Hi Deepak,
I think that one of the next steps for HMT is expand the concept for other
services, as Nova folks are doing with Quotas for nested projects. I think
that we can do a brainstorm about the use cases for HMT in each service,
but I think that if a resource can be shared inside the hierarch
Raildo,
Thanks for putting the blog, i really liked it as it helps to understand
how hmt works. I am interested to know more about how hmt can be exploited
for other OpenStack projects... Esp cinder, manila
On Dec 23, 2014 5:55 AM, "Morgan Fainberg"
wrote:
> Hi Raildo,
>
> Thanks for putting t
On Dec 23, 2014, at 5:10 PM, Michael Dorman wrote:
> +1 to Nova support for this getting in to Kilo.
>
> We have a similar use case. I’d really like to doll out quota on a
> department level, and let individual departments manage sub projects and
> quotas on their own. I agree that HMT has
penstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Hierarchical Multitenancy
Joe,
Thanks… there seems to be good agreement on the spec and the matching
implementation is well advanced with BARC so the risk is not too high.
Launching HMT with quota in Nova in the same re
. Currently, we have many manual helpdesk tickets with
significant latency to adjust the quotas.
Tim
From: Joe Gordon [mailto:joe.gord...@gmail.com]
Sent: 23 December 2014 17:35
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Hierarchical Multitenancy
On Dec 23, 2014 12:26
tion. We will announce the process for asking for a formal spec
exception shortly after new years.
>
>
>
> Tim
>
>
>
> From: Morgan Fainberg [mailto:morgan.fainb...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 23 December 2014 01:22
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usa
: Re: [openstack-dev] Hierarchical Multitenancy
Hi Raildo,
Thanks for putting this post together. I really appreciate all the work you
guys have done (and continue to do) to get the Hierarchical Mulittenancy code
into Keystone. It’s great to have the base implementation merged into Keystone
for
Hi Raildo,
Thanks for putting this post together. I really appreciate all the work you
guys have done (and continue to do) to get the Hierarchical Mulittenancy code
into Keystone. It’s great to have the base implementation merged into Keystone
for the K1 milestone. I look forward to seeing the
Vish,
See comments below.
JC
On Feb 18, 2014, at 12:19 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
>
> On Feb 18, 2014, at 11:31 AM, Martin, JC wrote:
>
>>
>> I see a lot of good things happening on the hierarchical multi tenancy
>> proposal that Vish made a while back.
>>
>> However, the focus so far
On Feb 18, 2014, at 11:31 AM, Martin, JC wrote:
>
> I see a lot of good things happening on the hierarchical multi tenancy
> proposal that Vish made a while back.
>
> However, the focus so far is on roles and quota but could not find any
> discussion related to resource ownership.
>
> Is th
10 matches
Mail list logo
