Hey *,
I have registered a new blueprint regarding additional verbosity information
within API fault messages (can be viewed here:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/oslo/+spec/additional-fault-verbos).
Your thoughts and comments are more than welcome!
Thanks,
Maty.
On Thu, Aug 29 2013, Gordon Chung wrote:
> the first question is, Ceilometer currently does metering/alarming/maybe a
> few other things... will it go beyond that? specifically: capacity
> planning, optimization, dashboard(i assume this falls under
> horizon/ceilometer plugin work), analytics.
On 29 August 2013 17:33, Christopher Yeoh wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 15:56:33 +
> Joshua Harlow wrote:
>
>> Shrinking that rotation granularity would be reasonable to. Rotate
>> once every 2 weeks or some other time period still seems useful to me.
>>
>
> I wonder if the quality of reviewin
Gordon Chung wrote on 2013-08-29:
> so we're in the process of selling Ceilometer to product teams so that
> they'll adopt it and we'll get more funding :). one item that comes
> up from product teams is 'what will Ceilometer be able to do and where does
> the product takeover and add value?'
>
On 28/08/13 14:28 -0400, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Kurt Griffiths
wrote:
> What was wrong with qpid, rabbitmq, activemq, zeromq, ${your favorite
> queue here} that required marconi?
That's a good question. The features supported by AMQP brokers, ZMQ, and
M
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 11:36:44PM -0300, Monty Taylor wrote:
>
>
> On 08/06/2013 11:14 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
> > On 7 August 2013 11:22, Jay Buffington wrote:
> >
> >> ln -s /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/libvirtmod_qemu.so
> >> $(VENV)/lib/python2.6/site-packages/
> >>
> >> Why is
Hi Sam,
that's a great work and it will be for sure my default driver for my
development environment.
I have a question: once the review will be approved and the code merged
into master, do you plan to create a driver nova subteam as Xen, HyperV and
others do? I would be glad to cooperate on it.
Hi Jon,
Unfortunately, I'm not able to reproduce this issue with vanilla plugin.
The behavior you described is not correct. Here a json I used to repro an
issue:
{
"add_node_groups": [
{
"name": "worker-tasktracker",
"count":1,
+1
I believe the important point here is to identify additional metrics required
and the relevant attributes which can be specified and have them returned to
the Collector. Then in turn the collector can either push/pull those
metrics/etc into an Anlytics Engine and tools. Its not a good idea t
- Original Message -
> From: "Matt Riedemann"
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List"
> Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2013 9:24:21 PM
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Glance revert to fix image deletes on F19
>
> Dan,
>
> I saw you abandoned the patch because:
>
> "Using Sqlalchemy 0.
On 08/29/2013 05:20 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29 2013, Gordon Chung wrote:
>
>> the first question is, Ceilometer currently does metering/alarming/maybe a
>> few other things... will it go beyond that? specifically: capacity
>> planning, optimization, dashboard(i assume this falls
I'm having problems getting Swift / Python to find and load middleware for the
proxy-server. As I remove entries from the pipeline line, the next entry gets
an error. So something itsn't setup correctly anymore. Looking for suggestions
on what needs to be done to get Swift and Python to play nic
I find that kind of flexibility quite valuable for plugin developers. +1 to
this. I'd like to be involved if possible with helping you with it.
From: balaji patnala mailto:patnala...@gmail.com>>
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Date: Thu, 29
Hi,
>From sometime today, I am not any more able to run ./run_tests.sh. It gives
the following error,
*Running `tools/with_venv.sh python setup.py testr --testr-args='--subunit
'`*
*db type could not be determined*
*error: testr failed (3)*
*
*
*Ran 0 tests in 6.989s*
I tried recreating my virt
I am currently using the UI for scaling (I can try switching to REST
invocations), but here is what is passed to validate_scaling:
Cluster with 2 node groups, total count=2:
[,
]
additional:
{: 1}
existing:
{u'slave': 2}
However, by the time scale_cluster is called the cluster has been upd
On 2013-08-29 00:28, Christopher Yeoh wrote:
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 09:58:48 -0400
Joe Gordon wrote:
On a related note, I really like when the developer adds a gerrit
comment saying why the revision, that makes my life as a reviewer
easier.
+1 - I try to remember to do this and from a reviewer
Hi,
While developing some neutron extensions, one question came up on Cells.
Appreciate any comments.
According to this table in operations guide, a cell shares nova-api and
keystone, but does not talk about other services.
I understand from few that Neutron service need to be shared across
add-apt-repository -y ppa:swift-core/release
^ is that a thing?
How sure are you that you're running 1.9.2.6.g3b48a71 ?
https://launchpad.net/~swift-core/+archive/release
Try:
python -c 'import swift; print swift.__version__'
python -c 'import swift.common.middleware.catch_errors; print "SUCCE
On 08/29/2013 04:25 AM, Robert Collins wrote:
> On 29 August 2013 17:33, Christopher Yeoh wrote:
>> On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 15:56:33 +
>> Joshua Harlow wrote:
>>
>>> Shrinking that rotation granularity would be reasonable to. Rotate
>>> once every 2 weeks or some other time period still seems use
Hi Jaume,
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 5:11 AM, Jaume Devesa wrote:
> Hi Sam,
>
> that's a great work and it will be for sure my default driver for my
> development environment.
Thanks!
> I have a question: once the review will be approved and the code merged into
> master, do you plan to create a d
To add to this, the majority of my reviews come out of the period in the
morning before my team's daily standup. I've found that sufficient for
getting some reviews in, and conversely, fights off the tremendous burnout
I used to get when we had review days back in the beginning of the project.
