e questions)"
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Date: Monday, February 17, 2014 at 5:21 PM
To:
"openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>"
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Storing li
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 6:13 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Sean Dague wrote:
> > Honestly, if we are going to track this, we should probably do the set
> > of things that reviewers tend to do when running through these.
> >
> > License:
> > Upstream Location:
> > Ubuntu/Debian Package: Y/N? (url)
>
Sean Dague wrote:
> Honestly, if we are going to track this, we should probably do the set
> of things that reviewers tend to do when running through these.
>
> License:
> Upstream Location:
> Ubuntu/Debian Package: Y/N? (url)
> Fedora Package: Y/N? (url)
> Suse Package: Y/N? (url)
> Last Release:
David Koo wrote:
>
>> Should we store licensing information as a comment in the
>> *-requirements files ? Can it be stored on the same line ? Something
>> like:
>>
>> oslo.messaging>=1.3.0a4 # Apache-2.0
>
> Since it's licenses we're tracking shouldn't we be tracking indirect
> dependencies too
> Should we store licensing information as a comment in the
> *-requirements files ? Can it be stored on the same line ? Something
> like:
>
> oslo.messaging>=1.3.0a4 # Apache-2.0
Since it's licenses we're tracking shouldn't we be tracking indirect
dependencies too (i.e. packages pulled in by r
+1 for yaml instead of shoving all kinds of package metadata in comments.
Sent from my really tiny device...
> On Feb 17, 2014, at 4:12 PM, "Sean Dague" wrote:
>
> Honestly, if we are going to track this, we should probably do the set
> of things that reviewers tend to do when running through
Honestly, if we are going to track this, we should probably do the set
of things that reviewers tend to do when running through these.
License:
Upstream Location:
Ubuntu/Debian Package: Y/N? (url)
Fedora Package: Y/N? (url)
Suse Package: Y/N? (url)
Last Release: Date (in case of abandonware)
Pytho
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> A year ago there was a discussion about doing a license inventory on
> OpenStack dependencies, to check that they are compatible with our own
> license and make sure any addition gets a proper license check.
>
> Back then I
