[mailto:beyo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 9:44 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] DVR and FWaaS integration
Vivek,
I will try to join the DVR meeting. Since it conflicts with one of my other
meeting (from my real job), I may
@lists.openstack.org
*Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] DVR and FWaaS integration
The NS FW will be on a centralized node for sure. For the DVR + FWaaS
solution is really for EW traffic. If you are interested on the topic,
please propose your preferred meeting time and join the meeting so
that we can
S with the
>
> current DVR architecture, but there might be less takers on that.
>
>
>
> --
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Vivek
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Yi Sun [mailto:beyo...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2014 11:50 AM
> To: openstack-dev@lists.ope
same in N/S with the
current DVR architecture, but there might be less takers on that.
--
Thanks,
Vivek
From: Yi Sun [mailto:beyo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2014 11:50 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] DVR and FWaaS integration
The NS
ajeev; Gary Duan; Carl (OpenStack Neutron)
*??:*Re: [openstack-dev] DVR and FWaaS integration
All,
After talk to Carl and FWaaS team , Both sides suggested to call a
meeting to discuss about this topic in deeper detail. I heard that
Swami is traveling this week. So I guess the earliest time we can ha
; Gary Duan; Carl (OpenStack Neutron)
主题: Re: [openstack-dev] DVR and FWaaS integration
All,
After talk to Carl and FWaaS team , Both sides suggested to call a meeting to
discuss about this topic in deeper detail. I heard that Swami is traveling this
week. So I guess the earliest time we can have a
All,
After talk to Carl and FWaaS team , Both sides suggested to call a meeting
to discuss about this topic in deeper detail. I heard that Swami is
traveling this week. So I guess the earliest time we can have a meeting is
sometime next week. I will be out of town on monday, so any day after
Monday
Carl,
For the overlap IP, I was thinking about whether we could have a case
where two VMs have the same subnet but belongs to different network. So
if we create policy base on subnet, how will it work.
Yi
On 6/29/14, 12:43 PM, Carl Baldwin wrote:
In line...
On Jun 25, 2014 2:02 PM, "Yi Sun
From: Carl Baldwin [c...@ecbaldwin.net]
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 3:43 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] DVR and FWaaS integration
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 3:43 AM, Carl Baldwin
mailto:c...@ecbaldwin.net>> wrote:
I
[mailto:richardwoo2...@gmail.com]
发送时间: 2014年6月29日 12:23
收件人: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
主题: Re: [openstack-dev] DVR and FWaaS integration
Regarding of user case of this feature, are you referring E-W traffic or N-S
traffic?
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Yi Sun
mailto:beyo
In line...
On Jun 25, 2014 2:02 PM, "Yi Sun" wrote:
>
> All,
> During last summit, we were talking about the integration issues between
DVR and FWaaS. After the summit, I had one IRC meeting with DVR team. But
after that meeting I was tight up with my work and did not get time to
continue to foll
The east/west case is the only case with this asymmetric routing problem
being discussed. However, the north/south case might still be interesting
from a FWaaS perspective. The fact that the router is distributed in
pieces may affect it depending on the firewall implementation.
Carl
On Jun 28, 2
Regarding of user case of this feature, are you referring E-W traffic or
N-S traffic?
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Yi Sun wrote:
> All,
> During last summit, we were talking about the integration issues between
> DVR and FWaaS. After the summit, I had one IRC meeting with DVR team. But
> af
13 matches
Mail list logo
