Re: [openstack-dev] Barbican Incubation Review

2014-02-04 Thread Jarret Raim
I spun one up here https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/GFoJ4LpK8A Most of the questions are on our incubation wiki, but I answered each of the issues from the page you linked. Thanks, -- Jarret Raim @jarretraim On 2/4/14, 7:45 AM, "Thierry Carrez" wrote: >Jarret Raim wrote: >> Barbican,

Re: [openstack-dev] Barbican Incubation Review

2014-02-04 Thread Thierry Carrez
Jarret Raim wrote: > Barbican, the key management service for OpenStack, requested incubation > before the holidays. After the initial review, there were several issues > brought up by various individuals that needed to be resolved > pre-incubation. At this point, we have completed the work on thos

Re: [openstack-dev] Barbican Incubation Review

2014-02-03 Thread Joe Gordon
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Justin Santa Barbara wrote: > Jarret Raim wrote: > >>>I'm presuming that this is our last opportunity for API review - if >>>this isn't the right occasion to bring this up, ignore me! Apparently you are right: For incubation 'Project APIs should be reasonably s

Re: [openstack-dev] Barbican Incubation Review

2014-02-01 Thread Sergey Lukjanov
Probably, while you're not incubated, it'll be better to place this code into your repo (example: https://github.com/stackforge/solum/tree/master/contrib/devstack). On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 5:43 AM, Chad Lung wrote: > > This is a follow-up to Jarret Raim's email regarding Barbican's incubation >

Re: [openstack-dev] Barbican Incubation Review

2014-01-29 Thread Justin Santa Barbara
Jarret Raim wrote: >>I'm presuming that this is our last opportunity for API review - if >>this isn't the right occasion to bring this up, ignore me! > > I wouldn't agree here. The barbican API will be evolving over time as we > add new functionality. We will, of course, have to deal with backwar

Re: [openstack-dev] Barbican Incubation Review

2014-01-29 Thread Jarret Raim
Reply-To: OpenStack List Date: Wednesday, January 29, 2014 at 4:54 PM To: OpenStack List Cc: "barbi...@lists.rackspace.com" Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Barbican Incubation Review On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Jarret Raim wrote: > > All, > > Barbican, the

Re: [openstack-dev] Barbican Incubation Review

2014-01-29 Thread Jarret Raim
On 1/29/14, 4:21 PM, "Justin Santa Barbara" wrote: >* the API for asymmetric keys (i.e. keys with a public and private >part) has not yet been fleshed out That's correct. We are working with folks from HP and others on the blueprints to implement asymmetric support. Our hope is to have it done f

Re: [openstack-dev] Barbican Incubation Review

2014-01-29 Thread Anne Gentle
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Jarret Raim wrote: > > All, > > Barbican, the key management service for OpenStack, requested incubation > before the holidays. After the initial review, there were several issues > brought up by various individuals that needed to be resolved > pre-incubation. At t

Re: [openstack-dev] Barbican Incubation Review

2014-01-29 Thread Justin Santa Barbara
Given the issues we continue to face with achieving stable APIs, I hope there will be some form of formal API review before we approve any new OpenStack APIs. When we release an API, it should mean that we're committing to support that API _forever_. Glancing at the specification, I noticed some