Yes, let's discuss this in Tokyo.
Shinobu
- Original Message -
From: "Clinton Knight"
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
Sent: Thursday, October 8, 2015 2:15:52 AM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] CephFS native driver
Hi, John. If you want to discuss this in Tokyo, I suggest you add it to
the etherpad:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/manila-mitaka-summit-topics
I look forward to meeting you at the Summit. It¹d be great to see a demo
of your Ceph driver.
Clinton
On 10/7/15, 6:56 AM, "John Spray" wrote:
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Deepak Shetty wrote:
>>
>> Currently, as you say, a share is accessible to anyone who knows the
>> auth key (created a the time the share is created).
>>
>> For adding the allow/deny path, I'd simply create and remove new ceph
>> keys for each entity being allowed/
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 3:32 PM, John Spray wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Deepak Shetty wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 7:19 PM, John Spray wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I've recently started work on a CephFS driver for Manila. The (early)
> >> code is here:
> >> http
> For ultra isolation, the RADOS pools would also be configured to map to
> different OSDs.
This is really good idea, and will be motivation to me.
> Separate RADOS namespaces do not provide physical separation (multiple
> namespaces exist within one pool, hence on the same OSDs), but they
> wou
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 8:26 AM, Deepak Shetty wrote:
>> > I think it will be important to document all of these limitations. I
>> > wouldn't let them stop you from getting the driver done, but if I was a
>> > deployer I'd want to know about these details.
>>
>> Yes, definitely. I'm also adding an
patch didn't come as a complete surprise.
John
>
> Shinobu
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Ben Swartzlander"
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>
> Sent: Saturday, September 26, 2015 9:27:58 AM
> Subject
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Deepak Shetty wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 7:19 PM, John Spray wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've recently started work on a CephFS driver for Manila. The (early)
>> code is here:
>> https://github.com/openstack/manila/compare/master...jcsp:ceph
>>
>
> 1) REA
On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 4:32 PM, John Spray wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 1:27 AM, Ben Swartzlander
> wrote:
> > On 09/24/2015 09:49 AM, John Spray wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I've recently started work on a CephFS driver for Manila. The (early)
> >> code is here:
> >> https://github.
27:58 AM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] CephFS native driver
On 09/24/2015 09:49 AM, John Spray wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've recently started work on a CephFS driver for Manila. The (early)
> code is here:
> https://github.com/openstack/manila/compare/master...jcsp:ceph
Awesome! Thi
On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 12:02 PM, John Spray wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 1:27 AM, Ben Swartzlander
> wrote:
>> All snapshots are read-only... The question is whether you can take a
>> snapshot and clone it into something that's writable. We're looking at
>> allowing for different kinds of s
On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 1:27 AM, Ben Swartzlander wrote:
> On 09/24/2015 09:49 AM, John Spray wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've recently started work on a CephFS driver for Manila. The (early)
>> code is here:
>> https://github.com/openstack/manila/compare/master...jcsp:ceph
>
>
> Awesome! This is
On 09/24/2015 09:49 AM, John Spray wrote:
Hi all,
I've recently started work on a CephFS driver for Manila. The (early)
code is here:
https://github.com/openstack/manila/compare/master...jcsp:ceph
Awesome! This is something that's been talking about for quite some time
and I'm pleased to see
Thanks!
Keep me in the loop.
Shinobu
- Original Message -
From: "John Spray"
To: "Shinobu Kinjo"
Cc: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 6:54:09 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] CephFS
ds).
John
>
>
>> This piece of work is specifically about Manila; general improvements
>> in Ceph integration would be a different topic.
>
> That's interesting to me.
>
> Shinobu
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "John Spray"
> To: &
n would be a different topic.
That's interesting to me.
Shinobu
- Original Message -
From: "John Spray"
To: "Shinobu Kinjo"
Cc: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 5:51:36 PM
Subject: Re: [op
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 8:04 AM, Shinobu Kinjo wrote:
> So here are questions from my side.
> Just question.
>
>
> 1.What is the biggest advantage comparing others such as RDB?
> We should be able to implement what you are going to do in
> existing module, shouldn't we?
I guess you mean comp
So here are questions from my side.
Just question.
1.What is the biggest advantage comparing others such as RDB?
We should be able to implement what you are going to do in
existing module, shouldn't we?
2.What are you going to focus on with a new implementation?
It seems to be to use NFS
18 matches
Mail list logo
