On Wed, 2015-01-07 at 10:51 +, Derek Higgins wrote:
> Hi All,
> I intended to bring this up at this mornings meeting but the train I
> was on had no power sockets (and I had no battery) so sending to the
> list instead.
>
> We currently run our CI with on images built for i386, we took thi
On 01/08/2015 10:22 AM, Derek Higgins wrote:
On 07/01/15 23:41, Ben Nemec wrote:
I don't feel like we've been all that capacity constrained lately
anyway, so as I said in my other (largely unnecessary, as it turns out)
email, I'm +1 on doing this.
Correct we're not currently constrained on capa
On 07/01/15 23:41, Ben Nemec wrote:
> On 01/07/2015 11:29 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
>> Excerpts from Derek Higgins's message of 2015-01-07 02:51:41 -0800:
>>> Hi All,
>>> I intended to bring this up at this mornings meeting but the train I
>>> was on had no power sockets (and I had no battery) so
On 01/07/2015 11:29 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Excerpts from Derek Higgins's message of 2015-01-07 02:51:41 -0800:
>> Hi All,
>> I intended to bring this up at this mornings meeting but the train I
>> was on had no power sockets (and I had no battery) so sending to the
>> list instead.
>>
>> We c
+1 to all of this.
On 01/07/2015 04:51 AM, Derek Higgins wrote:
> Hi All,
> I intended to bring this up at this mornings meeting but the train I
> was on had no power sockets (and I had no battery) so sending to the
> list instead.
>
> We currently run our CI with on images built for i386, we
Excerpts from Derek Higgins's message of 2015-01-07 02:51:41 -0800:
> Hi All,
> I intended to bring this up at this mornings meeting but the train I
> was on had no power sockets (and I had no battery) so sending to the
> list instead.
>
> We currently run our CI with on images built for i386,
