Re: [openstack-dev] [Climate] Use Taskflow for leases start/end ?

Hi Joshua, Thanks for replying :-) I was a bit worried by [1], is it still the case ? Are your patterns still in rewrite ? [1] https://github.com/stackforge/taskflow/blob/master/taskflow/examples/fake_boot_vm.py#L8 -Sylvain Le 23/09/2013 18:57, Joshua Harlow a écrit : Howdy there! Taskf

Re: [openstack-dev] [tuskar] pecan models vs. db models

On 23/09/13 21:59, Doug Hellmann wrote: > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Petr Blaho wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> during my work on getting tests to pass for >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/46947/ I discovered that we are >> misusing pecan models for HTTP representation of Resources. >> >> In cont

[openstack-dev] Reminder: Project & release status meeting - 21:00 UTC

Today in the project/release status meeting, we'll close the last standing feature freeze exceptions and review progress towards the publication of the first release candidates. In particular, we'll review the state of RC1 buglists and see if the current bugfixing velocity is compatible with the pr

[openstack-dev] [Jenkins} Gating broken

Hi, Anyone know the root cause of: 2013-09-24 06:47:01.670 | Cleaning up... 2013-09-24 06:47:01.670 | No distributions matching the version for pyparsing>=2.0.1 (from cliff>=1.4.3->python-neutronclient>=2.3.0,<3->-r /home/jenkins/workspace/gate-nova-pep8/requirements.txt (line 25)) 2013-09-24 0

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Token's project (tenant) not passed to API layer (v2.py) from auth_token.py

On Tue, Sep 24 2013, Pendergrass, Eric wrote: > Hi, I'm struggling with a problem related to tokens. I have one token for > which the project ID gets passed to v2.MeterController.get_all() in the > kwargs: > > > > (Pdb) kwargs > > {'project': u'10032339952700', 'meter': u'network.outgoing.bytes

Re: [openstack-dev] [LBaaS][Horizon] Subnet for VIP?

Hi Fank, That looks like Horizon limitation that is bound to current reference implementation of lbaas service where VIP should be on a subnet where pool's memebers are. So it's not a bug. Expect this to change in Icehouse. Thanks, Eugene. On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 9:19 AM, wrote: > Hi, > > Wh

[openstack-dev] [nova] Jenkins} Gating broken

This just seems to affect Nova. Thanks Gary From: Administrator mailto:gkot...@vmware.com>> Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 11:15 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.opensta

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Jenkins} Gating broken

On 24/09/13 11:10, Gary Kotton wrote: > This just seems to affect Nova. > Thanks > Gary > > From: Administrator mailto:gkot...@vmware.com>> > Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List Sadly not. Horizon seems to be broken for the same reason. Matthias ___

Re: [openstack-dev] Client and Policy

On 23/09/13 15:21 -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: The policy code seems very tightly associated with the keystone work. There's no reason for Oslo to be the only program releasing reusable libraries. We should consider having the Keystone team manage the policy library in a repo they own. I'd love to

Re: [openstack-dev] Reminder: Project & release status meeting - 21:00 UTC

On 24 September 2013 20:08, Thierry Carrez wrote: > All Technical Leads for integrated programs should be present (if you > can't make it, please name a substitute on [1]). Other program leads and > everyone else is very welcome to attend. Should that be 'programs with integrated projects', since

Re: [openstack-dev] [Jenkins} Gating broken

On 24/09/13 10:15, Gary Kotton wrote: > Hi, > Anyone know the root cause of: > > 2013-09-24 06:47:01.670 | Cleaning up... > 2013-09-24 06:47:01.670 | No distributions matching the version for > pyparsing>=2.0.1 (from cliff>=1.4.3->python-neutronclient>=2.3.0,<3->-r > /home/jenkins/workspace/gate

[openstack-dev] [Nova] Virtio-Serial support for Nova libvirt driver

Hi, Virtio-Serial interface support for Nova - Libvirt is not available now. Some VMs who wants to access the Host may need like running qemu-guest-agent or any proprietary software want to use this mode of communication with Host. Qemu-GA uses virtio-serial communication. We want to propose a

Re: [openstack-dev] Reminder: Project & release status meeting - 21:00 UTC

Robert Collins wrote: > On 24 September 2013 20:08, Thierry Carrez wrote: >> All Technical Leads for integrated programs should be present (if you >> can't make it, please name a substitute on [1]). Other program leads and >> everyone else is very welcome to attend. > > Should that be 'programs w

