Solutions Consultant Hitachi Data System

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Race condition between DB layer and plugin back-end implementation

See inline, On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 2:19 AM, Isaku Yamahata wrote: > On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:16:46PM -0800, > Gary Duan wrote: > > > Hi, Isaku and Edgar, > > Hi. > > > > As part of the effort to implement L3 router service type framework, I > have > > reworked L3 plugin to introduce a 2-step

Re: [openstack-dev] The recent gate performance and how it affects you

On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Michael Still wrote: > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Clark Boylan wrote: > >> How do we avoid this in the future? Step one is reviewers that are >> approving changes (or reverifying them) should keep an eye on the gate >> queue. > > Talking on the -infra IRC ch

Re: [openstack-dev] [Diagnostic] Diagnostic API: summit follow-up

On 11/20/2013 9:35 PM, Lingxian Kong wrote: hi Matt: noticed there is no consensus there[1], any progress outside the ML? [1] http://lists.openstack.org/__pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-__October/016385.html 2013/1

Re: [openstack-dev] How to stage client major releases in Gerrit?

On 22 November 2013 02:57, Monty Taylor wrote: > > > > This is a really complex one because of the gate. It's not just about > the semver major version bump. I agree with earlier sentiment - the way > to handle breaking changes is to bump the major version, and on the > surface I don't have a pro

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Oslo] Future of Key Distribution Server, Trusted Messaging

On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Jarret Raim wrote: > The Barbican team has been taking a look at the KDS feature and the > proposed patch and I think this may be better placed in Barbican rather > than Keystone. The patch, from what I can tell, seems to require that a > service account create & u

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] Proposals for Tempest core

+1 for both! - Original Message - > From: "Sean Dague" > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > > Sent: Friday, November 15, 2013 2:38:27 PM > Subject: [openstack-dev] [qa] Proposals for Tempest core > > It's post summit time, so time to evaluate our cur

Re: [openstack-dev] Search Project - summit follow up

> On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 3:12 PM > Dolph Mathews wrote: >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Dmitri Zimin(e) | StackStorm >> wrote: >> Thanks Terry for highlighting this: >> >> Yes, tenant isolation is the must. It's not reflected in the prototype - it >> queries Solr directly;

Re: [openstack-dev] How to best make User Experience a priority in every project

On 2013-11-21 10:20, Jesse Noller wrote: On Nov 20, 2013, at 9:09 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Hi everyone, How should we proceed to make sure UX (user experience) is properly taken into account into OpenStack development ? Historically it was hard for UX sessions (especially the ones that aff

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic][Ceilometer] get IPMI data for ceilometer

On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 12:08 AM, Ladislav Smola wrote: > Responses inline. > > > On 11/20/2013 07:14 PM, Devananda van der Veen wrote: > > Responses inline. > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 2:19 AM, Ladislav Smola wrote: > >> Ok, I'll try to summarize what will be done in the near future for >> Und

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Meeting logs from the first IRC meeting

Meeting minutes and the logs for the Neutron IPv6 meeting has been posted. We will not meet next week, due to the Thanksgiving holiday in the US. Our next meeting will be Thursday Dec 5th - 2100 UTC, where we will review the goals from this week's meeting and look to create actionable items for I

[openstack-dev] [ALL] Wheel-enabling patches

Greetings, There are some patches that add support for building wheels. The patch adds a `[wheel]` section with `universal = True` `universal=True` means the applications supports py2/py3 which is not the case for most (all?) openstack projects. So, please, do not approve those patches. Glance

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][QA] Update on Neutron's tempest efforts

As it's been over two weeks since the issue was discussed at the summit, I've tried to summarize the current status in the summit session's etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/icehouse-summit-qa-neutron Please feel free to update the etherpad if you feel something is incorrect, or I forgot

Re: [openstack-dev] Introducing the new OpenStack service for Containers

On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Sam Alba wrote: > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Krishna Raman wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Sam Alba wrote: > >> > >> I wish we can make a decision during this meeting. Is it confirmed for > >> Friday 9am pacific? > > > > > > Friday 9am Pac

[openstack-dev] [neutron] Group-based Policy language

At the Neutron group-based policy proposal meeting today, we discussed whether or not the proposal should include a concrete policy language. We decided to send a note to the list to get additional feedback. The proposed API extension includes the ability to insert/delete policy statements. B

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] The three API server multi-worker process patches.

