Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Third-party drivers and testing

2014-01-21 Thread Devananda van der Veen
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: > On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Devananda van der Veen < > devananda@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I've been thinking about how we should treat third-party drivers in >> Ironic for a while, and had several discussions at the Hong Kon

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Third-party drivers and testing

2014-01-21 Thread Devananda van der Veen
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 7:47 PM, Christopher Yeoh wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 6:17 AM, Devananda van der Veen < > devananda@gmail.com> wrote: > >> 1. each driver must adhere to the existing driver interfaces. >> 2. each driver must have comprehensive unit test coverage and sufficient >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Third-party drivers and testing

2014-01-20 Thread Jay Pipes
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Devananda van der Veen < devananda@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I've been thinking about how we should treat third-party drivers in Ironic > for a while, and had several discussions at the Hong Kong summit and last > week at LCA. Cinder, Nova, Neutron, and T

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Third-party drivers and testing

2014-01-19 Thread Christopher Yeoh
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 6:17 AM, Devananda van der Veen < devananda@gmail.com> wrote: > 1. each driver must adhere to the existing driver interfaces. > 2. each driver must have comprehensive unit test coverage and sufficient > inline documentation. > 3. vendors are responsible for fixing bugs