Re: [openstack-dev] [Jenkins} Gating broken

Nikola Đipanov wrote: > On 24/09/13 10:15, Gary Kotton wrote: >> Hi, >> Anyone know the root cause of: >> >> 2013-09-24 06:47:01.670 | Cleaning up... >> 2013-09-24 06:47:01.670 | No distributions matching the version for >> pyparsing>=2.0.1 (from cliff>=1.4.3->python-neutronclient>=2.3.0,<3->-r >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Jenkins} Gating broken

On 09/24/2013 06:44 AM, Nikola Đipanov wrote: On 24/09/13 10:15, Gary Kotton wrote: Hi, Anyone know the root cause of: 2013-09-24 06:47:01.670 | Cleaning up... 2013-09-24 06:47:01.670 | No distributions matching the version for pyparsing>=2.0.1 (from cliff>=1.4.3->python-neutronclient>=2.3.0,<

Re: [openstack-dev] [Jenkins} Gating broken

On 09/24/2013 07:27 AM, Sean Dague wrote: On 09/24/2013 06:44 AM, Nikola Đipanov wrote: On 24/09/13 10:15, Gary Kotton wrote: Hi, Anyone know the root cause of: 2013-09-24 06:47:01.670 | Cleaning up... 2013-09-24 06:47:01.670 | No distributions matching the version for pyparsing>=2.0.1 (from c

Re: [openstack-dev] [Jenkins} Gating broken

On 24/09/13 13:27, Sean Dague wrote: > > And to members of our community who are also maintainers of python > libraries, I'd ask that you please be really cognizant of when you move > requirements up major versions, and please us that as criteria to bump > your version numbers at least a minor lev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Jenkins} Gating broken

On 09/24/2013 07:36 AM, Sean Dague wrote: Hmmm... the issue being the infra pip mirrors take some time to update, so here is the cliff capping review which should get the system running again: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/48019/ Which still apparently doesn't address the whole issue... be

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] Ceilometer Alarm management page

On Tue, Sep 24 2013, Ladislav Smola wrote: > Well for example, if we find metrics, that can be used for measuring health > (this is probably more undercloud talking, or hardware metrics in general), > we could do something like "I want this alarm on all resources of this > type", > if there will b

[openstack-dev] test

test___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] Ceilometer Alarm management page

On 09/24/2013 02:22 PM, Julien Danjou wrote: On Tue, Sep 24 2013, Ladislav Smola wrote: Well for example, if we find metrics, that can be used for measuring health (this is probably more undercloud talking, or hardware metrics in general), we could do something like "I want this alarm on all re

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] Ceilometer Alarm management page

On Tue, Sep 24 2013, Ladislav Smola wrote: > Yes it would be good if something like this would be supported. -> > relation of alarm to multiple entities, that > are result of sample-api query. Could it be worth creating a BP? Probably indeed. -- Julien Danjou # Free Software hacker # independe

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] Ceilometer Alarm management page

I think Dragon's BP for notification triggers would solve this problem. Instead of looking at it as applying a single alarm to several resources, you could instead leverage the similarities of the resources: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+spec/notifications-triggers. Compound that w

[openstack-dev] Scheduler sub-group meeting on 9/24

Hi, Done is still away on his vacation (lucky guy). Last week we did not have time to discuss the proposals by Mike Spreitzer (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hQQGHId-z1A5LOipnBXFhsU3VAMQdSe-UXvL4VPY4ps/edit). Today can give us an opportunity to go over that and additional scheduling developm

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] [scheduler] Bringing things together for Icehouse

On 24/09/13 05:31, Mike Spreitzer wrote: I was not trying to raise issues of geographic dispersion and other higher level structures, I think the issues I am trying to raise are relevant even without them. This is not to deny the importance, or relevance, of higher levels of structure. But I wo

[openstack-dev] [Tuskar] The last IRC meeting

I planned to cancel today's meeting, but I was reminded that we ought to finish the naming votes from the last week and it would be good to talk a bit more about the Tuskar coming under TripleO. The time: Tuesday, 24th September, 2013 at 19:00 UTC The agenda: * Discuss merger with TripleO in

