On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 03:24:01PM -0500, Jay Pipes wrote:
> Here's another thought: is the big-bang integrated 6-month fixed release
> cycle useful any more? Can we talk about using more of a moving train model
> that doesn't have these long freeze cycles? At least for some of the
> projects, I th
Agreed. It causes two problems:
1) 9 month delays in getting code into a release
2) Some projects consider something to be breakable, from a back
compatibility point of view, until it has made a formal release, which
means anybody cutting releases from anything other than final/stable is
facing th
On 02/23/2015 04:02 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 02/23/2015 03:45 PM, Dan Smith wrote:
Seriously, what is the point of 6-month releases again? We are a
free-form open source set of projects, with a lot of intelligent
engineers. Why are we stuck using an outdated release model?
I've been wondering
> What's the alternative proposed release model?
I deleted a couple paragraphs of the above before sending this, thinking
(like Joe) that there probably needs to be a specific discussion aimed
at this topic. But:
> What's the compatibility story with Glance / Neutron / Cinder in
> whatever that m
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 03:47:20PM +0100, Nikola Đipanov wrote:
> On 02/20/2015 11:33 PM, Sourabh Patwardhan (sopatwar) wrote:
> > Nova core reviewers,
> >
> > May I request an FFE for Cisco VIF driver:
> > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/157616/
> >
> > This is a small isolated change similar t
On 02/20/2015 11:33 PM, Sourabh Patwardhan (sopatwar) wrote:
> Nova core reviewers,
>
> May I request an FFE for Cisco VIF driver:
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/157616/
>
> This is a small isolated change similar to the vhostuser / open contrail
> vif drivers for which FFE has been granted.
rg>>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Outcome of the nova FFE meeting for Kilo
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 6:18 AM, Matt Riedemann
mailto:mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>> wrote:
On 2/16/2015 9:57 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
Hi Mikal, sorry for top-posting. What was the final decision regarding
the
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 6:18 AM, Matt Riedemann
wrote:
>
>
> On 2/16/2015 9:57 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
>
>> Hi Mikal, sorry for top-posting. What was the final decision regarding
>> the instance tagging work?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -jay
>>
>> On 02/16/2015 09:44 PM, Michael Still wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
On 2/16/2015 9:57 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
Hi Mikal, sorry for top-posting. What was the final decision regarding
the instance tagging work?
Thanks,
-jay
On 02/16/2015 09:44 PM, Michael Still wrote:
Hi,
we had a meeting this morning to try and work through all the FFE
requests for Nova. The mee
Hi Mikal, sorry for top-posting. What was the final decision regarding
the instance tagging work?
Thanks,
-jay
On 02/16/2015 09:44 PM, Michael Still wrote:
Hi,
we had a meeting this morning to try and work through all the FFE
requests for Nova. The meeting was pretty long -- two hours or so -
10 matches
Mail list logo