---
Hi Murali,
I think the idea to provide enhanced data protection in OpenStack is a
great idea, and I have been thinking about backup in OpenStack for a while
now.
I just not sure a new project is the only way to do.
(as disclosure, I contributed code to enable IBM TSM as a Cinder backup
driver)
Thanks everyone who have joined Savanna meeting.
Here are the logs from the meeting:
Minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/savanna/2013/savanna.2013-08-29-18.07.html
Minutes (text):
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/savanna/2013/savanna.2013-08-29-18.07.txt
Log:
http://eavesdr
I have also found a technique that works for me.
Have side-projects that u can work on that let u not just focus on a
single projects reviews.
I for example jump between: anvil, cloud-init, taskflow (and the other
openstack components).
I've found out that the variety there also helps.
On 8/29/
On 8/28/2013 3:12 PM, Murali Balcha wrote:
Hello Stackers,
We would like to introduce a new project Raksha, a Data Protection As a
Service (DPaaS) for OpenStack Cloud.
Raksha’s primary goal is to provide a comprehensive Data Protection for
OpenStack by leveraging Nova, Swift, Glance and Cinder.
Does anyone know what too is used to do mockups ?
Endre
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Heat devs,
Liang pointed out a race-condition in the current multi-engine
implementation that will be difficult to fix without a DB lock. I've
discussed the multi-engine design with my teammates and written up a few
alternative designs here:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/vJKcZcQOU9
Every design
This has a +2 on it:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/41522/
And it's holding up a patch that has two +2s:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/41543/
Which is part of a blueprint topic branch, so blocking the blueprint also.
So I'd appreciate if I could get a second core reviewer to look at 415
On 8/28/13 11:28 AM, "Vishvananda Ishaya" wrote:
>
>On Aug 26, 2013, at 6:14 PM, Maru Newby wrote:
>
>>
>> On Aug 26, 2013, at 4:06 PM, Edgar Magana wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Developers,
>>>
>>> Let me explain my point of view on this topic and please share your
>>>thoughts in order to merge this new
Its an interesting discussion you brought up today. I agree there is no
clear definition of neutron service in that table. The cell goes by its
definition of ability to create instance anywhere. Then there needs to be
inter-vm communication for a given network.
I feel Neutron must be shared servic
>> From: Ronen Kat
>> Sen: Thursday, August 29, 2013 2:55 PM
>> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org; openstack-...@lists.launchpad.net
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Proposal for Raksha, a Data Protection As a
>> Service project
>> Hi Murali,
>> I th
Stay tuned. There are folks working on a proposed set of API framework
changes. This will be something that we'll discuss as part of deciding the
features in the Icehouse release.
mark
On Aug 29, 2013, at 10:08 AM, Justin Hammond
wrote:
> I find that kind of flexibility quite valuable for
>>> My question is, would it make sense to add to the current mechanisms in
>>> Nova and Cinder than add the complexity of a new project?
>
> I think the answer is yes :)
I meant there is a clear need for Raksha project. :)
Thanks,
Murali Balcha
On Aug 29, 2013, at 7:45 PM, "Murali Balcha"
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 1:28 AM, Vishvananda Ishaya
wrote:
>
> On Aug 26, 2013, at 6:14 PM, Maru Newby wrote:
>
> >
> > On Aug 26, 2013, at 4:06 PM, Edgar Magana wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Developers,
> >>
> >> Let me explain my point of view on this topic and please share your
> thoughts in order to me
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Murali Balcha wrote:
>
> >>> My question is, would it make sense to add to the current mechanisms in
> >>> Nova and Cinder than add the complexity of a new project?
> >
> > I think the answer is yes :)
>
>
> I meant there is a clear need for Raksha project. :)
>
Thanks Justin.
Sure, we will take your help as it is required on this. We will prepare
blue-print capturing all the details and will assign you as reviewer.
Regards,
Balaji.P
From: Justin Hammond [mailto:justin.hamm...@rackspace.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2013 7:39 PM
To: OpenStack Develop
I'm using balsamiq to make mockups.
Sincerely yours,
Sergey Lukjanov
Savanna Technical Lead
Mirantis Inc.
(sent from my phone)
30.08.2013 0:37 пользователь "Endre Karlson"
написал:
> Does anyone know what too is used to do mockups ?
>
> Endre
>
> ___
>
Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2013-08-27 14:25:47 -0700:
> http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/tripleo-reviewers-30.txt
> http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/tripleo-reviewers-90.txt
>
> - Derek is reviewing fairly regularly and has got a sense of the
> culture etc now, I thi
Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2013-08-27 14:13:37 -0700:
> On 28 August 2013 06:54, Steven Hardy wrote:
> > We had some recent discussions regarding the Heat mission statement and
> > came up with:
> >
> > "To explicitly model the relationships between OpenStack resources of all
> > ki
(sent 2 days ago, but re-sending this as it never seemed to have arrived
on the mailing list)
Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2013-08-27 14:25:47 -0700:
> http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/tripleo-reviewers-30.txt
> http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/tripleo-reviewers-90.txt
Excerpts from John Speidel's message of 2013-08-27 09:29:18 -0700:
> Some services/components are related or have dependencies on other
> services and components.As an example, in HDP, the Hive service depends
> on HBase and Zookeeper.In Savanna, there is no way to express this
> relationship.If
41 matches
Mail list logo