[openstack-dev] Basic questions about climate

Climate is about reserving resources. Are those physical resources or virtual ones? Where was I supposed to read the answer to basic questions like that? If climate is about reserving virtual resources, how is that different from "scheduling" them? Thanks, Mike___

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Virtio-Serial support for Nova libvirt driver

There is implementation for qemu guest agent checked into the code. https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/qemu-guest-agent-support On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 3:40 AM, P Balaji-B37839 wrote: > Hi, > > Virtio-Serial interface support for Nova - Libvirt is not available now. > Some VMs who wants

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Virtio-Serial support for Nova libvirt driver

On Sep 24, 2013, at 6:40 PM, P Balaji-B37839 wrote: > Hi, > > Virtio-Serial interface support for Nova - Libvirt is not available now. Some > VMs who wants to access the Host may need like running qemu-guest-agent or > any proprietary software want to use this mode of communication with Host.

Re: [openstack-dev] Oslo PTL election

On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Adam Young wrote: > On 09/23/2013 02:37 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > >> Hey >> >> I meant to send this as soon as nominations opened - I figure that >> incumbent PTLs should make it clear if they don't intend to nominate >> themselves for re-election. >> >> To tha

[openstack-dev] tools for making upstreaming / backporting easier in git

Hi all, Back in April, I created some wrapper scripts around git-cherry(1) and git-notes(1), which can help when you have more than a trivial number of commits to upstream or backport from one branch to another. Since then I've improved these tools, and also written a higher-level CLI which shoul

Re: [openstack-dev] Basic questions about climate

Hello Mike, all. We are planning to support both virtual and physical resources in Climate. There are several documents that describe our view on how this service should look like: [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Resource-reservation-service [2] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vsN9LLq9

Re: [openstack-dev] Client and Policy

On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 9:56 PM, Adam Young wrote: > On 09/23/2013 03:21 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 4:25 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: > >> On 20/09/13 15:20 -0700, Monty Taylor wrote: >> >>> On 09/20/2013 02:55 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: >>> Not from a Gerrit perspe

Re: [openstack-dev] Client and Policy

On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 5:00 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: > On 23/09/13 15:21 -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > >> The policy code seems very tightly associated with the keystone work. >> There's >> no reason for Oslo to be the only program releasing reusable libraries. We >> should consider having the

Re: [openstack-dev] [LBaaS][Horizon] Subnet for VIP?

I didn't know current lbaas plugin has such limitation. Although I think the UI should not incur such limitation as the lbaas API definition does allow this, I'm fine with it. Thanks, -Kaiwei - Original Message - From: "Eugene Nikanorov" To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List"

[openstack-dev] Hyper-V Meeting

Hi All, Quick agenda for today's Hyper-V Meeting. * Puppet module changes. * Summit Updates Peter J. Pouliot, CISSP Senior SDET, OpenStack Microsoft New England Research & Development Center One Memorial Drive,Cambridge, MA 02142 ppoul...@microsoft.com

Re: [openstack-dev] [LBaaS][Horizon] Subnet for VIP?

VIP can be on a different subnet than the members are on. But we need to set up a router so that the haproxy can work. On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 11:40 PM, wrote: > I didn't know current lbaas plugin has such limitation. Although I think > the UI should not incur such limitation as the lbaas API d

Re: [openstack-dev] On the usage of pip vs. setup.py install

Hi Monty, On 09/24/2013 09:44 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: > Instead of: > > "python setup.py install" > > Run: > > "pip install ." No way that this happens on the packaging side. Buildd have no network access (on purpose), and we must not do any network access when building. So I wonder what this

Re: [openstack-dev] On the usage of pip vs. setup.py install

My plague is feeling much better now, thanks. Keeping using pip! Anita. On 09/23/2013 09:43 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: I wonder who got the plague if u got the food :-/ Sent from my really tiny device... On Sep 23, 2013, at 8:07 PM, "Michael Basnight" wrote: But I got suddenly full. Interes

Re: [openstack-dev] On the usage of pip vs. setup.py install

On 09/24/2013 12:11 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Hi Monty, > > On 09/24/2013 09:44 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: >> Instead of: >> >> "python setup.py install" >> >> Run: >> >> "pip install ." > > No way that this happens on the packaging side. Buildd have no network > access (on purpose), and we must

[openstack-dev] [Scheduler] API extension for instance groups

Hi Folks Sorry for missing today's meeting. Was reading the logs http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/scheduling/2013/scheduling.2013-09-24-15.03.log.html Regarding the API: the instance groups API extension could be used as a starting point although it could be refined. Right now its quite

Re: [openstack-dev] [Climate] Use Taskflow for leases start/end ?

