Thanks a lot Dan for your reply.
This is definitely a good first step to move out nova-compute from the services
to be upgraded atomically.
Looking forward to your blog post.
Best,
Meghal
On Mar 24, 2014, at 12:14 PM, Dan Smith wrote:
> Signed PGP part
> > Where can I obtain more information
QA cell
- upgrade production cells
Tim
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Behrens [mailto:cbehr...@codestud.com]
> Sent: 24 March 2014 21:09
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Rolling upgrades in icehouse
>
&g
On Mar 24, 2014, at 12:31 PM, Tim Bell wrote:
>
> How does this interact with cells ? Can the cell API instances be upgraded
> independently of the cells themselves ?
>
> My ideal use case would be
>
> - It would be possible to upgrade one of the cells (such as a QA environment)
> before th
o: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Rolling upgrades in icehouse
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> > Where can I obtain more information about this feature?
>
> - From the blog post that I've
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Where can I obtain more information about this feature?
- From the blog post that I've yet to write :D
> Does above imply that database is upgraded along with control
> service update as well?
Yes, but only for the services that interact directly
Hello folks,
I was reading a blogpost mentioned in the newsletter here -
http://redhatstackblog.redhat.com/2014/03/11/an-icehouse-sneak-peek-openstack-compute-nova/
A note about rolling upgrades is mentioned -
The Compute services now allow for a level of rolling upgrade, whereby control
servic