On 18 March 2014 18:30, Steven Kaufer wrote:
> I realize that if only one solution had to be chosen, then limit/marker
> would always win this war. But why can't both be supported?
One reason is that every line of extra code has a testing and
maintenance cost, so the real question isn't 'why shou
- Original Message -
From: "Jay Pipes"
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 3:30:06 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Offset support in REST API pagination
On Tue, 2014-03-18 at 13:30 -0500, Steven Kaufer wrote:
> Jay Pipes wrote on 03/18/
On Tue, 2014-03-18 at 13:30 -0500, Steven Kaufer wrote:
> Jay Pipes wrote on 03/18/2014 12:02:50 PM:
>
> > From: Jay Pipes
> > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
> > Date: 03/18/2014 12:15 PM
> > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Offset support in REST API paginati
Jay Pipes wrote on 03/18/2014 12:02:50 PM:
> From: Jay Pipes
> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
> Date: 03/18/2014 12:15 PM
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Offset support in REST API pagination
>
> On Tue, 2014-03-18 at 11:31 -0500, Steven Kaufer wrote:
> > First,
On Tue, 2014-03-18 at 11:31 -0500, Steven Kaufer wrote:
> First, here is some background on this topic:
> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/openstack/dev/2777
>
> Does anyone have any insight as to why offset is not supported in the
> REST API calls that support pagination? I realize that t