Hello, Please tell me if your experience is similar to what I experienced: 1. I would see *at most one* "MySQL server has gone away" error for each process that was spawned as an API worker. I saw them within a minute of spawning the workers and then I did not see these errors anymore until I r

Re: [openstack-dev] Propose "project story wiki" idea

On 11/21/2013 4:43 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: The trick is, such coverage requires editors with a deep technical knowledge, both to be able to determine significant news from marketing noise *and* to be able to deep dive into a new feature and make an article out of it that makes a good read for

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack][qa][Tempest][Network] Test for external connectivity

On 2013-11-21 13:59:16 +0100 (+0100), Salvatore Orlando wrote: [...] > In its default configuration the traffic from the OS instance is > SNATed and the SRC IP will be rewritten to an address in the > neutron's public network range (172.24.4.224/28 by default). If > the OS instance is trying to rea

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Oslo] Future of Key Distribution Server, Trusted Messaging

On 11/21/2013 01:55 AM, Russell Bryant wrote: Greetings, I'd like to check in on the status of this API addition: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/40692/ The last comment is: "propose against stackforge as discussed at summit?" Yes, it was discussed in a small group, and not offici

Re: [openstack-dev] How to best make User Experience a priority in every project

I think Jesse illustrates *why* we need a program for UX. SW Developers don't think the same way as UX developers. UX is working on stuff most of us have never considered across all sorts of project lines. A warm, understanding home to brainstorm issues before returning to the project trenche

Re: [openstack-dev] Introducing myself - looking for a IPv6 topology

Cool! Thank you Kyle! I'll try to join the today's IPv6 meeting... Cheers! Thiago On 20 November 2013 01:08, Kyle Mestery (kmestery) wrote: > On Nov 19, 2013, at 7:23 PM, Martinx - ジェームズ > wrote: > > > > One more thing... > > > > I'm thinking about the "use case" for "Floating IPs" in a NAT-l

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder][Glance] OSLO update

On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 9:12 PM, John Griffith wrote: > On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Mark McLoughlin > wrote: > > On Mon, 2013-11-18 at 17:24 +, Duncan Thomas wrote: > >> Random OSLO updates with no list of what changed, what got fixed etc > >> are unlikely to get review attention - doing

Re: [openstack-dev] How to stage client major releases in Gerrit?

On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 1:58 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Mark Washenberger wrote: > > [...] > > In order to mitigate that risk, I think it would make a lot of sense to > > have a place to stage and carefully consider all the breaking changes we > > want to make. I also would like to have that plac

Re: [openstack-dev] Introducing the new OpenStack service for Containers

On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Krishna Raman wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Sam Alba wrote: >> >> I wish we can make a decision during this meeting. Is it confirmed for >> Friday 9am pacific? > > > Friday 9am Pacific seems to be the best time for this meeting. Can we use > the #ope

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT software configuration refined after design summit discussions

On 11/21/2013 08:48 PM, Thomas Spatzier wrote: > Excerpts from Steve Baker's message on 21.11.2013 00:00:47: >> From: Steve Baker >> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, >> Date: 21.11.2013 00:04 >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT software configuration >> refined after design summit dis

Re: [openstack-dev] Top Gate Bugs

Hi Clark, 2013/11/21 Clark Boylan : > > Joe seemed to be on the same track with > https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/tempest+branch:master+topic:57578,n,z > but went far enough to revert the change that introduced that test. A > couple people were going to keep hitting

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] rough draft of Heat autoscaling API

There is a high priority approved blueprint for a Neutron PoolMember: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/loadballancer-pool-members Thanks, Kevin From: Christopher Armstrong [chris.armstr...@rackspace.com] Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2013 9:44 AM

