Actually, we have some improvements with snapshots size and we are going to
rethink our snapshots in upcoming releases. Miroslav, could you clarify the
importance of this change in 6.1?
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Tomasz Napierala
wrote:
> Guys,
>
> We have requests for this improvement. It
Guys,
We have requests for this improvement. It will help with huge environments, we
are talking about >5GiB of logs.
Is it on the agenda?
Regards,
> On 22 Dec 2014, at 07:28, Bartlomiej Piotrowski
> wrote:
>
> FYI, xz with multithreading support (5.2 release) has been marked as stable
> y
FYI, xz with multithreading support (5.2 release) has been marked as stable
yesterday.
Regards,
Bartłomiej Piotrowski
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Bartłomiej Piotrowski <
bpiotrow...@mirantis.com> wrote:
> On 24 Nov 2014, at 12:25, Matthew Mosesohn wrote:
> > I did this exercise over many
I've moved the bug to 6.1. And I'm going to add it to our roadmap as a
separate item.
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Mike Scherbakov
wrote:
> Can we put it as a work item for diagnostic snapshot improvements, so we
> won't forget about this in 6.1?
>
>
> On Tuesday, November 25, 2014, Dmitry P
Can we put it as a work item for diagnostic snapshot improvements, so we
won't forget about this in 6.1?
On Tuesday, November 25, 2014, Dmitry Pyzhov wrote:
> Thank you all for your feedback. Request postponed to the next release. We
> will compare available solutions.
>
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 a
Thank you all for your feedback. Request postponed to the next release. We
will compare available solutions.
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Vladimir Kuklin
wrote:
> guys, there is already pxz utility in ubuntu repos. let's test it
>
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Bartłomiej Piotrowski <
>
guys, there is already pxz utility in ubuntu repos. let's test it
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Bartłomiej Piotrowski <
bpiotrow...@mirantis.com> wrote:
> On 24 Nov 2014, at 12:25, Matthew Mosesohn wrote:
> > I did this exercise over many iterations during Docker container
> > packing and fou
Mattherw, Dmitry
I would suggest to use:
1) multi-threaded utilities
2) use xz for small snapshots (<1gb) and lrzip for bigger snapshots
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Matthew Mosesohn
wrote:
> I did this exercise over many iterations during Docker container
> packing and found that as long a
On 24 Nov 2014, at 12:25, Matthew Mosesohn wrote:
> I did this exercise over many iterations during Docker container
> packing and found that as long as the data is under 1gb, it's going to
> compress really well with xz. Over 1gb and lrzip looks more attractive
> (but only on high memory systems)
I did this exercise over many iterations during Docker container
packing and found that as long as the data is under 1gb, it's going to
compress really well with xz. Over 1gb and lrzip looks more attractive
(but only on high memory systems). In reality, we're looking at log
footprints from OpenStac
IMO, we should get a bunch of snapshots and decide which compression to use
according to the results of an experiment. XZ compression takes much
longer, so you will need to use parallel xz compression utility.
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Tomasz Napierala
wrote:
>
> > On 21 Nov 2014, at 16:5
> On 21 Nov 2014, at 16:55, Dmitry Pyzhov wrote:
>
> We have a request for change compression from gz to xz. This simple change
> halfs our snapshots. Does anyone has any objections? Otherwise we will
> include this change in 6.0 release.
I agree with the change, but it shouldn’t be high
Reg
12 matches
Mail list logo
