k Development Mailing List (not for usage questions);
>a...@redhat.com
>Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Barbican] Barebones CA
>
>On 06/25/2014 02:42 PM, Clark, Robert Graham wrote:
>>
>> Ok, I’ll hack together a dev plugin over the next week or so, other work
>> notwithstan
: [openstack-dev] [Barbican] Barebones CA
On 06/25/2014 02:42 PM, Clark, Robert Graham wrote:
>
> Ok, I’ll hack together a dev plugin over the next week or so, other work
> notwithstanding. Where possible I’ll probably borrow from the dog tag
> plugin as I’ve not looked closely a
On 26/06/2014 03:43, "Nathan Kinder" wrote:
>
>
>On 06/25/2014 02:42 PM, Clark, Robert Graham wrote:
>>
>> Ok, I’ll hack together a dev plugin over the next week or so, other work
>> notwithstanding. Where possible I’ll probably borrow from the dog tag
>> plugin as I’ve not looked closely at th
On 06/25/2014 02:42 PM, Clark, Robert Graham wrote:
>
> Ok, I’ll hack together a dev plugin over the next week or so, other work
> notwithstanding. Where possible I’ll probably borrow from the dog tag
> plugin as I’ve not looked closely at the plugin infrastructure in Barbican
> recently.
My un
Ok, I’ll hack together a dev plugin over the next week or so, other work
notwithstanding. Where possible I’ll probably borrow from the dog tag
plugin as I’ve not looked closely at the plugin infrastructure in Barbican
recently.
Is this something you’d like a blueprint for first?
-Rob
On 25/0
I think the plan is to create a Dogtag instance so that integration
tests can be run whenever code is checked in (both with and without a
Dogtag backend).
Dogtag isn't that difficult to deploy, but being a Java app, it does
bring in a set of dependencies that developers may not want to deal with
f
Rob,
RedHat is working on a backend for Dogtag, which should be capable of
doing something like that. That's still a bit hard to deploy, so it would
make sense to extend the 'dev' plugin to include those features.
Jarret
On 6/24/14, 4:04 PM, "Clark, Robert Graham" wrote:
>Yeah pretty much.
>
Yeah pretty much.
That¹s something I¹d be interested to work on, if work isn¹t ongoing
already.
-Rob
On 24/06/2014 18:57, "John Wood" wrote:
>Hello Robert,
>
>I would actually hope we have a self-contained certificate plugin
>implementation that runs 'out of the box' to enable certificate
Hello Robert,
I would actually hope we have a self-contained certificate plugin
implementation that runs 'out of the box' to enable certificate generation
orders to be evaluated and demo-ed on local boxes.
Is this what you were thinking though?
Thanks,
John