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] Proposals for Tempest core

With all tempest-core votes in, it's unanimous. Masayuki and Ken'ichi, welcome to the team! -Sean On 11/21/2013 09:55 AM, Attila Fazekas wrote: > +1 for both! > > > > - Original Message - >> From: "Sean Dague" >> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] rough draft of Heat autoscaling API

On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 5:18 AM, Zane Bitter wrote: > On 20/11/13 23:49, Christopher Armstrong wrote: > >> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Zane Bitter > > wrote: >> >> On 20/11/13 16:07, Christopher Armstrong wrote: >> >> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Za

Re: [openstack-dev] Propose "project story wiki" idea

On Thu, 2013-11-21 at 10:43 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Stefano Maffulli wrote: > > On 11/19/2013 09:33 PM, Boris Pavlovic wrote: > >> The idea of this proposal is that every OpenStack project should have > >> "story" wiki page. It means to publish every week one short message that > >> contains

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Does Nova really need an SQL database?

On 11/21/2013 10:52 AM, Stephen Gran wrote: On 21/11/13 15:49, Chris Friesen wrote: On 11/21/2013 02:58 AM, Soren Hansen wrote: 2013/11/20 Chris Friesen : What about a hybrid solution? There is data that is only used by the scheduler--for performance reasons maybe it would make sense to store

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] L7 Switching

Hi, The CLI example is capturing the requirement concisely. Thanks. One suggestion, you could bring the "--policy policy1" to the beginning of create-lb-l7rule command. Also, could rename associate-lb-pool-vip to associate-lb-vip-pool It will be best to define the db model to reflect the cli.

Re: [openstack-dev] Introducing the new OpenStack service for Containers

++ on Fri. 9am PST. On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Sam Alba wrote: > I wish we can make a decision during this meeting. Is it confirmed for > Friday 9am pacific? > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 8:24 AM, Chuck Short > wrote: > > Hi > > > > Has a decision happened when this meeting is going to ta

Re: [openstack-dev] How to stage client major releases in Gerrit?

On 11/21/2013 01:58 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Mark Washenberger wrote: >> [...] >> In order to mitigate that risk, I think it would make a lot of sense to >> have a place to stage and carefully consider all the breaking changes we >> want to make. I also would like to have that place be somewhe

Re: [openstack-dev] Introducing the new OpenStack service for Containers

On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Sam Alba wrote: > I wish we can make a decision during this meeting. Is it confirmed for > Friday 9am pacific? > Friday 9am Pacific seems to be the best time for this meeting. Can we use the #openstack-meeting channel for this? If not, then I can find another cha

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] rough draft of Heat autoscaling API

On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Zane Bitter wrote: > On 20/11/13 23:49, Christopher Armstrong wrote: >> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Heat/AutoScaling#LBMember.3F >> >> Basically, the LoadBalancerMember resource (which is very similar to the >> CinderVolumeAttachment) would be responsible for

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack][nova][social-apects] Social aspects shouldn't impact on dev process

On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 6:29 AM, David Ripton wrote: > On 11/20/2013 02:06 AM, Boris Pavlovic wrote: > > I faced some social problems in community. >> >> We started working on purge engine for DB (before HK summit) >> >> This is very important, because at this moment we don't have any working >>

[openstack-dev] Unable to see console using VNC on ESX hypervisor

Hi All, I have configured OpenStack Grizzly to control ESX hypervisor. I can successfully launch instances but unable to see its console using VNC. Following is my configuration. ***Compute node : nova.conf for vnc: vnc_enabled = true novncproxy_base_url=http://public_ip_of_controller:6080/

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Does Nova really need an SQL database?

