nt from my Android phone using TouchDown ( www.nitrodesk.com )
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Carl Baldwin [ c...@ecbaldwin.net ]
> > Received: Wednesday, 27 Aug 2014, 5:07
> > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List [ openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> > ]
>
iginal Message-
> > From: Carl Baldwin [c...@ecbaldwin.net]
> > Received: Wednesday, 27 Aug 2014, 5:07
> > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List [
> openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org]
> > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Juno-3 BP meeting
> >
> >
>
; To: OpenStack Development Mailing List [openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org]
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Juno-3 BP meeting
>
>
>
>
> Kyle,
>
> These are three good ones. I've been reviewing the HA ones and have had an
> eye on the other two.
>
>
: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Juno-3 BP meeting
Kyle,
These are three good ones. I've been reviewing the HA ones and have had an
eye on the other two.
1300 is a bit early but I'll plan to be there.
Carl
On Aug 26, 2014 4:04 PM, "Kyle Mestery" wrote:
> I'd like to pro
Kyle,
These are three good ones. I've been reviewing the HA ones and have had an
eye on the other two.
1300 is a bit early but I'll plan to be there.
Carl
On Aug 26, 2014 4:04 PM, "Kyle Mestery" wrote:
> I'd like to propose a meeting at 1300UTC on Thursday in
> #openstack-meeting-3 to discuss
Hi Kyle,
I have conflicts for 13 UTC - Thursday is already full for me, but I'll try
anyway, to join the convo on IRC.
I agree the 3 blueprints you've mentioned are the ones we should really
merge for Juno.
To this aim, I wonder why [1] has not been set to high. Nevertheless it
does not matter a
