Thanks Adrian, we can talk later in the IRC meeting.
2015-07-28 4:07 GMT-04:00 Adrian Otto :
> Jay,
>
> Yes, it is on the agenda.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Adrian
>
> On Jul 27, 2015, at 8:32 AM, Jay Lau wrote:
>
> Adrian,
>
> Can we put hyper as a topic for this week's (Tomorrow) meeting? I want
Thanks Matt, though proposed but nova team think that this should belong to
Magnum ;-) We can check where is the best place for hyper.
2015-07-27 16:06 GMT-04:00 Matt Riedemann :
>
>
> On 7/26/2015 11:43 PM, Adrian Otto wrote:
>
>> Peng,
>>
>> For the record, the Magnum team is not yet comfortabl
Jay,
Yes, it is on the agenda.
Thanks,
Adrian
On Jul 27, 2015, at 8:32 AM, Jay Lau
mailto:jay.lau@gmail.com>> wrote:
Adrian,
Can we put hyper as a topic for this week's (Tomorrow) meeting? I want to have
some discussion with you.
Thanks
2015-07-27 0:43 GMT-04:00 Adrian Otto
mailto:ad
On 7/26/2015 11:43 PM, Adrian Otto wrote:
Peng,
For the record, the Magnum team is not yet comfortable with this
proposal. This arrangement is not the way we think containers should be
integrated with OpenStack. It completely bypasses Nova, and offers no
Bay abstraction, so there is no user se
Adrian,
Can we put hyper as a topic for this week's (Tomorrow) meeting? I want to
have some discussion with you.
Thanks
2015-07-27 0:43 GMT-04:00 Adrian Otto :
> Peng,
>
> For the record, the Magnum team is not yet comfortable with this
> proposal. This arrangement is not the way we think con
12:43 PM
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
questions)";
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Announcing HyperStack project
Peng,
For the record, the Magnum team is not yet comfortable with this proposal.
This arrangement is not the way we think containers should
Peng,
For the record, the Magnum team is not yet comfortable with this proposal. This
arrangement is not the way we think containers should be integrated with
OpenStack. It completely bypasses Nova, and offers no Bay abstraction, so there
is no user selectable choice of a COE (Container Orchest
