On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Devananda van der Veen <
devananda@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for putting this back on my radar
>
> I think a separate directory to indicate "these are contributed but less
> tested drivers" is a fair middle ground here, though time will tell how
> much ad
Thanks for putting this back on my radar
I think a separate directory to indicate "these are contributed but less
tested drivers" is a fair middle ground here, though time will tell how
much addtitional code-maintenance burden that places on developers. Since
this is just a power interface, I
pment Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
> openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> >> Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 3:18:22 PM
> >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] handling drivers that will not be
> third-party tested
> >>
> >> On Thu, May
On Wed, 2014-05-21 at 17:03 -0700, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
> I'd like to bring up the topic of drivers which, for one reason or
> another, are probably never going to have third party CI testing.
>
>
> Take for example the iBoot driver proposed here:
> https://review.openstack.org/50977
>
Apologies for a late response. I agree, it’s an unfortunate aspect of Ironic’s
hardware-focused role in the project that means CI test coverage is hard to
achieve. And it is misleading to present our drivers as continuously tested
when they are not.
Nevertheless, I add a +1 in favour of keepin
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Dan Prince wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Doug Hellmann"
>> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>>
>> Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 3:18:22 PM
>> Subje
- Original Message -
> From: "Doug Hellmann"
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>
> Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 3:18:22 PM
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] handling drivers that will not be
> third-party
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 4:48 AM, Lucas Alvares Gomes
wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 1:03 AM, Devananda van der Veen
> wrote:
>> I'd like to bring up the topic of drivers which, for one reason or another,
>> are probably never going to have third party CI testing.
>>
>> Take for example the iBoo
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Dan Prince wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Devananda van der Veen" >
> [...]
>
> interface. However, I also don't expect the author to provide a full
> > third-party CI environment, and as such, we should not claim the same
> level
> > of test cov
- Original Message -
> From: "Devananda van der Veen"
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List"
> Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 8:03:15 PM
> Subject: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] handling drivers that will not be
> third-party tested
>
> I'd like to bring up the topic of drivers which,
> Linux has a very different model then OpenStack does, the article you
> mention is talking about a whole separate git repo, along with a separate
> (re: just OR, not exclusive or) set of maintainers. If you leave these
> drivers in a staging directory would you still require two cores for the
> c
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 1:48 AM, Lucas Alvares Gomes
wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 1:03 AM, Devananda van der Veen
> wrote:
> > I'd like to bring up the topic of drivers which, for one reason or
> another,
> > are probably never going to have third party CI testing.
> >
> > Take for example th
IMO the separated did in the project repo is a good approach (like
contrib dir in Heat).
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-05-22 at 09:48 +0100, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote:
>> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 1:03 AM, Devananda van der Veen
>> wrote:
>> > I'd like to br
On Thu, 2014-05-22 at 09:48 +0100, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 1:03 AM, Devananda van der Veen
> wrote:
> > I'd like to bring up the topic of drivers which, for one reason or another,
> > are probably never going to have third party CI testing.
> >
> > Take for example the
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 1:03 AM, Devananda van der Veen
wrote:
> I'd like to bring up the topic of drivers which, for one reason or another,
> are probably never going to have third party CI testing.
>
> Take for example the iBoot driver proposed here:
> https://review.openstack.org/50977
>
> I
+1 for community contribs and a common place for them to be sourced.
From: Devananda van der Veen [mailto:devananda@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 5:03 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] handling drivers that will not be third-party
tested
I
16 matches
Mail list logo