On 11/21/2013 02:58 AM, Soren Hansen wrote: 2013/11/20 Chris Friesen : What about a hybrid solution? There is data that is only used by the scheduler--for performance reasons maybe it would make sense to store that information in RAM as described at https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/n

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Find the compute host on which a VM runs

On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 8:12 AM, Robert Kukura wrote: > On 11/21/2013 04:20 AM, Stefan Apostoaie wrote: > > Hello again, > > > > I studied the portbindings extension (the quantum.db.portbindings_db and > > quantum.extensions.portbindings modules). However it's unclear for me > > who sets the port

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] rough draft of Heat autoscaling API

On 21/11/13 18:44, Christopher Armstrong wrote: 2) It relies on a plugin being present for any type of thing you might want to notify. I don't understand this point. What do you mean by a plugin? I was assuming OS::Neutron::PoolMember (not LoadBalancerMember -- I went and looked up the

Re: [openstack-dev] Top Gate Bugs

On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 11:53:45 PM, Clark Boylan wrote: On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 9:43 PM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: Hi Joe, 2013/11/20 Joe Gordon : Hi All, As many of you have noticed the gate has been in very bad shape over the past few days. Here is a list of some of the top open

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Does Nova really need an SQL database?

On 21/11/13 15:49, Chris Friesen wrote: On 11/21/2013 02:58 AM, Soren Hansen wrote: 2013/11/20 Chris Friesen : What about a hybrid solution? There is data that is only used by the scheduler--for performance reasons maybe it would make sense to store that information in RAM as described at http

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack][qa][Tempest][Network] Test for external connectivity

Forgive my ignorance, but I would like to make sure that packets generated from Openstack instances on neutron private networks will actually be able to reach public addresses. In its default configuration the traffic from the OS instance is SNATed and the SRC IP will be rewritten to an address in

Re: [openstack-dev] The recent gate performance and how it affects you

Matt Riedemann writes: > People get heads-down in their own projects and what they are working > on and it's hard to keep up with what's going on in the infra channel > (or nova channel for that matter), so sending out a recap that > everyone can see in the mailing list is helpful to reset where

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Glance] Support of v1 and v2 glance APIs in Nova

On 11/3/2013 5:22 AM, Joe Gordon wrote: On Nov 1, 2013 6:46 PM, "John Garbutt" mailto:j...@johngarbutt.com>> wrote: > > On 29 October 2013 16:11, Eddie Sheffield mailto:eddie.sheffi...@rackspace.com>> wrote: > > > > "John Garbutt" mailto:j...@johngarbutt.com>> said: > > > >> Going back t

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][heat][[keystone] RFC: introducing "request identification"

On 11/19/13 at 08:04pm, haruka tanizawa wrote: Hi stackers!! I'd like to ask for your opinions about my idea of identifying request. Challenges == We have no way to know the final result of an API request. Indeed we can continuously get the status of allocated resources, but this is ju

Re: [openstack-dev] How to best make User Experience a priority in every project

On Nov 20, 2013, at 9:09 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Hi everyone, > > How should we proceed to make sure UX (user experience) is properly > taken into account into OpenStack development ? Historically it was hard > for UX sessions (especially the ones that affect multiple projects, like > CLI /

[openstack-dev] [nova][scheduler][metrics] Additional metrics

Hello, I'm in the process of writing a new scheduling algorithm for openstack nova. I have a set of compute nodes that I'm going to filter and weigh according to some metrics collected from these compute nodes. I saw nova.compute.resource_tracker and metrics (ram, disk and cpu) that it collects fr

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Oslo] Future of Key Distribution Server, Trusted Messaging

The Barbican team has been taking a look at the KDS feature and the proposed patch and I think this may be better placed in Barbican rather than Keystone. The patch, from what I can tell, seems to require that a service account create & use a key under its own tenant. In this use case, Barbican can

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Great response to yesterday's Gate Priority

Hello Neutron: Just wanted to extend a hearty pat on the back to all of Neutron for helping to comply with yesterdays gate prioritization: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-November/019949.html We had a lot of really good activity in the -neutron channel: http://eavesdrop.op

[openstack-dev] [savanna] team meeting Nov 21

Hi folks, We'll be having the Savanna team meeting as usual in #openstack-meeting-alt channel. Agenda: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/SavannaAgenda#Agenda_for_November.2C_21 http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Savanna+Meeting&iso=20131121T18 Sincerely yours, Ser

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][heat][[keystone] RFC: introducing "request identification"

Thanks for your reply. >I'm working on the implementation of instance-tasks-api[0] in Nova and this is what I've been moving towards so far. Yes, I know. I think that is good idea. >The API will accept a string to be a part of the task but it will have meaning only to the client, not to Nova. Th

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Does cinder support HDS AMS 2300 storage now?

