Re: [openstack-dev] Use of restricted and multiverse in the gate

2016-02-10 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2016-02-09 01:32:12 +0800 (+0800), Thomas Goirand wrote: > While it is a good idea to enhance the current Ubuntu image, at the same > time, I'd like to draw your attention that we need review for adding the > Debian image too: > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/264726 > > Igor Belikov did an am

Re: [openstack-dev] Use of restricted and multiverse in the gate

2016-02-08 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 02/07/2016 10:11 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: > Hey all, > > We're working on getting per-region APT mirrors stood up for the > nodepool nodes to use in the gate. As part of working on this, it struck > me that we currently have restricted and multiverse enabled in our > sources.list file. > > I ra

Re: [openstack-dev] Use of restricted and multiverse in the gate

2016-02-08 Thread Jesse Pretorius
On 7 February 2016 at 14:11, Monty Taylor wrote: > We're working on getting per-region APT mirrors stood up for the nodepool > nodes to use in the gate. As part of working on this, it struck me that we > currently have restricted and multiverse enabled in our sources.list file. > > I ran a quick

Re: [openstack-dev] Use of restricted and multiverse in the gate

2016-02-07 Thread Monty Taylor
On 02/07/2016 12:56 PM, Jim Meyer wrote: On Feb 7, 2016, at 6:11 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: Hey all, We're working on getting per-region APT mirrors stood up for the nodepool nodes to use in the gate. As part of working on this, it struck me that we currently have restricted and multiverse enab

Re: [openstack-dev] Use of restricted and multiverse in the gate

2016-02-07 Thread Jim Meyer
> On Feb 7, 2016, at 6:11 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: > > Hey all, > > We're working on getting per-region APT mirrors stood up for the nodepool > nodes to use in the gate. As part of working on this, it struck me that we > currently have restricted and multiverse enabled in our sources.list file.