Never worry! That is being actively fixed right now (as we speak). Good catch though :) https://review.openstack.org/#/c/47562/ Jump in #openstack-state-management if u want to chat. :) -Josh From: Sylvain Bauza mailto:sylvain.ba...@bull.net>> Date: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 12:02 AM To: Jos

[openstack-dev] [Ironic] PTL nomination

Hi! I would like to nominate myself for the OpenStack Bare Metal Provisioning (Ironic) PTL position. I have been working with OpenStack for over 18 months, and was a scalability and performance consultant at Percona for four years prior. Since '99, I have worked as a developer, team lead, databas

[openstack-dev] Glance PTL candidacy

Hi all, I'd like to submit myself as a candidate to continue in the role of Glance PTL for the Icehouse release cycle. A bit of history about me: I joined Rackspace's Team Titan back in February 2011, where were initially focused on filling out the OpenStack 1.1 api for nova. I've been working wi

Re: [openstack-dev] [Jenkins} Gating broken

On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 1:15 AM, Gary Kotton wrote: > Hi, > Anyone know the root cause of: > > 2013-09-24 06:47:01.670 | Cleaning up... > 2013-09-24 06:47:01.670 | No distributions matching the version for > pyparsing>=2.0.1 (from cliff>=1.4.3->python-neutronclient>=2.3.0,<3->-r > /home/jenkins

[openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][IceHouse] Ceilometer + Kibana + ElasticSearch Integration

Celiometer Team, I am a developer on the Project Meniscus team. I noticed the conversation on adding ElasticSearch and Kibana to Ceilometer and thought I would share some information regarding our project. I would love to discuss a way our projects could work together on some of these common

[openstack-dev] [savanna] Incubator Application Q&A section

Hello, I've added new section to Savanna Incubator Application with recent questions and answers: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Savanna/Incubation#Raised_Questions_.2B_Answers And here are details about integration with Heat: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Savanna/HeatIntegration Thanks.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Infra] Meeting Tuesday September 24th at 19:00 UTC

On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph wrote: > The OpenStack Infrastructure (Infra) team is hosting our weekly > meeting tomorrow, Tuesday September 24th, at 19:00 UTC in > #openstack-meeting Meeting minutes and logs: Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/2

[openstack-dev] Current list of confirmed PTL Candidates

I currently have the following list of confirmed PTL candidates: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/PTL_Elections_Fall_2013#Candidates Confirmed candidates for Fall 2013 PTL Elections (alphabetically by last name): * Compute (Nova) o Russell Bryant

Re: [openstack-dev] [savanna-dashboard] version 0.3 - updated UI mockups for EDP workflow

Chad & Nadya, Sorry for the late reply on this, I've been meaning to send some thoughts and finally had some time today to pull it all together :) First off, an additional place that you should feel free to post wireframes/design ideas and have a discussion is on our G+ OpenStack UX page: https

Re: [openstack-dev] Current list of confirmed PTL Candidates

To confirm, we have a little bit over a day left for people to nominate, right? On a personal note, I'm a little sad to see so many single candidate elections. I guess it might indicate a strong consensus, but I worry it encourages group think over time. Michael On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 6:08 AM,

Re: [openstack-dev] Current list of confirmed PTL Candidates

On 09/24/2013 04:15 PM, Michael Still wrote: To confirm, we have a little bit over a day left for people to nominate, right? Confirmed. "Nominations for OpenStack PTLs (Project Technical Leads) ... will remain open until 23:59 UTC September 26, 2013" http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/opens

Re: [openstack-dev] Current list of confirmed PTL Candidates

+2 I think we need to as a community figure out why this is the case and figure out ways to make it not the case. Is it education around what a PTL is? Is it lack of time? Is it something else? -Josh On 9/24/13 1:15 PM, "Michael Still" wrote: >To confirm, we have a little bit over a day left

[openstack-dev] [Tuskar] [UI] Introducing POC Wireframes

Hey folks, I want to introduce our direction of Tuskar UI, currently described with POC wireframes. Keep in mind, that wireframes which I am sending were made for purpose of proof of concept (which was built and released in August) and there are various changes since then, which were already

