On 2014-02-21 14:40:07 + (+), Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
[...]
> If I was to prioritize things given limited resources, I'd suggest that
> we should be validating that OpenStack has not broken its own code as the
> top priority. So testing lowest version would rank above testing highest
> ve
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 02/21/2014 11:02 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 10:46:22AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote:
>>> On 02/21/2014 09:45 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 02:45:03PM -0500, Sean Dague wrote:
>
>
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Mike Spreitzer wrote:
> Ah, so the only distro regularly tested is Ubuntu 12.04?
Within the OpenStack Infrastructure Team -managed environment, generally
yes (with the addition of CentOS 6 for Py26 as noted in your quote below).
However, that is not the only pl
Sean Dague wrote on 02/20/2014 02:45:03 PM:
> ...
> That being said, we also need to be a little bit careful about taking
> such a hard line about "supported vs. not" based on only what's in the
> gate. Because if we did the following things would be listed as
> unsupported (in increasing level of
On 02/21/2014 11:02 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 10:46:22AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote:
>> On 02/21/2014 09:45 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 02:45:03PM -0500, Sean Dague wrote:
So I'm one of the first people to utter "if it isn't tested,
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 10:31:06AM -0800, Joe Gordon wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I discussion recently came up inside of nova about what it means
> supported version for a dependency means. in libvirt we gate on the
> minimal version that we support but for all python dependencies we
> gate on the highe
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 10:46:22AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 02/21/2014 09:45 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 02:45:03PM -0500, Sean Dague wrote:
> >>
> >> So I'm one of the first people to utter "if it isn't tested, it's
> >> probably broken", however I also think we
On 02/21/2014 09:45 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 02:45:03PM -0500, Sean Dague wrote:
>>
>> So I'm one of the first people to utter "if it isn't tested, it's
>> probably broken", however I also think we need to be realistic about the
>> fact that if you did out the permuta
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 10:31:06AM -0800, Joe Gordon wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I discussion recently came up inside of nova about what it means
> supported version for a dependency means. in libvirt we gate on the
> minimal version that we support but for all python dependencies we
> gate on the highe
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 02:45:03PM -0500, Sean Dague wrote:
>
> So I'm one of the first people to utter "if it isn't tested, it's
> probably broken", however I also think we need to be realistic about the
> fact that if you did out the permutations of dependencies and config
> options, we'd have a
On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 10:31 -0800, Joe Gordon wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I discussion recently came up inside of nova about what it means
> supported version for a dependency means. in libvirt we gate on the
> minimal version that we support but for all python dependencies we
> gate on the highest vers
On 02/20/2014 06:30 PM, Sabari Murugesan wrote:
> But I do think running a job with lowest version may still help a
> developer realize that a feature in the latest library is not available
> in an older supported version. The person can then bump up the library's
> min version in the requirements.
But I do think running a job with lowest version may still help a developer
realize that a feature in the latest library is not available in an older
supported version. The person can then bump up the library's min version in the
requirements. Today, it;s not possible to find this out until some
On Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:06:25 -0500
Sean Dague wrote:
>
> Honestly, I think our experience in even doing a homogenous gate
> means I think we should let the distros come in with 3rd party
> testing on those results. Because we don't really have the bw, in
> either people or machines, to explode th
On 02/20/2014 05:50 PM, Christopher Yeoh wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Feb 2014 14:45:03 -0500
> Sean Dague wrote:
>>
>> So I'm one of the first people to utter "if it isn't tested, it's
>> probably broken", however I also think we need to be realistic about
>> the fact that if you did out the permutations
On Thu, 20 Feb 2014 14:45:03 -0500
Sean Dague wrote:
>
> So I'm one of the first people to utter "if it isn't tested, it's
> probably broken", however I also think we need to be realistic about
> the fact that if you did out the permutations of dependencies and
> config options, we'd have as many
On 02/20/2014 01:31 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I discussion recently came up inside of nova about what it means
> supported version for a dependency means. in libvirt we gate on the
> minimal version that we support but for all python dependencies we
> gate on the highest version that pa
17 matches
Mail list logo
