Re: [openstack-dev] excessively difficult to support both iso8601 0.1.4 and 0.1.8 as deps

2013-11-28 Thread Matthias Runge
On 11/27/2013 06:46 PM, Alan Pevec wrote: > 2013/11/27 Sean Dague : >> The problem is you can't really support both iso8601 was dormant >> for years, and the revived version isn't compatible with the old >> version. So supporting both means basically forking iso8601 and >> maintaining you own versi

Re: [openstack-dev] excessively difficult to support both iso8601 0.1.4 and 0.1.8 as deps

2013-11-27 Thread David Kranz
On 11/27/2013 12:46 PM, Alan Pevec wrote: 2013/11/27 Sean Dague : The problem is you can't really support both iso8601 was dormant for years, and the revived version isn't compatible with the old version. So supporting both means basically forking iso8601 and maintaining you own version of it mo

Re: [openstack-dev] excessively difficult to support both iso8601 0.1.4 and 0.1.8 as deps

2013-11-27 Thread Alan Pevec
2013/11/27 Sean Dague : > The problem is you can't really support both iso8601 was dormant for > years, and the revived version isn't compatible with the old version. > So supporting both means basically forking iso8601 and maintaining you > own version of it monkey patched in your own tree. Right

Re: [openstack-dev] excessively difficult to support both iso8601 0.1.4 and 0.1.8 as deps

2013-11-27 Thread Zhi Yan Liu
Yes agreed with Sean, make compatible with both iso8601 is overcomplicated. This is my abandoned try: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/53186/ zhiyan On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 8:49 PM, Sean Dague wrote: > The problem is you can't really support both iso8601 was dormant for > years, and the revived

Re: [openstack-dev] excessively difficult to support both iso8601 0.1.4 and 0.1.8 as deps

2013-11-27 Thread Sean Dague
The problem is you can't really support both iso8601 was dormant for years, and the revived version isn't compatible with the old version. So supporting both means basically forking iso8601 and maintaining you own version of it monkey patched in your own tree. On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 1:58 AM, Yagu

Re: [openstack-dev] excessively difficult to support both iso8601 0.1.4 and 0.1.8 as deps

2013-11-26 Thread Yaguang Tang
after update to iso8601>=0.1.8, it breaks stable/neutron jenkins tests, because stable/glance requires iso8601<=0.1.4, log info https://jenkins02.openstack.org/job/periodic-tempest-devstack-vm-neutron-stable-grizzly/43/console , I have filed a bug to track this https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+b

Re: [openstack-dev] excessively difficult to support both iso8601 0.1.4 and 0.1.8 as deps

2013-11-26 Thread Thomas Goirand
I'm sorry to restart this topic. I don't mind if we upgrade to 0.1.8, but then I will need to have patches for Havana to support version 0.1.8. Otherwise, it's going to be very difficult on the packaging side: I will need to upload 0.1.8 for Icehouse, but then it will break everything else (eg: Ha

Re: [openstack-dev] excessively difficult to support both iso8601 0.1.4 and 0.1.8 as deps

2013-10-24 Thread Morgan Fainberg
It seems like adopting 0.1.8 is the right approach. If it doesn't work with other projects, we should work to help those projects get updated to work with it. --Morgan On Thursday, October 24, 2013, Zhi Yan Liu wrote: > Hi all, > > Adopt 0.1.8 as iso8601 minimum version: > https://review.opensta

Re: [openstack-dev] excessively difficult to support both iso8601 0.1.4 and 0.1.8 as deps

2013-10-24 Thread Zhi Yan Liu
Hi all, Adopt 0.1.8 as iso8601 minimum version: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/53567/ zhiyan On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 4:09 AM, Dolph Mathews wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Robert Collins > wrote: >> >> On 24 October 2013 07:34, Mark Washenberger >> wrote: >> > Hi folks! >> > >>

Re: [openstack-dev] excessively difficult to support both iso8601 0.1.4 and 0.1.8 as deps

2013-10-23 Thread Dolph Mathews
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Robert Collins wrote: > On 24 October 2013 07:34, Mark Washenberger > wrote: > > Hi folks! > > > > 1) Adopt 0.1.8 as the minimum version in openstack-requirements. > > 2) Do nothing (i.e. let Glance behavior depend on iso8601 in this way, > and > > just fix the te

Re: [openstack-dev] excessively difficult to support both iso8601 0.1.4 and 0.1.8 as deps

2013-10-23 Thread Robert Collins
On 24 October 2013 07:34, Mark Washenberger wrote: > Hi folks! > > 1) Adopt 0.1.8 as the minimum version in openstack-requirements. > 2) Do nothing (i.e. let Glance behavior depend on iso8601 in this way, and > just fix the tests so they don't care about these extra formats) > 3) Make Glance work

Re: [openstack-dev] excessively difficult to support both iso8601 0.1.4 and 0.1.8 as deps

2013-10-23 Thread Davanum Srinivas
+1 to option #1 -- dims On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Mark Washenberger < mark.washenber...@markwash.net> wrote: > Hi folks! > > In the images api, we depend on iso8601 to parse some dates and times. > Recently, since version 0.1.4, python-iso8601 added support for a few more > formats, and

Re: [openstack-dev] excessively difficult to support both iso8601 0.1.4 and 0.1.8 as deps

2013-10-23 Thread Chuck Short
Hi, Why not use python-dateutil? Regards chuck On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Mark Washenberger < mark.washenber...@markwash.net> wrote: > Hi folks! > > In the images api, we depend on iso8601 to parse some dates and times. > Recently, since version 0.1.4, python-iso8601 added support for a

[openstack-dev] excessively difficult to support both iso8601 0.1.4 and 0.1.8 as deps

2013-10-23 Thread Mark Washenberger
Hi folks! In the images api, we depend on iso8601 to parse some dates and times. Recently, since version 0.1.4, python-iso8601 added support for a few more formats, and we finally got some other issues nailed down by 0.1.8. Maybe the fact that these formats weren't supported before was a bug. I do