Did you test on it? That's meaning the CLI on both AMS and HUS are the same? Right? On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 4:14 AM, Steven Sonnenberg < steven.sonnenb...@hds.com> wrote: > On *Thu Nov 21 03:32:10 UTC 2013, Lei asked:* > > I just found the HUS is supported. But I have a old AMS storage machine

Re: [openstack-dev] Introducing the new OpenStack service for Containers

I wish we can make a decision during this meeting. Is it confirmed for Friday 9am pacific? On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 8:24 AM, Chuck Short wrote: > Hi > > Has a decision happened when this meeting is going to take place, assuming > it is still taking place tomorrow. > > Regards > chuck > > > On Mon,

Re: [openstack-dev] [ALL] Wheel-enabling patches

On 21/11/13 18:44 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote: Greetings, There are some patches that add support for building wheels. The patch adds a `[wheel]` section with `universal = True` `universal=True` means the applications supports py2/py3 which is not the case for most (all?) openstack projects. So

Re: [openstack-dev] Unable to see console using VNC on ESX hypervisor

Please do not cross-post messages to multiple mailing lists. The openstack-dev list is for development discussion only, so this belongs on the general openstack list. Thanks. -Ben On 2013-11-21 07:33, Rajshree Thorat wrote: Hi All, I have configured OpenStack Grizzly to control ESX hypervi

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Oslo] Future of Key Distribution Server, Trusted Messaging

On 11/21/2013 03:08 PM, Jarret Raim wrote: The Barbican team has been taking a look at the KDS feature and the proposed patch and I think this may be better placed in Barbican rather than Keystone. The patch, from what I can tell, seems to require that a service account create & use a key under i

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Easier way of trying TripleO

On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 6:57 PM, Robert Collins wrote: > On 20 November 2013 10:40, James Slagle wrote: >> I'd like to propose an idea around a simplified and complimentary version of >> devtest that makes it easier for someone to get started and try TripleO. > > I think its a grand idea (in fact

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] Javascript development improvement

Hi, I also don't see an issue with using nodejs in Horizon development environment. Is the problem in Django not differentiating the development and production environments by default? Could the problem be resolved by having two different environments with the two requirements files etc. simil

Re: [openstack-dev] How to best make User Experience a priority in every project

> On Nov 21, 2013, at 10:43 AM, "Ben Nemec" wrote: > >> On 2013-11-21 10:20, Jesse Noller wrote: >>> On Nov 20, 2013, at 9:09 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: >>> Hi everyone, >>> How should we proceed to make sure UX (user experience) is properly >>> taken into account into OpenStack development ? H

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder][Glance] OSLO update

On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 3:37 AM, Elena Ezhova wrote: > > 20.11.2013, 06:18, "John Griffith" : > > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Mark McLoughlin > wrote: > > > On Mon, 2013-11-18 at 17:24 +, Duncan Thomas wrote: > >> Random OSLO updates with no list of what changed, what got fixed etc

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Oslo] Future of Key Distribution Server, Trusted Messaging

So i've a feeling that this was proposed and dismissed once before. I don't remember why. So my concern with barbican is that i'm under the impression that barbican was going to be an 'overcloud' service. That's a really bad way of putting it, but it is service and user facing and discovered via t

Re: [openstack-dev] Introducing the new OpenStack service for Containers

Sounds good to me, let's get everyone on the same page before diving into the weeds. That said, since so much depends on the delta to the Nova API and the actual use-cases we want to support, think we should spend at least some time focusing on the direction (and maybe even the details?) that that

