,
-Sam.
From: Samuel Bercovici
Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2014 2:51 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey
Hi everyone,
I think that it is a good feedback to prioritize features.
I can
pdf.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> -Sam.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Samuel Bercovici
> *Sent:* Thursday, May 08, 2014 2:51 PM
>
> *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruv
, 2014 2:17 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey
Hi Samuel--
I've been heads down working on API proposal review documentation, and haven't
had time to fill it out yet. Do you have a deadlin
ote:
> 6 people have completed the survey so far.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Samuel Bercovici
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 06, 2014 10:56 AM
>
> *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sru
6 people have completed the survey so far.
From: Samuel Bercovici
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2014 10:56 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey
Hi Everyone,
The survey is now live via: http://eSurv.org
42 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey
Sam,
I'm assuming you want one person from each company to answer correct? I'm
pretty sure people in each organization will vote the same...at
-
From: Jorge Miramontes [mailto:jorge.miramon...@rackspace.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2014 10:16 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey
I agree that everyone's thoughts should be in it. I
Okay, makes sense to gather all data now and interpret this later. I'm too
jaded for these types of debates right now since the summit is around the
corner.
Cheers,
--Jorge
On 5/6/14 3:32 PM, "Jay Pipes" wrote:
>On 05/06/2014 04:22 PM, Stephen Balukoff wrote:
>> I think the plan is to releas
Comments inline (and not in red this time!).
On 5/6/14 3:30 PM, "Jay Pipes" wrote:
>On 05/06/2014 03:16 PM, Jorge Miramontes wrote:
>> I agree that everyone's thoughts should be in it. I don't see why a
>> representative vote does not allow for that. Sam put a text box on each
>> use case to cap
On 05/06/2014 04:22 PM, Stephen Balukoff wrote:
I think the plan is to release all the raw results of this to the public
as well-- meaning that it should be possible to come up with a
"representative average" per organization, as well as several other ways
to interpret the data. Right now, the e
On 05/06/2014 03:16 PM, Jorge Miramontes wrote:
I agree that everyone's thoughts should be in it. I don't see why a
representative vote does not allow for that. Sam put a text box on each
use case to capture extra thoughts.
Because all of us have different experiences. Not all of us have worked
I think the plan is to release all the raw results of this to the public as
well-- meaning that it should be possible to come up with a
"representative average" per organization, as well as several other ways to
interpret the data. Right now, the emphasis is just to gather the data. We
can decide
I'd like to add that size of the organization (or really, size of the
development team) that is voting in this quiz does not directly correlate
to size of customer base. If there were any weighting happening, I'd hope
these answers would be weighted by size of user base, since really it is
the user
I agree that everyone's thoughts should be in it. I don't see why a
representative vote does not allow for that. Sam put a text box on each
use case to capture extra thoughts.
I would hope that no organization would be so confused as to have widely
varying viewpoints on *what their customers want*
On 05/06/2014 02:42 PM, Jorge Miramontes wrote:
Sam,
I'm assuming you want one person from each company to answer correct?
I'm pretty sure people in each organization will vote the same…at least
I'd hope!
I'd hope not! :)
Even within the same organization or company, we all have different
id
ailing List (not for usage questions)"
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Date: Tuesday, May 6, 2014 2:56 AM
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Sto
week so we can have enough information to
base decisions next week.
Regards,
-Sam.
From: Samuel Bercovici
Sent: Monday, May 05, 2014 4:52 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey
Hi,
I
Hi,
I will not freeze the document to allow people to work on requirements which
are not tenant facing (ex: operator, etc.)
I think that we have enough use cases for tenant facing capabilities to reflect
most common use cases.
I am in the process of creation a survey in surveymonkey for tenant f
anks,
German
From: Stephen Balukoff
[mailto:sbaluk...@bluebox.net<mailto:sbaluk...@bluebox.net>]
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2014 12:52 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey
Yep, I'm all for this as
>
> *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey
>
>
>
> Yep, I'm all for this as well!
>
>
>
> Note: We're just talking about "user" use cases in this
Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey
Yep, I'm all for this as well!
Note: We're just talking about "user" use cases in this survey, correct?
(We'll leave the operator use cases for later whe
Yep, I'm all for this as well!
Note: We're just talking about "user" use cases in this survey, correct?
(We'll leave the operator use cases for later when we have more of a story
and/or model to work with on how we're going to approach those, yes?)
Thanks,
Stephen
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 11:54
That sounds good to me. The only thing I would caution is that we have
prioritized certain requirements (like HA and SSL Termination) and I want to
ensure we use the survey to compliment what we have already mutually agreed
upon. Thanks for spearheading this!
Cheers,
--Jorge
From: Samuel Berco
23 matches
Mail list logo