[openstack-dev] [Glance] Team Meeting Reminder

Hi folks, Just to remind you, we'll be having a team meeting this Thursday, September 26th at 14:00 UTC. For your local time, please see http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Glance+Meeting&iso=20130926T14&ah=1 . In particular, we'll want to make sure we've signed off on RC1 or

[openstack-dev] [Swift] PTL Candidacy

I would like to nominate myself for PTL of Swift. I've been involved in OpenStack Swift since it started, and I'd like to share a few of the thins in-progress and where I want to see Swift go. Swift has always been a world-class storage system, proven at scale and production-ready from day one. I

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] [scheduler] Bringing things together for Icehouse

Joining the party late :) I think there have been a lot of interesting ideas around wholistic scheduling over the last few summits. However seems there is no clear agreement on 1) where it should be specified and implemented 2) what the specifications look like - VRT, policies, templates etc etc e

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] Ceilometer Alarm management page

> > 3. There is a thought about watching correlation of multiple alarm > > histories in one Chart (either Alarm Histories, or the real statistics > > the Alarm is defined by). Do you think it will be needed? Any real > > life examples you have in mind? > > I think the first use case is to debug co

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tuskar] [UI] Introducing POC Wireframes

Really digging a lot of that. Particularly the inter-rack/inter-node communication stuff around page 36ish or so. I’m concerned about using the term “Class”. Maybe it’s just me as a developer, but I couldn’t think of a more generic, less inherently meaningful word there. I read through it and I

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tuskar] [UI] Introducing POC Wireframes

A few quick notes. Flavors need their extra attributes to be editable (e.g. architecture, raid config etc) - particularly in the undercloud, but it's also relevant for overcloud : If we're creating flavors for deployers, we need to expose the full capabilities of flavors. Secondly, if we're creat

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Tuskar merging with TripleO

Hi, as previously mentioned here, we're going to merge the Tuskar effort into TripleO: we're both focused on deploying OpenStack - and thats a holistic thing, not just 'getting the code onto some servers'; the Tuskar contributors have had a few days to talk through and noone has objected, so it's n

Re: [openstack-dev] On the usage of pip vs. setup.py install

On 09/25/2013 12:20 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: > > > On 09/24/2013 12:11 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: >> Hi Monty, >> >> On 09/24/2013 09:44 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: >>> Instead of: >>> >>> "python setup.py install" >>> >>> Run: >>> >>> "pip install ." >> >> No way that this happens on the packaging sid

[openstack-dev] [Common] context-is-admin causes project_id to not be passed to API layer

While debugging a token auth problem I noticed that the enforcer searches the role list in a token for a role called 'admin' (any case). If it's present, the enforcer returns true and the acl does not set the X-Project-Id header on the request. I was wondering what the reason for not setting p

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Generalising racks :- modelling a datacentre

One of the major things Tuskar does is model a datacenter - which is very useful for error correlation, capacity planning and scheduling. Long term I'd like this to be held somewhere where it is accessible for schedulers and ceilometer etc. E.g. network topology + switch information might be held

Re: [openstack-dev] [Swift] PTL Candidacy

Good plan! On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 6:40 AM, John Dickinson wrote: > I would like to nominate myself for PTL of Swift. > > I've been involved in OpenStack Swift since it started, and I'd like > to share a few of the thins in-progress and where I want to see Swift > go. > > Swift has always been

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] [scheduler] Bringing things together for Icehouse (now featuring software orchestration)

Let me elaborate a little on my thoughts about software orchestration, and respond to the recent mails from Zane and Debo. I have expanded my picture at https://docs.google.com/drawings/d/1Y_yyIpql5_cdC8116XrBHzn6GfP_g0NHTTG_W4o0R9U and added a companion picture at https://docs.google.com/dra

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] [scheduler] Bringing things together for Icehouse (now featuring software orchestration)

Excerpts from Mike Spreitzer's message of 2013-09-24 22:03:21 -0700: > Let me elaborate a little on my thoughts about software orchestration, and > respond to the recent mails from Zane and Debo. I have expanded my > picture at > https://docs.google.com/drawings/d/1Y_yyIpql5_cdC8116XrBHzn6GfP_g