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][scheduler][metrics] Additional metrics

Abbass MAROUNI wrote on 2013-11-21: > Hello, > > I'm in the process of writing a new scheduling algorithm for openstack nova. > I have a set of compute nodes that I'm going to filter and weigh according to > some metrics collected from these compute nodes. > I saw nova.compute.resource_tracker a

Re: [openstack-dev] Introducing the new OpenStack service for Containers

Can we make sure that the costs for the end users are also considered as part of this ? - Configuration management will need further modules - Dashboard confusion as we get multiple tabs - Accounting, Block Storage, Networking, Orchestration confusion as the concep

[openstack-dev] [neutron] [policy] Logs and notes from first Neutron Policy IRC meeting

HI all! The Neutron Policy sub-team had it's first IRC meeting today [1]. Relevant logs from the meeting are here [2]. We're hoping to continue the discussion going forward. I've noted action items in both the meeting logs and on the wiki page. We'll cover those for the next meeting we have. Note

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] meaning of resource_id in a meter

> In all cases, these are free string fields. `user_id' and `project_id' > map to Keystone _most of the time_, i'm sort of torn between the two -- which is why i brought it up i guess. i like the flexibility of having resource as a free string field but the difference between resource and projec

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Find the compute host on which a VM runs

Hi Stefan, HOST_ID is set by the client. In most usual case nova compute set binding:host_id. On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 6:20 PM, Stefan Apostoaie wrote: > Hello again, > > I studied the portbindings extension (the quantum.db.portbindings_db and > quantum.extensions.portbindings modules). However

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Support for Type-1 Hypervisors

Hi Stackers, First of all: I am not a TripleO/baremetal expert. I am looking at ways how to fit Type 1 hypervisors to TripleO. I am not sure how other such hypervisors integrate with OS, but in my case - XenServer - ,I have a VM that runs nova - let's call it domU - , and that's talking to the hy

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] rough draft of Heat autoscaling API

On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Zane Bitter wrote: > On 21/11/13 18:44, Christopher Armstrong wrote: > >> >> 2) It relies on a plugin being present for any type of thing you >> might want to notify. >> >> >> I don't understand this point. What do you mean by a plugin? I was >> assuming

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT software configuration refined after design summit discussions

Thomas Spatzier wrote on 11/21/2013 02:48:14 AM: > ... > Now thinking more about update scenarios (which we can leave for an > iteration after the initial deployment is working), I recommend thinking about UPDATE from the start. We should have an implementation in which CREATE and UPDATE share

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Schduler] Volunteers wanted for a modest proposal for an external scheduler in our lifetime

Robert, It is nice that community like idea of making one scheduler as a service. But I saw in https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/icehouse-external-schedulersome misleading about https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/no-db-scheduler Approach no-db-scheduler is actually base step that allows

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Schduler] Volunteers wanted for a modest proposal for an external scheduler in our lifetime

On 22 November 2013 15:57, Boris Pavlovic wrote: > Robert, > > It is nice that community like idea of making one scheduler as a service. > > > But I saw in https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/icehouse-external-scheduler > some misleading about > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/no-db-sched

Re: [openstack-dev] Top Gate Bugs

On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 2:28 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > > > On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 11:53:45 PM, Clark Boylan wrote: > >> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 9:43 PM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Joe, >>> >>> 2013/11/20 Joe Gordon : >>> Hi All, As many of you have noticed the

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack][nova][social-apects] Social aspects shouldn't impact on dev process

On 11/20/2013 02:06 AM, Boris Pavlovic wrote: I faced some social problems in community. We started working on purge engine for DB (before HK summit) This is very important, because at this moment we don't have any working way to purge DB... so admins should make it by hand. And we made this

Re: [openstack-dev] Search Project - summit follow up

On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Dolph Mathews wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Dmitri Zimin(e) | StackStorm < > d...@stackstorm.com> wrote: > >> Thanks Terry for highlighting this: >> >> Yes, tenant isolation is the must. It's not reflected in the prototype - >> it queries Solr directl

  1   2   >