Yes, the backends were deployed in cluster configuration (the
configurations are available in the appendix).
I'll make a change to the doc to make sure this is reflected properly.
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 11:29 AM, Kevin Benton wrote:
> Were the backends (zookeeper, etcd) deployed in a cluster con
Were the backends (zookeeper, etcd) deployed in a cluster configuration? I
can't quite tell from the doc.
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 12:58 AM, John Schwarz wrote:
> You're right Joshua.
>
> Tooz HEAD points to 0f4e1198fdcbd6a29d77c67d105d201ed0fbd9e0.
>
> With regards to etcd and zookeeper's versio
You're right Joshua.
Tooz HEAD points to 0f4e1198fdcbd6a29d77c67d105d201ed0fbd9e0.
With regards to etcd and zookeeper's versions, they are:
zookeeper-3.4.5+28-1.cdh4.7.1.p0.13.el6.x86_64,
etcd-2.2.5-2.el7.0.1.x86_64.
John.
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 8:14 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> Th
Hi John,
Thanks for gathering this info,
Do you have the versions of the backend that were used here
(particularly relevant for etcd which has a new release pretty frequently).
It'd be useful to capture that info also :)
John Schwarz wrote:
Hi everyone,
Following [1], a few of us sat down
