ks!
2014-04-12 1:00 GMT+08:00 Tim Bell :
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Andrew Laski [mailto:andrew.la...@rackspace.com]
> > Sent: 11 April 2014 16:38
> > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev]
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Laski [mailto:andrew.la...@rackspace.com]
> Sent: 11 April 2014 16:38
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Dynamic scheduling
>
> On 04/10/14 at 11:33pm, Oleg Gel
Is there anyone currently working on Neat/Gantt projects? I'd like to
contribute to them, as well.
2014-04-11 11:37 GMT-03:00 Andrew Laski :
> On 04/10/14 at 11:33pm, Oleg Gelbukh wrote:
>
>> Andrew,
>>
>> Thank you for clarification!
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Andrew Laski > >wro
On 04/10/14 at 11:33pm, Oleg Gelbukh wrote:
Andrew,
Thank you for clarification!
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Andrew Laski wrote:
The scheduler as it currently exists is a placement engine. There is
sufficient complexity in the scheduler with just that responsibility so I
would prefer
2014-04-11 0:22 GMT+08:00 Sylvain Bauza :
>
>
>
> 2014-04-10 16:16 GMT+02:00 Jay Lau :
>
>
>>
>>
>> 2014-04-10 0:57 GMT+08:00 Susanne Balle :
>>
>> Ditto. I am interested in contributing as well.
>>>
>>> Does Gant work with Devstack? I am assuming the link will give me
>>> directions on how to tes
2014-04-11 3:54 GMT+08:00 Steve Gordon :
> - Original Message -
> > Is it a same thing like openstack-neat project?
> >
> > http://openstack-neat.org/
> >
> > I am curious about why Neat was not accepted previously.
> >
> > -Hao
>
> Did anyone ever try to submit it? Looks useful though.
>
- Original Message -
> - Original Message -
> > Is it a same thing like openstack-neat project?
> >
> > http://openstack-neat.org/
> >
> > I am curious about why Neat was not accepted previously.
> >
> > -Hao
>
> Did anyone ever try to submit it? Looks useful though.
>
> -Steve
- Original Message -
> Is it a same thing like openstack-neat project?
>
> http://openstack-neat.org/
>
> I am curious about why Neat was not accepted previously.
>
> -Hao
Did anyone ever try to submit it? Looks useful though.
-Steve
___
Ope
Andrew,
Thank you for clarification!
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Andrew Laski wrote:
>
>
> The scheduler as it currently exists is a placement engine. There is
> sufficient complexity in the scheduler with just that responsibility so I
> would prefer to see anything that's making runtime d
2014-04-10 16:16 GMT+02:00 Jay Lau :
>
>
>
> 2014-04-10 0:57 GMT+08:00 Susanne Balle :
>
> Ditto. I am interested in contributing as well.
>>
>> Does Gant work with Devstack? I am assuming the link will give me
>> directions on how to test it and contribute to the project.
>>
> You can refer to
>
S open source?
>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
>
> Shane
>
> *From:* Susanne Balle [mailto:sleipnir...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 10, 2014 12:57 AM
> *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Dynamic scheduling
2014-04-10 0:57 GMT+08:00 Susanne Balle :
> Ditto. I am interested in contributing as well.
>
> Does Gant work with Devstack? I am assuming the link will give me
> directions on how to test it and contribute to the project.
>
You can refer to
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014
On 04/10/14 at 11:48am, Oleg Gelbukh wrote:
Hello, Jay,
As a fork of nova-scheduler, Gantt most likely will handle initial
placement. However, even nova-scheduler now supports some runtime
operations (for example, scheduling of evacuated/migrated instances).
Please note that the operations you
questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Dynamic scheduling
Is the [1] mentioned below open source? Interested in it :)
Also, my own opinion is nova is a cloud solution that aim to control virtual /
real machine lifecycle management the dynamic scheduling mechanism is
something like
Stack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
,
Date: 04/09/2014 11:45 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Dynamic scheduling
@Oleg, Till now, I'm not sure the target of Gantt, is it for initial
placement policy or run time policy or both, can y
)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Dynamic scheduling
Hello, Jay,
As a fork of nova-scheduler, Gantt most likely will handle initial placement.
However, even nova-scheduler now supports some runtime operations (for example,
scheduling of evacuated/migrated instances).
Given the runtime scheduling
Hello, Jay,
As a fork of nova-scheduler, Gantt most likely will handle initial
placement. However, even nova-scheduler now supports some runtime
operations (for example, scheduling of evacuated/migrated instances).
Given the runtime scheduling arises in this list regularly, I guess such
features
ource?
Thanks.
--
Shane
From: Susanne Balle [mailto:sleipnir...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 12:57 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Dynamic scheduling
Ditto. I am interested in contributing as well.
Does Gant work
2014-04-09 18:57 GMT+02:00 Susanne Balle :
>
> Does Gant work with Devstack? I am assuming the link will give me
> directions on how to test it and contribute to the project.
>
>
https://github.com/openstack/gantt/blob/master/README.rst#disclaimer
Please consider Gantt repository as a no-op repo,
Ditto. I am interested in contributing as well.
Does Gant work with Devstack? I am assuming the link will give me
directions on how to test it and contribute to the project.
Susanne
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Henrique Truta <
henriquecostatr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> @Oleg, @Sylvain, @Leand
@Oleg, @Sylvain, @Leandro, Thanls. I'll check the Gantt project and the
blueprint
2014-04-09 12:59 GMT-03:00 Sylvain Bauza :
>
>
>
> 2014-04-09 17:47 GMT+02:00 Jay Lau :
>
> @Oleg, Till now, I'm not sure the target of Gantt, is it for initial
>> placement policy or run time policy or both, can y
2014-04-09 17:47 GMT+02:00 Jay Lau :
> @Oleg, Till now, I'm not sure the target of Gantt, is it for initial
> placement policy or run time policy or both, can you help clarify?
>
>
I don't want to talk on behalf of Oleg, but Gantt is targeted to be the
forklift of the current Nova scheduler. So, a
@Oleg, Till now, I'm not sure the target of Gantt, is it for initial
placement policy or run time policy or both, can you help clarify?
@Henrique, not sure if you know IBM PRS (Platform Resource Scheduler) [1],
we have finished the "dynamic scheduler" in our Icehouse version (PRS 2.2),
it has exac
Hi Enrique,
This bp [1] may cover the uses cases you are proposing. ( maybe not
using ceilometer )
Also, you can take a look at openstack-neat [2] ( outside project ),
that try to achieve something similar, but seems to be outdated.
There's another initiate to have an external scheduler (GANTT
Henrique,
You should check out Gantt project [1], it could be exactly the place to
implement such features. It is a generic cross-project Scheduler as a
Service forked from Nova recently.
[1] https://github.com/openstack/gantt
--
Best regards,
Oleg Gelbukh
Mirantis Labs
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at
25 matches
Mail list logo
